Tabascocat
Dexternjack
- Messages
- 27,538
- Reaction score
- 38,341
Is it possible to go just ONE day without a pro/con Dak thread??? I know, stupid question……carry on
I said he needs to step up against the 49ers in the playoffs. Spin it how you want but that's facts.Sure, but you clearly dont understand WHY. And you dont seem to be able to critique the rest of the offense or the Niners #1 defense.
You seem completely lost on the why or how and simply warp only to the fact that he had a bad game. As if its ONLY up to Dak how he plays.
It shows a complete lack of understanding on your part of the QB position as a whole and how the offense works as a whole.
I don't have Hurts, Jackson or Lawrence that high. So I agree with you moving Lawrence down, you wont get a debate from meAgree with you here but then you have to also move Trevor down the list. Guy had one of the worst half’s of playoff football in history. If it wasn’t for a horribly managed game by the Chargers OC he loses that game and ends with one of the worst playoff performances in nfl history
Take a breath and show me where I said Dak is the only one that gets blame.having the ball in his hands the most, deserves credit and blame
This is by far one of more laughable quotes in regards to reasoning behind blaming ONLY the QB for wins and losses.
"Duh, he handles the ball the most"
I never said he had to torch them but turning the ball over is something you can't do. That's why I said he needs to step up against the 49ers.Outside of Patrick Mahomes (who we all agree is the best of the best), how many QBs do you think would've torched the 49ers in that game, with the weapons (or lack thereof) that Dak had?
Aaron Rodgers also couldn't get past this 49ers defense. They're ridiculously good.
I was disappointed with how Dak played too, but I'm also realistic. He's a good-but-not-elite QB, on the road against the #1 defense and with zero RB threat once Pollard went down. What we got is what I expected.
The most disappointing play of that game was the near-pick-6 dropped by Dre Greenlaw. Just a horrible decision by Dak and one that should've ended any comeback hopes.
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...king-top-100-players-predictions-stats-quotes
QBs that made their top 100...
1. Mahomes
2. Hurts
3. Burrow
4. Allen
5. Herbert
6. Lawrence
7. Jackson
8. Rodgers
9. Prescott
10. Tagovailoa
11. Goff
12. Cousins
Oh and this offseason, NFL players, coaches and execs all independently voted Dak among the top 10 QBs as well.
So people who are paid to know this sport universally believe Dak's pretty good.
All the people dissing Hurts because of his supporting cast are also dissing the legacy of Troy. Troy had the best O-line of his day, the best running back (or 2nd best if you like Sanders), a great receiving duo, a damn good tight end, and a great coach. And that defense was pretty darn good IIRC. So if Hurts ends up with a few Super Bowls, will the narrative change?This Lawrence love is ridiculous. Hes an up and comer no doubt, but he hasnt shown he is better than Dak. Jackson no thanks. I would love to see what Hurts would do without the best offensive supporting cast in NFL history. No way is he #2. Although I see him having another sick year stats wise.
Ok so show me your football knowledge and tell me WHY he had a bad game. At least tell me the "excuses" as you like to call them.I said he needs to step up against the 49ers in the playoffs. Spin it how you want but that's facts.
You're agreeing he had a bad game but trying to make excuses and then tell me I don't know anything or lack understanding.
No thats 100% false. He shouldnt get most of the credit and shouldnt get most of the blame. But this is a common mistake by football and QB challenged fans.Take a breath and show me where I said Dak is the only one that gets blame.
Literally just before I said that I said I get he isn't the only one to blame, however he does get the most blame as he should. Same thing with the credit, he should get most of the credit
Yep you know the answer. Rampant fragility with these folks.Is it possible to go just ONE day without a pro/con Dak thread??? I know, stupid question……carry on
He threw 4 picks in one half of football. If Dak did that. There would be 100 posts on the first page. Make no mistake about that.Why can’t it also be that the Jags OC horribly managed in the first half? Trevor is a great QB. Make no mistake about that.
Maybe not if, in his 2nd year he did that, and then led his team all the way back for the playoff win with 4 TDs and a 2pt conversion.He threw 4 picks in one half of football. If Dak did that. There would be 100 posts on the first page. Make no mistake about that.
You must not spend a lot of time here after wins if Dak has a bad gameMaybe not if, in his 2nd year he did that and then led his team all the way back for the playoff win.
They are won by good QB's surrounded by elite talent typically. Elite QB's dont do squat without great players around them. And you typically need to throw in good coaching on top of it all.9 seems about right to me.
Could he win a championship- yes.
Will he win a championship- probably not.
Super-bowls are generally won (but not always) by elite QB's.
Are you saying that based on potential?Why can’t it also be that the Jags OC horribly managed in the first half? Trevor is a great QB. Make no mistake about that.
This is all that needs to be said in regards to NFL quarterbacks and championships.Super-bowls are generally won (but not always) by elite QB's.