Rom leads the NFL in most throws over 20 yards with 50 of them. Realize some/many are due to WRs getting good yardage after the catch but a lot of them are also because he's got the ball to them.
One of the biggest concerns in the NFL is the lack of quality QBs. I blame that on those who determine what criteria is most important in identifying QBs to be drafted. Too many experts/scouts demand a QB be 6-3 or above with a very strong arm and a winning attitude, etc. And we see what happens once these guys get drafted. In 2003 Palmer was the #1 overall QB pick; behind him were Leftwich, Grossman and some other winner (sarcasim?). Only Carson has kept his job but he along with all those other QBs have been outperformed by undrafted QB Tony Romo.
The current criteria for identifying good QBs is a joke and indeed the stats now indicate that only 1-3 QBs drafted in first/early rounds will make it in the NFL. Somebody with brains in the NFL better wake up the rest of the bunch. If a strong arm and height are the criteria, go re-sign Jeff George; I understand he's want to come back.
Romo is just as athletic as any of these guys and can make all the throws (but maybe not the 70 yarder). But he can do everything else a whole lot better then all those other so called QB. Last time I checked Eli Manning with his family pedgree, size & arm can't hold a candle to Romo.
I watched Cutler a few weeks against the Packers. For the life of me I couldn't see what the big deal was. Sure he's better then a few NFL QBs (some of whom are god awful) but he looked clumsey, etc. and I wouldn't want to rely on him for a SB anytime soon.
This article is just another attempt (while giving Romo some flowers) to continue supporting an outdated view of identifying QBs. The highest rated QB still today is Tom Brady, a 6th round pick so why were the experts so wrong about him when he physically felt their profile. Geez.