ESPN: The List: Five Suggested Rule Changes

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,278
Reaction score
45,637
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
The List: Cap break for veterans?

By Eric Allen
ESPN.com
Archive

The NFL is constantly tweaking its rules and with that in mind, here are five rule changes -- both on and off the field -- I'd like to see:

1. I'd like to see the salary cap tweaked so that veterans -- especially guys who have played with one team for a long time -- are taken better care of. It would be great if there was some special cap relief where a player could be paid over the cap amount after a certain length of service with one team.

2. A better health care and disability program must be instituted. We're seeing what players are going through after their careers are over and it's silly to assume that they are able to afford the myriad doctor's bills that are essentially the result of their careers.

3. Relaxed defensive pass interference penalties. It's time that the league thinks about changing the way it calls pass interference on the defense. Instead of having it be a spot of the foul call and an automatic first down, I'd like to see the NFL institute 15-yard and five-yard penalties for pass interference. Similar to how facemask penalties are called, there should be an option for a five-yard penalty with no first down in addition to the 15-yard penalty.


4. The NFL and NFLPA have to come up with a solution to help stem the concussion situation. Maybe it's time for a new helmet.

5. Players should return to picking the Pro Bowl participants. Too often, undeserving players are given the honor because they make enough noise to garner attention instead of producing on the field.

LINK
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
WoodysGirl;1408665 said:
The List: Cap break for veterans?

By Eric Allen
ESPN.com
Archive

The NFL is constantly tweaking its rules and with that in mind, here are five rule changes -- both on and off the field -- I'd like to see:

1. I'd like to see the salary cap tweaked so that veterans -- especially guys who have played with one team for a long time -- are taken better care of. It would be great if there was some special cap relief where a player could be paid over the cap amount after a certain length of service with one team.

2. A better health care and disability program must be instituted. We're seeing what players are going through after their careers are over and it's silly to assume that they are able to afford the myriad doctor's bills that are essentially the result of their careers.

3. Relaxed defensive pass interference penalties. It's time that the league thinks about changing the way it calls pass interference on the defense. Instead of having it be a spot of the foul call and an automatic first down, I'd like to see the NFL institute 15-yard and five-yard penalties for pass interference. Similar to how facemask penalties are called, there should be an option for a five-yard penalty with no first down in addition to the 15-yard penalty.


4. The NFL and NFLPA have to come up with a solution to help stem the concussion situation. Maybe it's time for a new helmet.

5. Players should return to picking the Pro Bowl participants. Too often, undeserving players are given the honor because they make enough noise to garner attention instead of producing on the field.

LINK

I agree on each of the 5 ideals
 

adamc91115

New Member
Messages
738
Reaction score
0
I agree with all of them except the 3rd one about PI. That is a terrible idea. Say someone is flat out beat on a 60 yard pass, if they're just going to get 15 yards regardless, whats to stop them from just blatantly shoving the receiver?
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
Pass interference is a stupid idea. If you get beat 40 yards downfield, and can't locate the ball, just tackle the guy. At least they'll only get 15. :rolleyes:
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
WoodysGirl;1408665 said:
3. Relaxed defensive pass interference penalties. It's time that the league thinks about changing the way it calls pass interference on the defense. Instead of having it be a spot of the foul call and an automatic first down, I'd like to see the NFL institute 15-yard and five-yard penalties for pass interference. Similar to how facemask penalties are called, there should be an option for a five-yard penalty with no first down in addition to the 15-yard penalty.http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=allen_eric&id=2788420
Instead of 15 or 5-yards depending on flagrancy, it should be spot of the foul or 15-yards depending on flagrancy.
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
Eric Allen is looking for the Larry Bird rule of the NBA. It would have been nice if Dallas would have kept Emmitt, but the truth was that he was not worth it at that point in his career. He was better than Hambrick, but Troy was a lot cheaper than Emmitt. A rule that would have enabled Dallas to spend the money and keep Emmitt would not really have ultimately helped Dallas. It just would have given them a chance to provide a nice ending to his career. That doesn't win games in most cases.

A new helmet can be a good thing. The NFL keeps working on it. It isn't as if they are ignoring the problem, but it is something that is not completly understood.

Players and coaches suck at picking pro-bowl spots just like the fans. There is no good system for it. I have read plenty of interviews and comments from players where they pay little attention to who they are voting for.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
superpunk;1408674 said:
Pass interference is a stupid idea. If you get beat 40 yards downfield, and can't locate the ball, just tackle the guy. At least they'll only get 15. :rolleyes:

It just gets old seeing a 40 or 50 yard penalty for some ticky tack contact that in many cases is caused by the WR. I think they can use a form of flagrant and non flagrant fouls when dealing with PI.
 

adamc91115

New Member
Messages
738
Reaction score
0
theogt;1408677 said:
Instead of 15 or 5-yards depending on flagrancy, it should be spot of the foul or 15-yards depending on flagrancy.

Thats a little better, but I would still avoid the set yardage on PI. That would just force more decisions on the officials, was it on purpose or not? Add that to the question of was it even a penalty or not, people would be going mad. It would just add more controversy, it should be left as is.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
WoodysGirl;1408665 said:
5. Players should return to picking the Pro Bowl participants. Too often, undeserving players are given the honor because they make enough noise to garner attention instead of producing on the field.
Then again, sometimes deserving players aren't given the honor because the players or coaches don't like them.
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,278
Reaction score
45,637
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
theogt;1408677 said:
Instead of 15 or 5-yards depending on flagrancy, it should be spot of the foul or 15-yards depending on flagrancy.
That makes more sense...and I'm not sure why Allen didn't suggest that vs the 5 and 15 yrd penalties..
 

percyhoward

Research Tool
Messages
17,062
Reaction score
21,861
WoodysGirl;1408665 said:
3. Relaxed defensive pass interference penalties. It's time that the league thinks about changing the way it calls pass interference on the defense. Instead of having it be a spot of the foul call and an automatic first down, I'd like to see the NFL institute 15-yard and five-yard penalties for pass interference. Similar to how facemask penalties are called, there should be an option for a five-yard penalty with no first down in addition to the 15-yard penalty.
LINK
Whatever they do with PI, they need to make it reviewable by instant replay. There are just too many variables (was the contact past 5 yards? was the ball in the air? was the ball catchable? was it just contact, or was it holding?) for it not to be reviewable.

They could give each team one "non-possession" type challenge per half, which would be used for PI's.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
I agree that PI should be flagrant or not- and then go from 5 yds, to 15, to spot of the foul. Incidental is 5 yds, real contact is 15, and flagrant is spot of the foul.
the veterans rule would be great. A real reward for teams that draft well.
Just confining it to talking about Emmitts situation is just lame.
And as regards teh Pro Bowl- NO ONE OUTSIDE OF PLAYERS AND COACHES SHOULD EVER VOTE.
New helmet- with the advances in technology and the like, there is no excuse.
Any players pre 1980 should be covered by the NFL for all playing responsible maladies for life.
 

Doomsday

Rising Star
Messages
20,224
Reaction score
16,866
adamc91115;1408673 said:
I agree with all of them except the 3rd one about PI. That is a terrible idea. Say someone is flat out beat on a 60 yard pass, if they're just going to get 15 yards regardless, whats to stop them from just blatantly shoving the receiver?

I agree but they do need to tweak the rules a bit. There are too many times when offenses just throw it upand get bailed out by questionable calls.
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
I don't think defensive holding should be an automatic first down, though.

Too many tiems you see a team in 3rd and 13, and they decide to not come after the QB, and because some corner clutched at a WR who wasn't involved in the play, they get 5 yards and a first down.
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
burmafrd;1408691 said:
I agree that PI should be flagrant or not- and then go from 5 yds, to 15, to spot of the foul. Incidental is 5 yds, real contact is 15, and flagrant is spot of the foul.
the veterans rule would be great. A real reward for teams that draft well.
Just confining it to talking about Emmitts situation is just lame.

Thanks for reinforcing that I am lame. :D

A rule change like that would only affect one or two players per team. We are talking about an exemption to the salary cap, so a team that drafts well could not be allowed to exempt several players to circumvent the cap.

Emmitt is probably not the best example, but he is a decent one. How about Larry Allen? :D
 

adamc91115

New Member
Messages
738
Reaction score
0
Doomsday;1408692 said:
I agree but they do need to tweak the rules a bit. There are too many times when offenses just throw it upand get bailed out by questionable calls.

I agree, something does need to be changed with the PI calls. Like someone else said, maybe instant replay for PI would help.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
WoodysGirl;1408665 said:
3. Relaxed defensive pass interference penalties. It's time that the league thinks about changing the way it calls pass interference on the defense. Instead of having it be a spot of the foul call and an automatic first down, I'd like to see the NFL institute 15-yard and five-yard penalties for pass interference. Similar to how facemask penalties are called, there should be an option for a five-yard penalty with no first down in addition to the 15-yard penalty.

Problem with this is, if you are beat deep or clueless to where the ball is you can just tackle the receiver and only take a 15 yard penalty instead of a 55 yard TD pass (or puting you in field goal range) when time is expiring.
 

fanfromvirginia

Inconceivable!
Messages
4,014
Reaction score
164
I disagree with the first suggestion. It's well intentioned but as written would have the opposite effect of harming vets by depriving themof jobs. On the salary cap or no, management would be asked to pay more for veterans, which would cause them to opt for the lower-priced youngsters.

Much like the veteran minimum, must-have veterans would be marginally helped, low-need veterans would be irreparably harmed. Net effect: veterans lose more than they gain.

More lessons in supply and demand.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
Another change I would like to see is teams allowed to dress the entire 53 man roster instead of the 45 man roster. I just think if your paying them they should be dressed on game day.
 
Top