You have a knack for stupid commentary. I don't know if it's nature (recessive genes) or nurture (late night sneaky Uncle, dropped on head). I do know you are hurting the board's median post IQ with every submission.
There is a certain board subset to which you apparently belong that can only handle binary game analysis - win good, lose bad. But there are those of us who also look to various aspects of the game for deeper insight into the team. You'll recognize us by looking for complete sentences, unfamiliar forms of punctuation, and members whose parents were married when we were born. Take the time to allow us our silly notion that winning is directly related to those particulars that we like to look for from time to time beyond JUST winning. Because believe it or not, how well you play in the three important phases of the game (what you consider "style points") is, indeed, DIRECTLY RELATED to winning games, and you will find that concomitant relationship isn't random or fleeting, rather fairly bedrock - teams that don't do one, don't do the other.
The cars driving in the street are really made of marshmallow, go get a bite of one...