So point out to me in the statement by the NFL where they explained why his punch was so much more worse the Toney's punch that it required a 2 game suspension vs a 12K fine?
That's the issue, no one is saying what he did wasn't stupid or a violation of the rule. The question is, why did he get two games when Toney only got a small fine.. both were premediated, both were sucker punches, both were clear violation of the rule... they were exactly the same offense, so where did the NFL state why Hills was so egregious vs what Toney did ? I have read their statement 10 times, all it does is recite the rule. We know the rule was violated. And if everyone that threw a punch was given 2 games , so be it.. not a word would be said. But to pick and choose, which ones are worthy of suspension - there are only few vs those the league will only do a fine is the issue. It opens up the NFL to the bias talk, which should never be the case.
I get you hate the kid, which is fine but don't make stuff up, the NFL did not provide that type of explanation because there is no explanation that makes sense, so they can't provide one.
