YesIs noon EST?
Thanks. Swift was the vet back I had my eye on…..
Philly going hard after BarkleyDoes this mean Philly takes Pollard off our hands.
why is it good? They have no QB, so why waste free agent money on a RB. Since they are taking a qb 1st in the draft, wouldnt it make more sense to load up on the Oline and WR to give the new qb the best shot at success? What good is spending that kind of money on a RB for a bottom feeder team?This is a good signing for the Bears. Tough runner.
Does this mean Philly takes Pollard off our hands.
off our hands? Pollard is a free agent so he isnt on our hands.Does this mean Philly takes Pollard off our hands.
Comes down to what one thinks of Fields. I’m not a fan either.why is it good? They have no QB, so why waste free agent money on a RB. Since they are taking a qb 1st in the draft, wouldnt it make more sense to load up on the Oline and WR to give the new qb the best shot at success? What good is spending that kind of money on a RB for a bottom feeder team?
Fully agree.Not a great deal for Chicago. Swift has game, but has always struggled with staying healthy, so he's a guy who's best used in a committee. $8M/yr for a committee back feels pretty rich.
They have the #1 over all pick and they're gonna get compensation for trading Fields. They also pick in the top of the 2nd round so any run on QBs or WRs will push O line to them. This is a good signing.why is it good? They have no QB, so why waste free agent money on a RB. Since they are taking a qb 1st in the draft, wouldnt it make more sense to load up on the Oline and WR to give the new qb the best shot at success? What good is spending that kind of money on a RB for a bottom feeder team?
And the 9th overall pick tooThey have the #1 over all pick and they're gonna get compensation for trading Fields. They also pick in the top of the 2nd round so any run on QBs or WRs will push O line to them. This is a good signing.