Eagles haven't beaten a Good Team on the Road all Year

[Blackspider214]

What are you even arguing here? I know the difference between the two QBs. But last time I checked, the games Vick played counts.

Tebow and Manning never played in the same season or on the same team together so that comparison is not even valid. And comparing 2 different seasons is not like comparing one single season.

Fact is, Eagles are 9-6 and Dallas is 8-7. To say the Eagles are having a much better season than a team that if they lose to on Sunday, is out of the playoffs, is nonsense.

If you want to say the Eagles have been playing better of late, then that's fine. But not that their body of work is so much better. Because it isn't.

 

[Wayne02]

Whoever started the Giants game (the week after Dallas beat Philly 17-3). I just guessed it was Barkley. I don't really care who it was. I would say what a completely different QB with a completely different style (a.k.a. Vick) did with this team is pretty irrelevant. That's like saying Tebow's Broncos were relevant to Peyton's Broncos even though they had 90% of the same players. So, if Romo played 8 games this season and they went, say, 6-2, and Orton played 8 games and they went, say, 2-6, would Orton's Cowboys really be relevant to Romo's Cowboys? This team is 1-4 without Foles and 8-2 with him. There's a pretty clear difference that this is a completely different team with Foles. You're acting like this team with Foles is not better than your average 9-6 team. That's stupid. The Packers with Rodgers are better than a 7-7-1 team. I don't see what's so hard to understand.

He understands, he's just being willfully ignorant just for the sake of arguing, but maybe I'm giving him too much credit.

 

[Next Years Champ]

And?

They're not facing a good team this week either. Worse yet it's an average, at best, team who is going to likely be without it's franchise QB.

This.

We are not a GOOD TEAM either..