Early game thread!

[gmb1]

Who y'all got in the late game? Packers go down for good

God willing they lose.

 

[cowboy_ron]

Shurmer = Garrett

1. Went for 2 on the opening drive TD.....failed

2. Barkley has nearly a 100 yards in the 1st half.......only like 4 carries in the 2nd half.........stop what works in the first half ....to what doesn't work.....pure Garrett moves.

 

[MCMetal69]

Shurmer = Garrett

1. Went for 2 on the opening drive TD.....failed

2. Barkley has nearly a 100 yards in the 1st half.......only like 4 carries in the 2nd half.........stop what works in the first half ....to what doesn't work.....pure Garrett moves.

That godawful pick thrown by Eli at the end of the 1st half was crippling , too.........................

 

[Runwildboys]

How in the world does Denver with Case Keenum and one of the ugliest uniforms in creation beat the Chargers & Steelers in back-to-back weeks ?

Thin air tonight?

 

[MCMetal69]

Thin air tonight?

On the last offensive play for the Steelers , it certainly appeared Big Ben was having trouble breathing........................

 

[Bleedblue1111]

That godawful pick thrown by Eli at the end of the 1st half was crippling , too.........................

No doubt. Forced it into triple coverage with Barkley wide open underneath.

 

[gmb1]

The Giants probably lost to piss us off! LMAO

 

[Mannix]

AGAIN, where did the Cliff Kingsbury thread go? Was it removed, and why???

 

[Bleedblue1111]

AGAIN, where did the Cliff Kingsbury thread go? Was it removed, and why???

Is this the thread you`re looking for? Looks like it was put in the roster zone. Probably because of their thread policies.

https://cowboyszone.com/threads/mer...-in-kliff-kingsbury-asap.421357/#post-8725787

 

[gmoney112]

Shurmer = Garrett

1. Went for 2 on the opening drive TD.....failed

2. Barkley has nearly a 100 yards in the 1st half.......only like 4 carries in the 2nd half.........stop what works in the first half ....to what doesn't work.....pure Garrett moves.

I think they shut down Barkley because they actually wanted to lose, so they can draft their QB next year.

 

[Mannix]

------Is this the thread you`re looking for? Looks like it was put in the roster zone. Probably because of their thread policies.

Thanks bleedblue....what policy are you speaking of exactly? Weird place to stick it....is someone being told to avoid/hide all unfounded rumors?

 

[Bleedblue1111]

------Is this the thread you`re looking for? Looks like it was put in the roster zone. Probably because of their thread policies.

Thanks bleedblue....what policy are you speaking of exactly? Weird place to stick it....is someone being told to avoid/hide all unfounded rumors?

You`re welcome. I`m not 100 % sure, to be honest. I think you can private message a moderator to get that answer. I think it has something to do with what subject matter belongs in what forum.

 

[Carson]

I think they shut down Barkley because they actually wanted to lose, so they can draft their QB next year.

I don’t really buy in that.

With a win today, they were 4-6 and two games back.

They have a Trubisky less Bears, Beat up Commanders, Up and down Titans, Up and down Colts than Dallas at home.

Running the table would be unlikely. But sitting two games back, with us playing the Saints this week and the Skins playing the Eagles, they easily could’ve been one game back of first next week.

 

[cowboyec]

Thin air tonight?

great song.

 

[cowboy_ron]

I think they shut down Barkley because they actually wanted to lose, so they can draft their QB next year.

That's sure what it looked like.

 

[darthseinfeld]

I think about it this way, 1 teams is down. 2 more to go

 

[Pessimist_cowboy]

Rodgers is now 0-38 when trailing teams by more than 1 point in the 4th quarter.