Dump Every High Salary!

[Teague31]

Since big and little are too cheap to field a contender, let’s see what the roster would look like if they got rid of every player making any sort of decent money (trade or cut). Not realistic of course but what the hell

QB Rush
RB they are all cheap
WR Tolbert, Brooks, Flournoy
TE they are all cheap
LT Guyton
LG Smith
C Cooper
RG Bass
RT Richards

DE Sam
DE Kneeland
DT osa
DT mazi
LB Clark
LB Oshown
LB Marist
CB Scott
CB Carson
S Thomas
S Bell

Boom. Done. The Jones’ get what they want. More money for the yacht.

 

[Bullflop]

I'm sure Stephen will be greatly relieved to know that cutting all those expensive salaries is something as simple as that.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Only problem is who jersey people gonna buy lol.

 

[Bobhaze]

Would that lineup meet the league minimum in cap spending? There is a mandatory minimum.

 

[movaughn88]

Stay off the drugs, son.

 

[nalam]

Would that lineup meet the league minimum in cap spending? There is a mandatory minimum.

Interesting , what is cowboy's minimum?

Not that it will be ever that bad , Jerry knows it will be bad for business, he would like to be the team ending up in winning season and playoff mix, not that championships are important.

 

[KingCorcoran]

I'm sure Stephen will be greatly relieved to know that cutting all those expensive salaries is something as simple as that.

Dump Stephen.

 

[LACowboysFan1]

Boom. Done. The Jones’ get what they want. More money for the yacht.

Not really, teams must spend at least 89% of the cap over a 4 year period. Getting rid of top players would result (probably) in a very poor record, leading to lowered ticket sales, parking fees, concessions, jersey sales, etc. Seriously doubt the owners would have more money than having a good team....

 

[Bobhaze]

Interesting , what is cowboy's minimum?

Not that it will be ever that bad , Jerry knows it will be bad for business, he would like to be the team ending up in winning season and playoff mix, not that championships are important.

I‘m pretty sure for all NFL teams it is 89% of the cap at minimum for 4 straight years.

 

[Loso86]

Since big and little are too cheap to field a contender, let’s see what the roster would look like if they got rid of every player making any sort of decent money (trade or cut). Not realistic of course but what the hell

QB Rush
RB they are all cheap
WR Tolbert, Brooks, Flournoy
TE they are all cheap
LT Guyton
LG Smith
C Cooper
RG Bass
RT Richards

DE Sam
DE Kneeland
DT osa
DT mazi
LB Clark
LB Oshown
LB Marist
CB Scott
CB Carson
S Thomas
S Bell

Boom. Done. The Jones’ get what they want. More money for the yacht.

And boom Cowboys are worse off and the fans actually have more to complain about

 

[big dog cowboy]

Since big and little are too cheap to field a contender

I get what your saying...but...minimum salary cap spend is 95% each right isn't it? Exactly how is that cheap?

 

[KingCorcoran]

I get what your saying...but...minimum salary cap spend is 95% each right isn't it? Exactly how is that cheap?

No team can fall below 89% of the cap over a running four year period while the league collectively cannot be under 95% of the cap in any single year.

 

[VaqueroTD]

Only problem is who jersey people gonna buy lol.

Here you go. Dirt cheap. Only problem is doesn’t come bigger than size small.

 

[plymkr]

Would that lineup meet the league minimum in cap spending? There is a mandatory minimum.

What is the penalty if you don’t hit mandatory minimum. I’m just curious, I’m not endorsing we actually do this.

 

[Coogiguy03]

Since big and little are too cheap to field a contender, let’s see what the roster would look like if they got rid of every player making any sort of decent money (trade or cut). Not realistic of course but what the hell

QB Rush
RB they are all cheap
WR Tolbert, Brooks, Flournoy
TE they are all cheap
LT Guyton
LG Smith
C Cooper
RG Bass
RT Richards

DE Sam
DE Kneeland
DT osa
DT mazi
LB Clark
LB Oshown
LB Marist
CB Scott
CB Carson
S Thomas
S Bell

Boom. Done. The Jones’ get what they want. More money for the yacht.

Well there's one person on this team where it's WHO ARE YOU GOING TO replace him with!!!??

 

[Coogiguy03]

Not really, teams must spend at least 89% of the cap over a 4 year period. Getting rid of top players would result (probably) in a very poor record, leading to lowered ticket sales, parking fees, concessions, jersey sales, etc. Seriously doubt the owners would have more money than having a good team....

No just Dallas we're taking about, we'd do this and Jerry would market this team as the best he's ever seen to make money for himself

 

[Bullflop]

Dump Stephen.

He likely would have been dumped if Jerry weren't the owner, GM, and his daddy, as well. That setup is far from ideal for the team, imho.

 

[Whyjerry]

Need players with more position flex. More players from Mexico too.

Go Cowboys!

 

[KingCorcoran]

What is the penalty if you don’t hit mandatory minimum. I’m just curious, I’m not endorsing we actually do this.

I would guess the difference would be paid to the NFLPA. If you’re that franchise responsible for the league dropping below 95% in any league year I imagine the other 31 ownership groups would be in poor humor.

 

[calicowboy54]

Since big and little are too cheap to field a contender, let’s see what the roster would look like if they got rid of every player making any sort of decent money (trade or cut). Not realistic of course but what the hell

QB Rush
RB they are all cheap
WR Tolbert, Brooks, Flournoy
TE they are all cheap
LT Guyton
LG Smith
C Cooper
RG Bass
RT Richards

DE Sam
DE Kneeland
DT osa
DT mazi
LB Clark
LB Oshown
LB Marist
CB Scott
CB Carson
S Thomas
S Bell

Boom. Done. The Jones’ get what they want. More money for the yacht.

our record would be 2 - 15