Explaining Romo's sack

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,008
Reaction score
37,150
I think there are some misconceptions about the sack Romo took yesterday, based mainly on the announcers talking about Austin being wide-open in the back of the end zone and replays showing Bryant coming open.

Quarterbacks are taught that they need to try to get the ball out of their hands in 3 seconds. That means they have to progress through their reads and made a decision where to go with the ball. before those 3 seconds are up.

Those decisions generally start with a preread of the defense as to whom the quarterback is going to look to first when he goes through his progressions. Using Bryant as an example since they showed his route on replay, you can see that he initially was covered for about 2 seconds then came open over the top. It's likely that Romo had moved to his next read by then, and then to his next read and to his next read. I assume none of the other options were open at the time Romo checked.

That meant Romo needed to check down to the outlet receiver, which was Murray, who had ran a wheel route to the left and was initially wide open. However, after getting wide open, Murray just stopped his route, which allowed a linebacker to notice him and head his way about the time Romo needed to check down. It appeared on the sideline after the play that Romo was telling Murray he needed to continue his route either upfield or back over the middle in front of the quarterback.

Since Murray didn't continue his route and the coverage was coming, Romo started moving upfield. He might have been preparing for a throw to either Bryant or Austin at that point, but a lineman had finally broken free and Romo chose to take the sack rather than risk the possibility of having his arm hit while attempting to throw. That was the right play by Romo.

If people want to harp on a certain player being open, then what you are asking the quarterback to do is to not go through his reads to find an open man, but just continue to follow that one player until he gets open, which is a good way to get into lots of trouble.
 

stiletto

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,499
Reaction score
15,072
Romo should be throwing the ball away instead of taking a rookie sack like that. I guess at this point there is no hope in him changing his ways, he is the type of player who always thinks he can make a play. He is what he is....
 

SDCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,763
Reaction score
22,734
There's not much to explain. If he didn't see anyone open, it should have been thrown away. It's not the end of the world either way.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,846
Reaction score
16,869
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Romo should be throwing the ball away instead of taking a rookie sack like that. I guess at this point there is no hope in him changing his ways, he is the type of player who always thinks he can make a play. He is what he is....

That sack actually came out of nowhere on Romo's blind side while he was looking for his outlet and he took the sack.

Now, if he had tried to just throw it away or tried to make some other type of play and the ball got INT'ed, then Romo would be the goat. He is what he is...
 

Gemini Dolly

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,391
Reaction score
1,400
This is how Romo explained it.

one play when Romo had a lot of time, he failed to find wide receiver Miles Austin who was wide open in the end zone.

“He’s the last read on the play,” Romo said. “At the time, I went through everybody and as I was getting ready to get back to him I saw [Jason] Witten and it was going to kind of be one of those close ones to fit in. At that point you’d love to say you’re going to look at the opposite side of the field and do all of that, but it doesn’t quite work like that sometimes.”

========
Romo doesnt like to throw the ball away, but if that comes up again, I hope he does.
 

FiveRings

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,782
Reaction score
247
Is it me or is there more talk about that preseason than the last pass he threw last season?
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,846
Reaction score
16,869
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
This is how Romo explained it.

one play when Romo had a lot of time, he failed to find wide receiver Miles Austin who was wide open in the end zone.

“He’s the last read on the play,” Romo said. “At the time, I went through everybody and as I was getting ready to get back to him I saw [Jason] Witten and it was going to kind of be one of those close ones to fit in. At that point you’d love to say you’re going to look at the opposite side of the field and do all of that, but it doesn’t quite work like that sometimes.”

========
Romo doesnt like to throw the ball away, but if that comes up again, I hope he does.
Is it me or is there more talk about that preseason than the last pass he threw last season?


It's kind of the same thing. Romo took a sack this time and did not try to throw it to someone to make a big play. I'm actually glad he took the sack, maybe he learned to either take the sack or throw it away if you cannot make a play...and he took a sack and the Cowboys kept the ball.
 

nalam

The realist
Messages
11,910
Reaction score
7,157
Romo should be throwing the ball away instead of taking a rookie sack like that. I guess at this point there is no hope in him changing his ways, he is the type of player who always thinks he can make a play. He is what he is....

Amen bro !

Same thing I mentioned in the nitpicks thread.
 

bayeslife

187beatdown
Messages
9,461
Reaction score
8,584
Romo can't throw the ball away when he's inside the hashes or its intentional grounding. He should have tucked and ran but of course its easy to say what he should have done. Taking a sack > turnover
 

TwoDeep3

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,506
Reaction score
17,339
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
He held the ball too long. As swervy as he is, he could have moved away from the tackle box and tossed it out of bounds.

Where was the internal clock telling him time was running out?
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,846
Reaction score
16,869
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
He held the ball too long. As swervy as he is, he could have moved away from the tackle box and tossed it out of bounds.

Where was the internal clock telling him time was running out?

You would have to ask Romo that, I don't know. But, if you look at the play, there was not really anyone around him at the time and all of a sudden the linebacker came into the picture and hit him.

If Romo would have done the same thing in the Washington game last year and take the sack, he might have lived to fight another play.

But, also you might look at all the time that Romo was having! The oline was giving him tons of time so maybe he thought he has time this time to make a play? The good thing about that play was that it was not a play that lost the game.
 

TwoDeep3

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,506
Reaction score
17,339
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
You would have to ask Romo that, I don't know. But, if you look at the play, there was not really anyone around him at the time and all of a sudden the linebacker came into the picture and hit him.

If Romo would have done the same thing in the Washington game last year and take the sack, he might have lived to fight another play.

But, also you might look at all the time that Romo was having! The oline was giving him tons of time so maybe he thought he has time this time to make a play? The good thing about that play was that it was not a play that lost the game.

I saw the play. I considered everything you mentioned.

But the clock in his head should have told him to move long before he did. The angle of the tackler did surprise him. But he stood there watching down field way longer than normal and that should trigger something in his head to get going.

So in your "if" scenario that you tossed out....what if he was injured for holding the ball too long and was lost for the season?

The facts are what they are.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,846
Reaction score
16,869
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I saw the play. I considered everything you mentioned.

But the clock in his head should have told him to move long before he did. The angle of the tackler did surprise him. But he stood there watching down field way longer than normal and that should trigger something in his head to get going.

So in your "if" scenario that you tossed out....what if he was injured for holding the ball too long and was lost for the season?

The facts are what they are.

Well, he was not injured, so you can forget about that. I'm not Romo or his Coach.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
When should he have thrown it away?

Here?

qNRznKS.jpg


Oh, no. Not then, that's perfect protection.

Here?

ueHQzJn.jpg


Well, uh, why would he throw it away then?

Here?

xfsLzAF.jpg


*scratches head* No, that can't be right? There's no one even close to him.

Here?

c2cMWbK.jpg


Yes, this is when he should have thrown it away -- the point when a linebacker comes flying full speed from out of his line of sight giving him literally milliseconds to release the ball. /sarcasm

The guy came out of nowhere. He couldn't have possibly seen him. You don't throw the ball away when there's no one near you, just because ... well... you've been standing in a clean pocket for a while.
 

TwoDeep3

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,506
Reaction score
17,339
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Well, he was not injured, so you can forget about that. I'm not Romo or his Coach.

Just like you can forget about the idea of the interception you used to defend Romo's decision. I think that was my point. Rushing out and playing what if is a game I enjoy. But when it is used to avert eyes on the facts of the matter, I find that difficult to become engaged.
 

TwoDeep3

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,506
Reaction score
17,339
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
When should he have thrown it away?

You don't throw the ball away when there's no one near you, just because ... well... you've been standing in a clean pocket for a while.

Really?

Note he is STILL looking down field. At what point does he reel in his Spidey senses and start looking for danger?

Nice photos. Gaping hole if head was on a swivel because as he moved he began moving lateral to the line of scrimmage which caused the linebacker to get an angle.

He took the sack that was not required. Too bad you guys don't have footage of him having to turn around a t-shirt he put on backwards while getting dressed for the game. I would really like to see the usual suspects come rushing to his defense for that cause.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
YA RLY!!

Note he is STILL looking down field. At what point does he reel in his Spidey senses and start looking for danger?
Never. The QB should never be looking to his sides or behind him. If he is, he's toast and the play is over.

Nice photos. Gaping hole if head was on a swivel because as he moved he began moving lateral to the line of scrimmage which caused the linebacker to get an angle.

He took the sack that was not required. Too bad you guys don't have footage of him having to turn around a t-shirt he put on backwards while getting dressed for the game. I would really like to see the usual suspects come rushing to his defense for that cause.
The best decision there would have been to tuck it and run. But I guess he saw something because he was getting ready to launch it. There's no way he (i) should have known that defender was coming at that speed or (ii) gotten rid of the ball by the time he did realize it.
 

perrykemp

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,503
Reaction score
9,274
Aaron Rodgers has the highest QB rating in NFL history partially because he <chooses> to take sacks exactly like this instead of attempting low percentage passes.

It's a helleva better than an INT.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,008
Reaction score
37,150
This is how Romo explained it.

one play when Romo had a lot of time, he failed to find wide receiver Miles Austin who was wide open in the end zone.

“He’s the last read on the play,” Romo said. “At the time, I went through everybody and as I was getting ready to get back to him I saw [Jason] Witten and it was going to kind of be one of those close ones to fit in. At that point you’d love to say you’re going to look at the opposite side of the field and do all of that, but it doesn’t quite work like that sometimes.”

========
Romo doesnt like to throw the ball away, but if that comes up again, I hope he does.

It's similar. I didn't know what option Austin was on the play or who he was targeting right before the sack, but the main thing people have to realize is that just because a receiver is wide open, it doesn't mean he was a second ago when the quarterback was looking for him.

I'm guessing that his first read on this play was Bryant, and the corner was in good position at the time Romo looked his way.

I also didn't expect Romo to call out Murray, but based on their sideline talk, it was clear he was expecting something different from him.

I certainly don't mind those who say Romo should have thrown the ball away, but I have no problem with him trying to make a play when the protection is there then taking a sack like that when a player comes free. He protected the ball and didn't force anything, those are the important things.
 
Top