What does this even mean?
27 years of tangible data says otherwise.
So in other words they don't have the culture until they win something.
KC went 50 years without a Super Bowl win. They even brought in Joe Montana at one point.
And how does that make things acceptable here? People here are amazing. Right now our comp for NFCCG is Washington and Detroit. Sorry but just because another club suffered doesn't mean it makes our suffering ok.
No. They don't currently have a culture that facilitates winning championships.
How's Kansas City doing now?
The Cowboys are doing good now too. The 25 wins over the last 2 years is up there with the best in the league including the Chiefs.
25 wins over 2 years isn't suffering to me. The team is a contender and has a shot this year and Detroit has a shot this year too.
I agree we have a chance but the 25 did nothing for me ending in the same place. I just don't like the time frame we have been through. Too much wasted talent and years on bad coaches and ideas.
So then who does?
I enjoy the wins and the excitement. I love it. I enjoy the whole thing. The off season with the draft and the building of the team. The long ride with nothing and then the excitement as they build a winner. We went a couple of decades before and hit rock bottom at 1 and 15. It was so sweet when they turned that around.
I don't understand how fans can look at a team that went 12-5 two years in a row and say "they have no chance because 1996."
It's funny to me. I also remember when fans said that Landry couldn't win the big one after the 2 loses to Lombardi, 2 loses to the Browns, and the loss to the Colts. That is kind of similar to the current fans claiming that they can't win with Jerry.
I do not understand how this base has allowed the Jones to convince them that this is okay. They lowered the bar and you guys want to celebrate 25 wins in two years. The Chiefs have won 31 over the past two years.
And we've been paying for those 3 SBs for 30 years. Nobody cares about them any more. And the person that's responsible for them isn't even in our ROH.
Ah yes, Jerry gets no credit for the ones they won but all the blame for not winning again. Classic lol
You got that right. I look at what he's done since he fired jimmy because that's when he took over as the real GM of the Cowboys. Nobody's ever going to convince me that Jerry had anything to do with those championships other than getting the players Jimmy wanted. He's had too many years running things by himself to convince me otherwise. If Jerry had been running the team from the very beginning like he is now we'd be talking about those great Cowboy teams of the 1970's. The 90's dynasty never would have happened. He should kiss his lucky starts that he had a buddy named Jimmy Johnson because he's been living on the reputation of those teams for 30 years.
Does he not get credit for hiring Jimmy?
That's the only credit I give him. But Jimmy was coming to the NFL with or without him. We were just lucky that they were friends. Too bad it couldn't have lasted.
