AKATheRake
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,968
- Reaction score
- 2,963
jterrell;5054054 said:Let me see if I can confuse you more. lol.
We've had 1 Techs here for years in the 3-4. We haven't had any 3 Techs.
At least by scheme. We played 5.1.5 along the front (Ware and Spencer were 7s) --admittedly Hatcher may have played some true 3 tech under Wade who allowed guys to just do what they do best scheme or no scheme.
Ratliff is a 1 and wants to die(or at least retire) a 1. Lissemore is a back up 1. Brent is an ideal 1 except he'll be in jail covering his number 2. But he may be back in a year. If we get 2 years of Ratliff, have Lissemore as depth and get Brent back in a year, 1 isn't really much of a need at all. Especially considering we have a bunch of 7th rounders doing the job.
In the Tampa 2, the 4-3 3Tech is the dude. He is the pass rusher and inside force. That's really, really hard to find. If you think Sheldon Richardson can do that and don't take him your(i.e. whatever GM) nuts.
End of the day if I saw Vince Wilfolk here as the 1 I'd jump on that. I don;t though. The best of the 1's is probably Sly Williams and to me he is a 1 who wants to be a 3.
Very nice post. Makes a lot of sense.