ESPN picks the GOAT at every offensive position: Larry Allen selected at Guard

aikemirv

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,394
Reaction score
9,991
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...erback-running-back-receiver-offensive-tackle

"No offensive lineman better encapsulates the 1990s than Allen, and no offensive guard better highlights what elite play at the position means than the 11-time Pro Bowler and seven-time All-Pro. Allen was the perfect combination of brute strength, agility, poise and violence at the point of attack. He's the prototype by which I evaluate offensive guard play. -- Matt Miller, NFL draft analyst"

FYI - Emmitt finished 4th behind Jim Brown, Barry Sanders, and Walter Payton
I don't really mind where Emmitt placed but I see no reason for Barry Sanders getting #2 over Walter Payton.
 

Creeper

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,510
Reaction score
19,652
Emmitt gets screwed in these polls because the critics credit the offensive line. And, yes, Emmitt had some good offensive linemen in front of him, but not all were great and his OL changed from year to year. Emmitt was the constant. What him run, he made a lot of plays on his own. Emmitt did not get all those career yards behind a great OL. He got a lot of them because he had great vision, great balance, excellent feet, and maybe the biggest heart in football. People forget Emmitt was great at every level he played. He belongs in the top 2.
 

G2

Taco Engineer
Messages
24,981
Reaction score
26,564
No brainer. Allen was among the best players to ever play in Dallas.
 

TwentyOne

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,548
Reaction score
5,198
To have Allen at #1 guard is one thing. But to not even mention Martin just shows us how great Allen was.
 

Big_D

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,204
Reaction score
15,498
Emmitt gets screwed in these polls because the critics credit the offensive line. And, yes, Emmitt had some good offensive linemen in front of him, but not all were great and his OL changed from year to year. Emmitt was the constant. What him run, he made a lot of plays on his own. Emmitt did not get all those career yards behind a great OL. He got a lot of them because he had great vision, great balance, excellent feet, and maybe the biggest heart in football. People forget Emmitt was great at every level he played. He belongs in the top 2.

no doubt about it. The durability, the longevity, the heart and determination and his blocking ability on top of it. Crediting the “great” Oline is a huge disservice to a great RB who owns and earned every record.
 

Haimerej

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,083
Reaction score
6,776
Emmitt gets screwed in these polls because the critics credit the offensive line. And, yes, Emmitt had some good offensive linemen in front of him, but not all were great and his OL changed from year to year. Emmitt was the constant. What him run, he made a lot of plays on his own. Emmitt did not get all those career yards behind a great OL. He got a lot of them because he had great vision, great balance, excellent feet, and maybe the biggest heart in football. People forget Emmitt was great at every level he played. He belongs in the top 2.

Nobody ever talks about Jim Brown's line, either. He ran behind more Hall of Famers than Emmitt did.
 

Red Dragon

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,395
Reaction score
3,773
5 Larry Allen's on the offensive line and we would have won 5 Super Bowls in a row
 

MapleLeaf

Maple Leaf
Messages
5,163
Reaction score
1,552
John Hannah was one of the best offensive guard to have ever played. It is very fitting he was recognized on the list. He came in second but I would not have minded him being listed 1B to Allen's 1A.

Those are two fabulous names in the Guard category. For me it was Larry though. The violence at the point of attack was something we rarely witnessed.

It's what makes me so mad at Erik Williams. He and Larry were like twins in violent offensive line play. Erik should have been a multiple pro-bowler and HOFer.
 

MapleLeaf

Maple Leaf
Messages
5,163
Reaction score
1,552
5 Larry Allen's on the offensive line and we would have won 5 Super Bowls in a row

With (5) Larry Allens on a Cowboys line this would have resulted in the league stepping in to create rules for distribution.

No way a team could ever have that many riches, and be let to run with it in a parity driven league.

And you are right. We would have had way more attendances at the big dance.
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
54,209
Reaction score
32,605
Allen was so physically dominant that it was no secret that he punished opposing defenders to tears during the course of a game. Tears. Enough said. -- Chris Mortensen, NFL insider
 

Thomas82

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,610
Reaction score
3,393
Emmitt gets screwed in these polls because the critics credit the offensive line. And, yes, Emmitt had some good offensive linemen in front of him, but not all were great and his OL changed from year to year. Emmitt was the constant. What him run, he made a lot of plays on his own. Emmitt did not get all those career yards behind a great OL. He got a lot of them because he had great vision, great balance, excellent feet, and maybe the biggest heart in football. People forget Emmitt was great at every level he played. He belongs in the top 2.

Oh yeah, and several of his linemen were holdovers from the 1-15 team.
 

Risen Star

Likes Collector
Messages
89,012
Reaction score
211,098
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Just imagine how much better Allen would be if he got to practice against our DTs now.

Iron sharpens Iron.
 
Top