D-line should dominate, which means we should probably expect the opposite
D-line should dominate, which means we should probably expect the opposite
Teams are very content to throw short against us. Though in the last couple of weeks, while those teams have avoided sacks, they also haven't put up many points. It's, what? 13 points a game the last couple?
D-line should dominate, which means we should probably expect the opposite
D-line should dominate, which means we should probably expect the opposite
I've been shocked as teams have gone to the quicker trigger, that we haven't played more zone. I know it's not our DB's strengths for the most part, but it allows them to get eyes on and would open up much more opportunity for picks--particularly against an erratic Bradford.
Just like the Seattle game.
Peters isn't coming back? That's good news for us, if true. I love the idea of Johnson at LT.
The only TD we actually gave up against Seattle was Church blowing his assignment in zone and not carrying his guy far enough. I think we don't play it because we're just really bad at it.
How this defense got out of that game without getting a SINGLE sack on Wilson is equally mind blowing and pathetic.
Yeah, it's pathetic, but until Gregory gets back to full speed and actually gets more than a handful of snaps per game, it's the Hardy show. No one else can get consistent pressure and I'm not sure Gregory can either. However, when he was healthy for the short while that he was, he was a disruptive force against the Giants in that first game.
No, it should be good news for us. Just like facing the turnstile that is the Seattle Seahawks offensive line. That worked out well.
The only TD we actually gave up against Seattle was Church blowing his assignment in zone and not carrying his guy far enough. I think we don't play it because we're just really bad at it.