- Messages
- 58,971
- Reaction score
- 60,826
You act like it was a touches issue, just in pure numbers.
I don't know about anyone else, I had more of a problem with the situational touches, not the overall volume.
If it was 3rd down and 7 at a crucial point in the game, I wanted Elliott on the field not Dunbar.
It was not just about raw touches. Him getting spelled by Alfred Morris on a garbage down to get a few yards late in the game or even to close out a half is totally different.
You can't run him into the ground, but putting an inferior player into the game at a crucial time as a result of touch management is not smart either.
Dunbar had 9 rushes, and 24 targets as a receiver the entire season last year. All of the targets from the shotgun.
6 of those rushes on first downs, and 5 of them on first and 10 because there were 1st down packages where they put him in in the shotgun.
He had 11 3rd-down passing targets all year (3 receptions for first downs), almost entirely on 2nd and 10+ or 3rd and intermediate/long (he had 1 target all year on 3rd and short).
This is a normal distribution for a backup player who primarily plays in shotgun situations for you because he's got the ability to line up outside and can run the entire route tree. The player you want in his place not only lead the entire league in rushing attempts from the RB position, but also had more targets than he did (both overall and from the shotgun).
You're complaining about a non-issue.