Does this classify as a big game?

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
35,014
Reaction score
20,099
according to Dak detractors, its not a big game. because didn't make a difference to Vikings and that they didn't take the game seriously and they had a bad day, and the refs made all the calls against them and it was the defense carrying the day and not the offense and it was the running game and it was maher, and rush could have scored 55 on them easily and the passes weren't accurate, all off by 6-12 inches and recievers had to controt their bodies like a magician and it was luck, moore did it by the way he called the game... so no it wasn't Dak if that's what you are asking.
 

FanofJerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,792
Reaction score
1,415
It was Dak's fault Indianapolis let Hurts walk in the winning score though.

The Devil is desperate with its logic.
 

CowboyoWales

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,968
Reaction score
5,103
You didn't view the Vikings as a "weaker opponent" when you made a thread about how Dak should be benched for Cooper Rush, in the case of the Cowboys losing to the Vikings and Giants with Dak as the QB. You clearly have an agenda now since you attached yourself to the Cooper Rush bandwagon. I bet you wouldn't have called them a "weak opponent" had the Cowboys beaten the Vikings with Cooper Rush, while scoring much less points on offense than they did with Dak. :facepalm::rolleyes:
Yep, I think 'Weaker opposition' wasn't quite the correct term, however, we do match up fairly favorably especially as we were able to overcome their run defense, got the early lead which made them abandon the run.
I wonder how we would of coped with their run offense if they,'d stuck with it....then again who cares, that's an issue for another day
 

Romo_To_Dez

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,849
Reaction score
15,492
Yep, I think 'Weaker opposition' wasn't quite the correct term, however, we do match up fairly favorably especially as we were able to overcome their run defense, got the early lead which made them abandon the run.
I wonder how we would of coped with their run offense if they,'d stuck with it....then again who cares, that's an issue for another day

But still if the Cowboys would have somehow lost to the Vikings, then leeblair and other Dak critics would have most likely been making threads about how Dak can't beat winning or good teams and that Cooper Rush should start. And I still doubt that leeblair would be calling the Vikings a "weaker opponent" if the Cowboys had beaten them with Cooper Rush. And would be giving Rush much of the credit, where as he is trying to downplay Dak's part in the dominant win over the Vikings.
 

CowboyoWales

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,968
Reaction score
5,103
But still if the Cowboys would have somehow lost to the Vikings, then leeblair and other Dak critics would have most likely been making threads about how Dak can't beat winning or good teams and that Cooper Rush should start. And I still doubt that leeblair would be calling the Vikings a "weaker opponent" if the Cowboys had beaten them with Cooper Rush. And would be giving Rush much of the credit, where as he is trying to downplay Dak's part in the dominant win over the Vikings.
Shock horror, there are trolls who don't like Dak, dye to a myriad of reasons.
There are also fans who don't see him do anything wrong (or accept he's better playing a simple game).
I would suggest ignoring both margins and glory (hope) the team can help give Dak yesterday's scenario.
 

starfan1

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,523
Reaction score
12,619
But still if the Cowboys would have somehow lost to the Vikings, then leeblair and other Dak critics would have most likely been making threads about how Dak can't beat winning or good teams and that Cooper Rush should start. And I still doubt that leeblair would be calling the Vikings a "weaker opponent" if the Cowboys had beaten them with Cooper Rush. And would be giving Rush much of the credit, where as he is trying to downplay Dak's part in the dominant win over the Vikings.
Lee dating all the way back to the ranch days always has a crazy take about as relevant as this mornings flush

must have been hard for him as he’s an admitted Viking fan . I bet he wanted Rush to start. He’s still smarting from last years loss
 

DenCWBY

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,176
Reaction score
5,935
This is a "statement game" only if we win on TG, and the following Sundays afterwards until the season is over. Does this team have a killer mentality to keep the foot on the neck of its opponent? Hope so!!
 

DenCWBY

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,176
Reaction score
5,935
Oh I need to see those positive posts about Dak with my own eyes before I believe that.
You're not going to see that until Dak stacks at least 3 consecutive games of strong production, low to no mistake football together.
 

RonnieT24

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,532
Reaction score
22,951
Good to see so many have figured out the pattern of assigning "bigness" to games.. Cowboys won.. so the game was meaningless and the opponent was garbage. The fact that Dak lit them up tells you the Vikings were really a high school team masquerading as an 8-1 NFL squad battling for the top seed in the conference and who had just beaten the consensus "Super Bowl favorites" on the road last week. All a mirage.. they suck so the Cowboys should have beaten them by 50 not 40. I was disappointed in the game frankly. I expected a 50 burger.. Didn't you?
 

RonnieT24

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,532
Reaction score
22,951
You're not going to see that until Dak stacks at least 3 consecutive games of strong production, low to no mistake football together.

Nah.. the ABD crowd already has their excuses ready ... When he destroys the Giants it will prove they were a fraud all along.. after all Cooper Rush beat them in Jersey.. When he spanks the Colts it will be because they have a broadcaster pretending to be their head coach.. Yall know how this works..
 
Top