Easy off season plan

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,865
Reaction score
26,552
You think you can't find a QB that leads the NFL in INTs despite missing 5 games, disappears in big games, and the team goes 4-1 WITHOUT him?

You think that's hard to replace and without Dak it would be a rebuild?

Dak is a "rebuild" level QB. He's just more expensive.
Daks td to int ratio for his career is much better than Aikman. One year is not a career
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,438
Reaction score
73,016
You know why and you're still ignoring the other part bc it doesn't fit your bs narrative. You just want to tell half truths.
You're trying to somehow give Dak a pass for something Mahomes has done.

Let Dak accomplish what Mahomes has and nobody will care about his turnovers.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,170
Reaction score
64,688
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
So, that's a no then?

I couldn't imagine constantly talking to someone that asks me to stand by what I say just to back down.
You are backing down from the discussion because you are scared.

You would just create another account if they did lock you out. You probably already have a 2nd account.

Keep avoiding the discussion because your scared.
 

MaineBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,005
Reaction score
1,904
Naw, he's talking about the QB that threw for 4500 yards with 37 td and 10 ints the year before despite missing a game. You know the one who never had an interception problem his entire career until the GM destroyed the WR room so we ended up with 6 picks that bounced off WRs hands.
Apparently, you didn’t see the San Fran playoff game. You should watch it. Amazes me how you homers will cherry pick meaningless Dak stats just to defend him and make him look like a good QB. Open your eyes and join the rest of the world in the land of reality.
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,438
Reaction score
73,016
You are backing down from the discussion because you are scared.

You would just create another account if they did lock you out. You probably already have a 2nd account.

Keep avoiding the discussion because you’re scared.
lol at you
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,170
Reaction score
64,688
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I'd get the mods involved and request the loser of our bet to have their account locked.

All you have to do is agree to the bet.
I've seen you attempt to "account bet" multiple other people.

You need to get approval from @Reality or stop making the claim that mods will support your bet by locking someone's account permanantly.
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,438
Reaction score
73,016
I've seen you attempt to "account bet" multiple other people.

You need to get approval from @Reality or stop making the claim that mods will support your bet by locking someone's account permanantly.
I've seen you attempt to "account bet" multiple other people.

You need to get approval from @Reality or stop making the claim that mods will support your bet by locking someone's account permanantly.
Accept it or pipe down.

I have nothing left to say to you.
 

Retro88

Well-Known Member
Messages
454
Reaction score
453
Apparently, you didn’t see the San Fran playoff game. You should watch it. Amazes me how you homers will cherry pick meaningless Dak stats just to defend him and make him look like a good QB. Open your eyes and join the rest of the world in the land of reality.
What is even your post? What I said wasn't cherry picked in the slightest. He had weapons and he produced. He didnt this year while missing games as well and he wasnt as good. This isnt complicated. He is a good QB. He's just not elite and that's why you're mad. Just bc there's a lot of you, it doesn't make your "Dak is terrible" BS correct. It's not a coincidence that the only people that think he is a bad QB is the ridiculous fans. It's not.

The playoff game comment was irrelevant. It's not like I ever said that he didn't have a large share of the blame.
 

Bobhaze

Staff member
Messages
18,411
Reaction score
72,498
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,865
Reaction score
26,552
Yup.

A real Cowboys fan would slight Aikman to prop up Dak......
It’s not a slight it’s just a fact
Dak threw too many ints this year but his career hasn’t had that issue at all. In fact he’s thrown a pretty low ratio of TD to int
Why was this year different? That’s the issue
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,338
Reaction score
11,290
I guess that excuses the fact that he was leading the NFL in combined INTs and fumbles before his injure then?
Dak was widley known as one of the best at protecting the ball at QB for his career, sure if he comes back this year and keeps tossing INT's then you have an argument that makes sense. You can make the case Dak has played below his standard the past 2 SF playoff games and no one would argue...i have to say this alot here, nothing wrong with the facts....Dak is not Mahomes, Dak is also not Carson Wentz, trying to make these way out of bounds statements just makes your point watered down. If you want to argue wether Dak can play at a high level every playoff game, then yeah you would have a valid point for sure.
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,438
Reaction score
73,016
It’s not a slight it’s just a fact
Dak threw too many ints this year but his career hasn’t had that issue at all. In fact he’s thrown a pretty low ratio of TD to int
Why was this year different? That’s the issue
It's not just INTs.

In 2020 before the injury Dak was leading the NFL in combined fumbles and INTS, in 2021 he led the NFL in fumbles (Missed 1 game), and in 2022 he led the NFL in INTs (Missed 5 games).

He's had an issue for 3 seasons now protecting the football.
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,338
Reaction score
11,290
It's not just INTs.

In 2020 before the injury Dak was leading the NFL in combined fumbles and INTS, in 2021 he led the NFL in fumbles (Missed 1 game), and in 2022 he led the NFL in INTs (Missed 5 games).

He's had an issue for 3 seasons now protecting the football.
Fumbles or Fumbles lost, i remeber this argument and it hinged on fumbles but not fumbles lost. If your going to use context are you counting the INT's that clanged of recievers hands?
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,438
Reaction score
73,016
Dak was widley known as one of the best at protecting the ball at QB for his career, sure if he comes back this year and keeps tossing INT's then you have an argument that makes sense. You can make the case Dak has played below his standard the past 2 SF playoff games and no one would argue...i have to say this alot here, nothing wrong with the facts....Dak is not Mahomes, Dak is also not Carson Wentz, trying to make these way out of bounds statements just makes your point watered down. If you want to argue wether Dak can play at a high level every playoff game, then yeah you would have a valid point for sure.
It's been 3 straight years that Dak has been bad with protecting the ball.

You brought up Wentz, so let's use him.

Since 2020 Wentz has a combined 55 INTS and fumbles. Dak has a combined 50 INTs and fumbles.

Dak has also played in 3 less games.

So, for however bad you think Wentz is at protecting the ball, just know that Dak is only 5 INTs/Fumbles away from matching him and that's with 3 less games played.
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,438
Reaction score
73,016
Fumbles or Fumbles lost, i remeber this argument and it hinged on fumbles but not fumbles lost. If your going to use context are you counting the INT's that clanged of recievers hands?
We can disregard the INTs that bounced off receivers hands if we add in ones that were dropped by the defense also.

Because there's a lot of those too, ya know?
 
Top