Apollo Creed;3831153 said:
I understand the context of how the comparison was made, but I've heard names like Walsh and Lombardi thrown around on here on more than one occassion.
And debating with Babe about Jason Garrett would be like debating with Charlie Sheen about partying. He's been a Garrett supporter since the word go.
The point I'm making is, if he is such a wonderful, structured, disciplinarian - why did he just sit back and watch Wade run this team into the ground?
The company line is, 'he didn't want to step on any toes.' But I don't buy that, Wade doesn't seem like the kinda guy that would be difficult to communicate with, or someone not open to new ideas. Great coaches make an impact, whether they're an assistant or not - Garrett as a coordinator didn't make much of an impact. Garrett as the coach of a 1-7 team with no expectations, made an impact.
I'm curious to see how the players embrace his philosophies, they've played well initially for 3 different coaches now - Tuna, Wade, and RJ. The problem has been getting them to buy into their approach and start picking up what they're putting down. That's the question.
And in terms of the pm, it's not just those guys. He isn't a guy that everyone loves, he's a guy that Jerry loves and that's all that matters. And besides, I'd rather our players not like a coach because that means he's making them do things they don't want to do.
I think Garrett earned the job, and I don't hate him - I just think this organization has severely overrated it's talent, and Garrett's success is going to make Jerry enter the offseason more complacent because of his belief in Garrett's influence. And I also don't appreciate how he and Jerry went about the Sherman 'firing'. It also doesn't help when I come to my favorite message board and seeing people post like we're coming off back to back super bowls and this team is 'saved' because of RJ. No pun intended.
so your saying those guys do dislike him and they told you more do also? If so that means we are on the right track.
and I understand what you are saying, but he was an assitant coach, not the head coach.
and just for reference. Howcome The Bengals didnt win anything when Walsh was an assistant under Paul brown for 8 Seasons? Then they even let him go and hired line coach bill johnson over walsh who ended up flaming out.
Your theory would assume that walsh told paul brown what to do and how to run the team. If walsh was any good why did he sit back and not make changes while the team lost playoff games?
it just doesnt work like that, the assitants cant be telling the head coach how to run things. In fact it works the opposite way, go watch those great nfl films pieces on parcells-bellichick with the jets. Bellichick trying to offer advice and tell parcells what to do during games and parcells having a coronary and yelling back at him this is why you wont get another job!!
I mean, look at the 85 bears. Buddy was trying to do this to ditka and they hated each other.
and just for the record I have never declared anything about garrett. I just happen to like the guy and believe he does things the right way and it goes all the way back to the days when he was here and some things he would say. I really believe he is going to be a good head coach.
and I am an adult and feel like I can make that statement without it being twisted into someone saying I am declaring him lomabardi or landry or whatever. I have no idea if we will win or not, but I like the approach he has and I think the offense has been pretty good since he showed up.
the offense here gets scrutinized for everything, that is where the fans of this organizations heads are at. Every city is different and this one happens to be an offensive minded city and fanbase. So the intense scrutiny is there.
oh and also for the record I have never heard anyone but babe and hudson houck compare him to past coaches. Babe to walsh and hudson to john robinson.