xwalker;5033060 said:
Seattle is a Kiffin type defense. Their starting SLB is K.J.Wright. Wilbur compares favorably with Wright.
K.J. Wright
Height: 6033
Weight: 246
40 Yrd Dash: 4.75
20 Yrd Dash: 2.65
10 Yrd Dash: 1.65
225 Lb. Bench Reps: 20
Vertical Jump: 32
Broad Jump: 10'00"
20 Yrd Shuttle: 4.46
3-Cone Drill: 7.26
Kyle Wilbur
Height: 6036
Weight: 249
40 Yrd Dash: 4.73/4.64
20 Yrd Dash: 2.69
10 Yrd Dash: 1.60
225 Lb. Bench Reps: 25
Vertical Jump: 33 1/2
Broad Jump: 09'09"
20 Yrd Shuttle: 4.31
3-Cone Drill: 7.11
xwalker;5033064 said:
Chicago, another Kiffin style defense, had Lance Briggs as their starting WLB. Wilbur compares favorably with him also.
Lance Briggs
40 Yrd Dash: 4.75
10 Yrd Dash: 1.66
Kyle Wilbur
40 Yrd Dash: 4.73/4.64
10 Yrd Dash: 1.60
Clearly Wilber
can play OLB in this system... but I don't think he is what the team (Kiffin) desires at that position.
Since making the decision to switch to a 4-3 from their 3-4, Dallas has signed 2 LB's:
6-0, 230 lb. Ernie Sims
6-1, 235 lb. Justin Durant
That is a far cry from:
6-4, 246 lb. Kyle Wilber
6-5, 260 lb. Alex Albright (another 34 LB who people are saying can play LB for Kiffin).
People can say that Wilber and Albright will be LB's for Kiffin in Dallas all they want, but the type of LB's the Cowboys are signing isn't the type of player that Wilber and Albright are.
Despite the fact that Seattle has a bigger, slower LB playing SLB and that Chicago has a slower guy playing WLB, history shows that Kiffin prefers players that more resemble a large safety than a 3-4 OLB. In fact, most teams running Kiffin's scheme lean towards smaller, quicker players like Durant and Sims... and away from longer, edge rusher types like Wilber and Albright.
Wright would certainly represent an anomaly much more so than the norm when talking about OLB's for Kiffin style 4-3 defenses.
I mean anything is possible, but I find it highly unlikely that Kiffin would be satisfied with Wilber as a starting SOLB... and the fact that Dallas has used its extremely limited free agency dollars primarily on OLB's that fit my definition of a Kiffin OLB only serves to bolster that viewpoint.
I had similar conversations with people (maybe even you) about Spencer earlier this year. People were saying that Spencer would play SOLB for Kiffin and that he just wasn't big enough for DE. They gave me stats and explained how solid in coverage Spencer was. I heard about how Seattle used a SDE who weighed over 300 lbs. All that is fine and dandy... but history and common sense said Spencer would be an edge rusher for Kiffin. That he would play DE in a scheme that typically used converted LB's at DE... Converted Safeties at LB... and as a general rule valued speed and change of direction over size at every front 7 position.
I argued that it would be silly to have a guy like Spencer dropping back in coverage when his two main strength's are stopping the run and rushing the QB. Why, I wondered, would you want someone like Spencer in coverage when you could have a player like Bruce Carter or Justin Durant covering TE's?
The answer of course is you wouldn't. And I think that's the same answer you get when you ask the same question about Wilber. Would you want Wilber or Durant trying to tackle RGIII in the open field?
When he looks at Durant's agility drills and film of Durant playing football, Kiffin, I think, would rather have Durant trying to do that.
So, while I do understand that it is possible to have Wilber playing at OLB, I don't think he's what Kiffin wants at the position in an ideal world.