ESPN: Five Moves Cowboys Should Make

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,511
Reaction score
67,320
Five moves each NFC East team should make

8:35 AM ET
  • Bill Barnwell ESPN Staff Writer

The NFL season ended less than two weeks ago, but teams are already beginning to make moves in advance of the new league year. And with the NFL combine sprouting up in Indianapolis next week, vacations are already over for many. In addition to the scouting bonanza to come, front offices are figuring out their free-agent plans and identifying which players they'll want to retain from their own rosters heading into the new league year on March 9.

A good offseason, naturally, starts with a good beginning. That's where we come in. Teams like the Broncos and Panthers probably don't need our help, but that's never stopped us before. Over the next few days, we'll run division-by-division and detail the five moves each NFL franchise should make to kick off their respective offseasons in a positive fashion. That can include anything from cutting a longtime contributor to making a big splash in free agency -- or, in some cases, staying out of the pool altogether.

Some teams should be more active than others, so there are a few teams whose five moves extend all the way to draft day at the end of April. Other teams need to be more aggressive by the time the first day of free agency wraps up. Note that these moves aren't always in chronological order, even if they are the first five pressing decisions I've picked out. Finally, the advice is contained within its own world; multiple teams might be ideally interested in going after the same player, or a situation that might make sense for one organization wouldn't for the other.


It's 32 teams, 32 universes. Here we go.


NFC East

Dallas Cowboys


1. Cut Brandon Carr as a post-June 1 release. The Cowboys are perennially strapped for cap space, but they should have about $11 million or so available heading into the 2016 year before signing any of their unrestricted free agents, pending the official confirmation of the 2016 cap figure. (The estimate being used here for numbers throughout this series is a $154 million cap.) With less than $1 million in dead cap space for the first time seemingly since the beginning of the salary cap era, the Cowboys don't need to squeeze their veteran contracts to create more wriggle room under the cap.

In the case of Carr, though, the Cowboys are stuck with a deal that's underwater. They've restructured his deal in years past to create cap room, but now Carr is a middling cornerback with a premium cap figure. Dallas would owe the 29-year-old Carr $13.8 million to stay on the team in 2016, and while they would have been able to eliminate all but $2 million of that money if they hadn't restructured in years past, they would now owe Carr $7.4 million in dead money if they released him under the traditional fashion. As a post-June 1 release, though, Carr would only cost $4.7 million in cap space in 2016, with the remaining $2.7 million hitting the cap in 2017. Under any circumstance, it's money Dallas would be better off investing elsewhere.


2. Don't answer when the Eagles call about DeMarco Murray. A reunion between the Cowboys and their former star running back would make on-field sense for both sides. Murray was an ideal fit in Dallas' system, and while Chip Kelly is gone, the 2014 rushing leader might already be due for a change of scenery out of Philadelphia. (More on that in a minute.)
The problem is cost. The Cowboys would be on the hook for $7 million in guaranteed money this year and a minimum of $2 million (basically functioning as a buyout) with a maximum of $7.5 million in 2017. That's just not a smart investment for a running back like Murray; as talented as he is, 2014 sticks out like a sore thumb in terms of his ability to handle a heavy workload while staying healthy. Dallas can't afford to invest that much money in a running back.

3. Sign Alfred Morris instead. If the Cowboys do want to add a veteran running back from their division rivals, the 27-year-old Morris makes sense. Morris had far more success running in a zone-blocking scheme during offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan's time in Washington, is a year younger than Murray, has less of an injury history and was far more consistent than his Dallas counterpart.
Johnny Manziel. It will be tempting for owner Jerry Jones to go after the quarterback he coveted in the first round of the 2014 draft, but Manziel has shown little on the field to go with his abhorrent off-field behavior. Taking Zack Martin over Manziel was one of the best things the Cowboys have done over the past decade.
Dallas does need a backup quarterback, though, and after struggling through the Matt Cassel fiasco last year, it's clear that they need a passer who can at least vaguely emulate Tony Romo's athleticism, if not necessarily his effectiveness. Given Romo's propensity for injuries and advancing age, it's a place where the Cowboys genuinely need to invest a premium after years of getting by on the cheap. A deal for somebody like Drew Stanton or Tarvaris Jackson would be wise.

5. Add pass rush help. Defensive coordinator Rod Marinelli has made a career of turning anonymous edge rushers into superstars, but he needs bodies. Greg Hardy and rotation end Jeremy Mincey are both free agents, and after Hardy created noticeable locker room drama, it's unlikely he'll return. DeMarcus Lawrence and Randy Gregory will play meaningful roles, but the Cowboys need depth.

Dallas could try to hit the top of the market and go after Olivier Vernon or Mario Williams (assuming the latter is released), but lower-cost, higher-ceiling options make more sense. Somebody like Aldon Smith could be a fit. One fascinating option if he leaves his current team: Giants defensive end Jason Pierre-Paul.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/1...s-Commanders-eagles-giants-make-offseason-nfl
 
Follow those five steps and you guarantee the Cowboys take Ramsey (if available) at #4 or they trade down and take another DB.
 
Someone actually felt compelled to write up a strategy that included Dallas passing on a trade for Murray? Seriously? Dallas wouldn't pay him that contract when he was here, and now after a miserable year that many saw coming, there's a push to trade for that contract?

Somebody send a memo to the Lions to advise them against trading for Suh. Kansas City might have to be talked out of trading for Carr too.
 
I mean, this kinda is Shannahan's scheme to a degree.

We still run power plays and the fact he offers nothing as a receiver makes me want to pass.

You could draft a guy late in the draft that could boom into a superstar.
 
We still run power plays and the fact he offers nothing as a receiver makes me want to pass.

You could draft a guy late in the draft that could boom into a superstar.

I wouldn't mind signing him for cheap and having him as competition for a draft pick RB.
Worst case is you cut him with low penalty, best case is that he becomes a good change of pace for McFadden.
He won't be getting a lot of calls in FA IMO
 
Olivier Vernon this guy would be a good pick up!!. Alfred morris would excel as a RUNNER but I agree with catch on this, he doesn't offer much as a receiver.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BAT
We still run power plays and the fact he offers nothing as a receiver makes me want to pass.

You could draft a guy late in the draft that could boom into a superstar.

Signing Alfred Morris doesn't mean your signing him to be a feature back. He never has to run a pass route. You're signing him to play with Darren McFadden. Morris was an absolute stud when he ran in a zone blocking scheme.

I agree with drafting a kid (in the middle rounds, not late), but I still wouldn't be opposed to signing Morris.
 
I totally forgot about Aldon Smith. I can absolutely see Jerry rolling the dice on Smith and I can't say I would be too upset. He has serious baggage, but that should significantly reduce his price tag. I want nothing to do with JPP.
 
Signing Alfred Morris doesn't mean your signing him to be a feature back. He never has to run a pass route. You're signing him to play with Darren McFadden. Morris was an absolute stud when he ran in a zone blocking scheme.

I agree with drafting a kid (in the middle rounds, not late), but I still wouldn't be opposed to signing Morris.

His best years where when RG3 was QB and teams feared him keeping the ball on those read options. With a traditional QB he has been average at best.
 
I totally forgot about Aldon Smith. I can absolutely see Jerry rolling the dice on Smith and I can't say I would be too upset. He has serious baggage, but that should significantly reduce his price tag. I want nothing to do with JPP.

Smith is suspended and cannot even apply for reinstatement until November. There would be zero point to it.
 
His best years where when RG3 was QB and teams feared him keeping the ball on those read options. With a traditional QB he has been average at best.

Like I said, you're signing the guy to be part of a RBBC approach, not to be a bell cow. I would rather draft someone, but Morris wouldn't be a bad option.
 
No to Alfred Morris.

He's a product to Shannahans scheme and offers nothing in the pass game at all.


Draft a RB.

Agree about Morris. He looks slow and used up.

But I disagree about using any early pick on a running back.
 
Take a look at his productivity over the past four years, and then let me know if it changes your mind.

http://www.nfl.com/player/alfredmorris/2533457/profile

I always look at stats before I post. He had a pretty rough year last year, but so did Matt Jones. Their OL was a mess. Other wise he's averaged over 4 yards a carry each year. Like I've said three times now, I don't bring him in to be a bell cow or feature back. I'd bring him in as a RBBC candidate and still draft a kid in the middle rounds.
 
I agree with all of this. Vernon or williams would be nice. Alfred morris would be so weird with a star
 
I always look at stats before I post. He had a pretty rough year last year, but so did Matt Jones. Their OL was a mess. Other wise he's averaged over 4 yards a carry each year.

Yeah, but it hasn't just been "last year". His production has steadily fallen off a cliff over the past 4 years, in every rushing category. I don't see why anyone would want to waste a dime for that.


Like I've said three times now, I don't bring him in to be a bell cow or feature back. I'd bring him in as a RBBC candidate and still draft a kid in the middle rounds.

So then I have to ask, why bring him in at all?
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,187
Messages
14,519,417
Members
24,208
Latest member
CowboysQC
Back
Top