big dog cowboy;2106560 said:For those ESPN guys who ranked these players and rip TO I have a question.
#2 on the list is a player who admits he takes plays off.
So which is worse, a player with a few drops or a player takes plays off?
big dog cowboy;2106560 said:For those ESPN guys who ranked these players and rip TO I have a question.
#2 on the list is a player who admits he takes plays off.
So which is worse, a player with a few drops or a player takes plays off?
Q_the_man;2107221 said:Moss has always been better than TO and I like TO alot, but take away Moss 2 years in Oakland and put him on any other team in the league his stats would be even better.....Moss is a great talent and would have loved to had draft him, TO is also a great player but he does drop to many passes, where as Moss makes catches look like catching a tennis ball by urself....
gazmc_06;2107288 said:Mcnabb pre-Owens, Mcnabb with Owens...it works the same. Brady won three superbowls without Moss.
It's not homerism.
DaBoys4Life;2107640 said:Jerry Rice Chris Carte two best WR ever. Irvin TO and Harrison can round out the rest of my top 5. Look at these guys stats they are all HOF and when they retire they will have better numbers than every1 but Rice.
NextGenBoys;2108892 said:Moss may not be the best receiver, but he's the most dominant. You cant argue that.
The guy is 6'4 who can outrun most corners, and can jump over most safeties coming to double team him. He may not run the best routes, or be tough over the middle, but he is the most dominating receiver in football. Point blank.