Few Pickens nuggets

A percentage goes to his agent. Plus you pay state taxes based on where you play the game, not where you reside. So half of his games are out of state and he pays tax on them based on what state the game is played in. It's called the "Jock Tax" rule.

https://globallawexperts.com/david-...-jock-tax-how-state-taxes-affect-nfl-players/

Not saying it isn't a lot of money, just that it is not as simple or as much as you made it out to be.
Well, its not too bad as long as you are not playing too many games in NY and California. That makes the tax guy you pick pretty important as well.
so say 15% less then what I was figuring. Still anyone claiming he is not set for life after this coming season is full of it.
 
Well….maybe, just maybe….he sees what taking a little less in NY did for Jalen Brunson. The entire city of NY is going to respect that man tomorrow morning, and he is still gonna get his big bag in the end. Same could happen in Dallas for him.

I’m not even an NBA fan so I’m not at all rubbing it in to my fellow Cowboys fans who also are into the Mavs hard. I’m just dreaming that we can keep that WR duo long term somehow.
 
Okay.....so why didn't the Cowboys sign him earlier?

If he is not going to be an attitude problem then what was the problem?

I'm glad that is cleared up but it brings up a whole new set of questions as to why a long-term contract wasn't done.
 
His agent obviously talked to him, and Pickens listened and understands the situation. That's to his credit.

This year will be about playing good football and rebuilding a reputation.

If he can do that, maybe somebody will commit longer term in the offseason.
His agent is the reason he missed OTAs. Like most agents of players who are tagged, he advised Pickens to miss, according to Pickens.
 
Okay.....so why didn't the Cowboys sign him earlier?

If he is not going to be an attitude problem then what was the problem?

I'm glad that is cleared up but it brings up a whole new set of questions as to why a long-term contract wasn't done.
I don't think it's that easy to say he's not going to be an attitude problem. He was traded last year for lower value than his on-field ability because his team felt he was an attitude problem. Dallas has one year of behavior to go on, and that behavior included being late for some meetings and doing some things on the field to draw unnecessary penalties. A long-term contract wasn't done because the front office wants to see how he will behave on the tag.
 
A percentage goes to his agent. Plus you pay state taxes based on where you play the game, not where you reside. So half of his games are out of state and he pays tax on them based on what state the game is played in. It's called the "Jock Tax" rule.

https://globallawexperts.com/david-...-jock-tax-how-state-taxes-affect-nfl-players/

Not saying it isn't a lot of money, just that it is not as simple or as much as you made it out to be.
Gimme rich people problems over poor people problems..
 
A percentage goes to his agent. Plus you pay state taxes based on where you play the game, not where you reside. So half of his games are out of state and he pays tax on them based on what state the game is played in. It's called the "Jock Tax" rule.

https://globallawexperts.com/david-...-jock-tax-how-state-taxes-affect-nfl-players/

Not saying it isn't a lot of money, just that it is not as simple or as much as you made it out to be.
Pennsylvania, and probably other states. Calls sports players as entertainers. Not sure if they have a different tax category for that since many will only play a limited amount of games there.
Such as NFL players some will only play one time. As opposed to Baseball, may 6 games. Same for out of state players in Hockey, Basketball.

Or maybe the standard state taxes. However when I worked out of state, I could file a state return, and got quite a bit of that tax money back.
Which is why I wonder, working on a W-2, though on contract for 6 months or even a year is treated differently as n "entertainer".

Will get to the article in a bit. That may answer some of my questions.
 
Okay.....so why didn't the Cowboys sign him earlier?

If he is not going to be an attitude problem then what was the problem?

I'm glad that is cleared up but it brings up a whole new set of questions as to why a long-term contract wasn't done.
Him not being signed long term has NOTHING to do with the cap. It's about guaranteed money. Lamb got 100M, Pickens got 27M. They simply do not want to pay another player that much guaranteed money.

They'll tell you it's hard to pay two players at WR, but again, what's hard about it? If It's not about the cap, what's the problem? They don't want to dish out the money.
 
Every off-season, there are stories about players missing OTA's, you just have to open your eyes and read about it....so many on here take Cowboys stories as being personal for this reason. Goodness, the Giants had a controversial player sit out.....you guys are too much woe is me about this team
Oh no not like the Dallas Cowboys one don't want me to open up my eyes I do watch plenty of ESPN and Good Morning Football along with all the Bleacher Report and the push notifications I get from Twitter yes there are some small stories when a guy misses Not like stories let's just say uh the 2023 training camp where they counted every single mistake that Prescott made every fumble they counted his interception and reported on ESPN everybody was talking about how bad a year he was going to have until they had to shut up because when it happened he played one of his best years it should have been the MVP that is the stories I'm talking about..

Literally right around March when the rumor was that Dallas was gonna tag Pickens there was at least a story every day for about 3 weeks about how they felt George Pickens was gonna hold out and this is going to be a mess if it's going to turn into persons then the store switched around the draft that he was probably gonna get traded he demanded the trade Oh guess what none of that was true but there were stories on it you remember the reporter that backtrack and apologize for making that up because he assumed it was going to happen,,

Then after that none of that happened then the stories were well you're gonna definitely not sign the tag he's gonna do his best to find trade partner before the season starts then he signed the tag everyone was wrong about that then it was uh oh it's not a voluntary workouts and he's gonna do hold in this man is gonna hold in and then hold out and it's gonna be a mess..


That wasn't true None of it was true these are the stories I'm talking about there were at least 15 different narratives being created to try to ruffle feathers and create drama because people seem to feed on this kind of drama and when it doesn't happen they seem very disappointed..

So small stories and mentions are not what I'm talking about they made this into a giant story that never was it was fiction..

Now don't you pay attention the fact I'm telling you they made this into a giant thing because they thought was headed down the road it pars headed down and they were all wrong and it should've never happened...

Would you like me to go screenshot every post about George since March and most of it was all hogwash wrong would you like to show you how bad this was spinning when there was nothing to spin?


I bet you'd be shocked to go back to March and then look at every page and do a search for the stories about George you'd find out it's almost as crazy as about the ones about Prescott and jerry it was coming up hard on catching up them on ridiculousness especially for one guy who constantly posted about George because he was hoping that would happen..

But thanks for telling me I need to open my eye and apparently you just missed all those ridiculous unnecessary posts..
 
Him not being signed long term has NOTHING to do with the cap. It's about guaranteed money. Lamb got 100M, Pickens got 27M. They simply do not want to pay another player that much guaranteed money.

They'll tell you it's hard to pay two players at WR, but again, what's hard about it? If It's not about the cap, what's the problem? They don't want to dish out the money.
Actually it was smart move It does have a little to do with the I mean the money that I'm getting has been pushed couple of times in restructures meaning his dead cap he's already been prepaid a lot of bonus money you can't get rid of him and you're right you can't pick two receivers that kind of money And anybody who's getting angry that Jay didn't sign him early do you remember what happened with players like Russell Wilson was traded for with a lot of resources before he played a snap they handed a ridiculous amount of money, Same with the D.watson.

There's a reason we got George Pickens for a 3rd round pick he came with a reputation he needs to pair and you're not hiding the man that kind of money without seeing it and it's not production on the field alone it is all of it...

The Cowboys never intended to give him a long-term deal after one year regardless of how good was and if he was really that good if he was considered one of the best of the league like he feels he is and he might be,

No team would have hesitated to give what Cowboys would need just two first round picks we go around the league for the last ten years find deals with that all the time tell the Cowboys got two 1st round picks and a player for parsons and then they handed Parsons a $46 million deal, yes, it happens.



People are saying oh poor George didn't get an offer because it was too expensive, it's not, we've seen receivers get handfuls of picks recently all the way back Tyreek Hill, I mean AJ Brown's not in his prime and they got a pretty good haul for him, I mean it wasn't great but it also wasn't nothing, nobody even offered that to the cowboys. Waddle got a nice haul for Miami.

The rules in in place on the tag that you need 2 first round picks to trigger the tag,

but that doesn't mean you can't offer something out in the Cowboys listen he didn't get a single offer of any kind, and that is because of his reputation, whether it's right or wrong or accurate, he's trying to repair his reputation,

so that yes, they would be more comfortable giving him such guaranteed money on long term deal now you're stuck.

And I'm going to refer to just recent history Brandon Ayuk you went through this I hold out God is money got hurt and now he's in a bad place in San Francisco now they gave all this money, and they threw out and ripped off and stuck..

Cowboys are trying to avoid that.. Or the other teams that could be interested they want to see one more year not that he could put up 1200 plus yard and five plus touchdowns, they already know he can do that I want to see him till the company line, be a team player, not creating drama, and that includes during this process,

and so far, so good.

It will be a monumental state to bring a player over like that when you already have see Lamb it's kind of ironic that the Eagles are OK with getting rid of their secret why they under guy that possibly can do the job in Smith I mean Kansas City was OK getting rid of Tyreek Hill they didn't really have anything behind him but it's around here jerry would be stupid to let pick and walk why we still have Lamb,


lamb is still paying very well His earned his contract and he earned his place on this team and he's not leading if it's a choice it'll be pants maybe they'll find a way to keep but I doubt that but the Cowards are going to cut out smell like roses either way they're going to get a lot of pics extra money and they'll get their other receiver in the draft, maybe Flo steps into that roll in 27..
 
Jerry seems to like him, coaches seem to like him very much, players like him very much. He’s doing the smart thing. If he stays healthy, has a good year and continues on his current path he will have a very bright future. So far he is making all of the right moves while avoiding all of the possible dumb moves that he could have chosen. Bravo…
 
Oh no not like the Dallas Cowboys one don't want me to open up my eyes I do watch plenty of ESPN and Good Morning Football along with all the Bleacher Report and the push notifications I get from Twitter yes there are some small stories when a guy misses Not like stories let's just say uh the 2023 training camp where they counted every single mistake that Prescott made every fumble they counted his interception and reported on ESPN everybody was talking about how bad a year he was going to have until they had to shut up because when it happened he played one of his best years it should have been the MVP that is the stories I'm talking about..

Literally right around March when the rumor was that Dallas was gonna tag Pickens there was at least a story every day for about 3 weeks about how they felt George Pickens was gonna hold out and this is going to be a mess if it's going to turn into persons then the store switched around the draft that he was probably gonna get traded he demanded the trade Oh guess what none of that was true but there were stories on it you remember the reporter that backtrack and apologize for making that up because he assumed it was going to happen,,

Then after that none of that happened then the stories were well you're gonna definitely not sign the tag he's gonna do his best to find trade partner before the season starts then he signed the tag everyone was wrong about that then it was uh oh it's not a voluntary workouts and he's gonna do hold in this man is gonna hold in and then hold out and it's gonna be a mess..


That wasn't true None of it was true these are the stories I'm talking about there were at least 15 different narratives being created to try to ruffle feathers and create drama because people seem to feed on this kind of drama and when it doesn't happen they seem very disappointed..

So small stories and mentions are not what I'm talking about they made this into a giant story that never was it was fiction..

Now don't you pay attention the fact I'm telling you they made this into a giant thing because they thought was headed down the road it pars headed down and they were all wrong and it should've never happened...

Would you like me to go screenshot every post about George since March and most of it was all hogwash wrong would you like to show you how bad this was spinning when there was nothing to spin?


I bet you'd be shocked to go back to March and then look at every page and do a search for the stories about George you'd find out it's almost as crazy as about the ones about Prescott and jerry it was coming up hard on catching up them on ridiculousness especially for one guy who constantly posted about George because he was hoping that would happen..

But thanks for telling me I need to open my eye and apparently you just missed all those ridiculous unnecessary posts..
The Dallas Cowboys bring in viewers on TV, and on the field, so by default, any story that involves them gets more airtime than most teams do. When it's a controversial story involving a QB, or a "diva" like Pickens, it draws more attention to things. Listen, I am a Canadian, and nothing was more annoying than you guys beating us at the Olympics and in general, ESPN et al, know next to nothing about the NHL, but........The same is now going on with soccer, and now the fans of the NBA are going bat crap crazy over the Knicks because it's the Knicks. Cowboys fans take things far too personally, but stuff like what you mention comes with the territory
 
Him not being signed long term has NOTHING to do with the cap. It's about guaranteed money. Lamb got 100M, Pickens got 27M. They simply do not want to pay another player that much guaranteed money.

They'll tell you it's hard to pay two players at WR, but again, what's hard about it? If It's not about the cap, what's the problem? They don't want to dish out the money.
Either they are cheap or Jerry is broke lol.

It is that simple.
 
I'm gonna give Schotty credit for having some EQ and treating Pickens like a person and not an inmate in the corrections system. I have forgiven grievous offenses against me because of a sincere conversation and I've gone out of my to get at those who disrespected me in some fashion or another.

Above all else, the Romans valued "dignitas". You offend someone's dignitas...time to cross the Rubicon. I think Schotty's strength - if it is one - is his connection to and understanding of people. Let's hope he's Dick Vermeill and not just a weeping willow.
 
He is getting $27 million
top Federal Tax Bracket is 37% so that is $10 million
No income tax in Texas so he has $17 million
so IF he were to get a 5% return (which is a very low return but lets just use it)
that is $850,000 a year or over $70,000 a MONTH
If you cannot be comfortable on that you are sick
you forgot about the "jock taxes" which is based on what state you play the game in. Away games are taxed based on "that" state taxes.
 
you forgot about the "jock taxes" which is based on what state you play the game in. Away games are taxed based on "that" state taxes.
not all states do this; and just how much of a difference will that make
he can afford a fancy tax lawyer
 
The Dallas Cowboys bring in viewers on TV, and on the field, so by default, any story that involves them gets more airtime than most teams do. When it's a controversial story involving a QB, or a "diva" like Pickens, it draws more attention to things. Listen, I am a Canadian, and nothing was more annoying than you guys beating us at the Olympics and in general, ESPN et al, know next to nothing about the NHL, but........The same is now going on with soccer, and now the fans of the NBA are going bat crap crazy over the Knicks because it's the Knicks. Cowboys fans take things far too personally, but stuff like what you mention comes with the territory
Jeez Dude, I'm fully aware of that!!


that doesn't make it less annoying and less ridiculous by the way our own fan base here did the same thing,

I just national media they've been winning that proverbial shoe to drop maybe we should use the cleat reference and it never happened!!
.
I said it was unnecessary back then and I'm saying it was unnecessary now and I'm right all times but exaggerated like to get ahead of things with the claim and the whining the crying and exaggerations and then they had no reason to...
 
Jeez Dude, I'm fully aware of that!!


that doesn't make it less annoying and less ridiculous by the way our own fan base here did the same thing,

I just national media they've been winning that proverbial shoe to drop maybe we should use the cleat reference and it never happened!!
.
I said it was unnecessary back then and I'm saying it was unnecessary now and I'm right all times but exaggerated like to get ahead of things with the claim and the whining the crying and exaggerations and then they had no reason to...
Keep in mind I am a proud Canuck and my exposure to your national media is limited to what I watch on the fake networks like espn...trust me when I say that living in the Toronto area where our hockey teams is hitting the 60 year mark for their last championship, things are pretty much the same
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,270
Messages
14,526,669
Members
24,208
Latest member
CowboysQC
Back
Top