Final tally for RGIII trade

Manwiththeplan

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,268
Reaction score
7,763
Well then they're idiots. That was a horrific trade.

Due to the QBs drafted after RG3, there really is no way to say the skins won the trade. Russell Wilson and Nick Foles are pro bowl QBs, and there are a handful of pretty good QBs, that went after RG3, that make the bounty they gave up laughable.
 

Manwiththeplan

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,268
Reaction score
7,763
The Commanders won this trade easily IF RG3 proves himself this year. I'm guessing after next season we are going to talk about how Sam Bradford is the next Manning......highly unlikely. Complete wash for the Rams, they will enter next years draft praying that a good franchise QB will be available as they boot Bradford to the curb. I get it though, I mean after 2 years RG3 is a bust and sucks. But Bradford deserves his 4th and he might be the guy......makes sense.

yea, Bradford wasn't part of the trade, and thus shouldn't really factor in.
 

SkinsHokieFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,469
Reaction score
240
So you would be fine with the pick as long as the Rams suck and have to find a QB?

I am fine with the trade as is, even with the 2013 debacle.

In a QB driven NFL you need to have a QB who can play at a high level. When Griffin returns to 2012 passing form (in particular with his accuracy) it'll prove to have been the right move for the Commanders to make.

When you look at the results on the field, it took Griffin exactly 16 games to win a division title (the first for the franchise this century) and get the team back into the playoffs, after the same squad was a combined 11-21 the 2 seasons prior.

The Rams got a bunch of players, 1 RB who is now a special teamer and a 2nd round pick who is now on the Chiefs. Good for them, they needed players also
 

SkinsHokieFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,469
Reaction score
240
Due to the QBs drafted after RG3, there really is no way to say the skins won the trade. Russell Wilson and Nick Foles are pro bowl QBs, and there are a handful of pretty good QBs, that went after RG3, that make the bounty they gave up laughable.

Banking on a 3rd round pick at QB or a 4th round pick at QB is a fool's errand. Wilson of course has an incredible supporting cast and defense, and Foles had one miserable year and one terrific statistical year.

The Commanders were QB choices would have been banking on a mid round pick miracle, or picking up Manuel/Smith in 2013 or again looking for a QB in the 2014 draft, none of whom are the prospect Griffin was in 2012
 

JohnnyHopkins

This is a house of learned doctors
Messages
11,302
Reaction score
3,610
From a completely unbiased perspective the story is still being written. There is also the "no-one won" scenario and the "both teams won" scenario. If RGIII is a Pro-bowler every year but the Commanders are no better than an also-ran then people will say that they did the wrong thing. If the Rams are a powerhouse but can't get over the hump because of their QB then people will say that they should have grabbed RGIII.

The Herschel Walker trade is always thrown around, but it is only done so because those picks helped Dallas build those all-time great Superbowl teams. Few people talk about the Commanders fleecing the Saints with Ricky Williams in this day and age because neither team really had any success afterwards. We need a team to be good enough to tell everyone that they told them so for anyone to really care ten years from now.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
The Commanders won this trade easily IF RG3 proves himself this year. I'm guessing after next season we are going to talk about how Sam Bradford is the next Manning......highly unlikely. Complete wash for the Rams, they will enter next years draft praying that a good franchise QB will be available as they boot Bradford to the curb. I get it though, I mean after 2 years RG3 is a bust and sucks. But Bradford deserves his 4th and he might be the guy......makes sense.

I don't agree with this. Skins only win this if RG3 is a franchise QB and even then, I don't know if you can really say they won. They gave up a lot. I think he really has to win a championship in order to say the Skins definitively won.

At this point, RG3 needs to prove he can be healthy for a lot longer then just 1 season in order to prove he's a success IMO.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
I can't edit the above, but to be clear, I mean by mid season Griffin was playing at a mid tier level, once you could see he was starting to trust his legs. Clearly the first games were not NFL grade qb play.

I don't agree with this. I watched the Skins and I do not believe he was playing at what I would consider to be a mid tier level. Griffin's QB Rating, for the year, was just over 82, which was good for 30th in the league. That's not what I would expect from even a mid tier QB.

If you compare 2013 to 2012 for Griffin, it's not favorable, IMO.

Yard are about the same 3200 (2012) 3203 (2013) but his attempts were way up last year, 456 to 393 and his Comp % was way down, 65.6 (2012) to 60.1 (2013). TD % was down, INT% was up. Was not a good year for RGIII IMO and the comments coming from the Locker Room were not helpful. Guess we'll see what this year brings for RG3.
 

L-O-Jete

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,053
Reaction score
92
I don't think there are many players I would give such a bounty for, much less draft picks (guys who haven't played a single snap of pro ball).
Maybe Peyton and Luck, other than that, no.
 

Manwiththeplan

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,268
Reaction score
7,763
Banking on a 3rd round pick at QB or a 4th round pick at QB is a fool's errand. Wilson of course has an incredible supporting cast and defense, and Foles had one miserable year and one terrific statistical year.

The Commanders were QB choices would have been banking on a mid round pick miracle, or picking up Manuel/Smith in 2013 or again looking for a QB in the 2014 draft, none of whom are the prospect Griffin was in 2012

I wouldn't say drafting Wilson or Fowles would be banking on a 3rd round QB, I'd say it's called being patient.
 

Proximo

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,697
Reaction score
9,117
Banking on a 3rd round pick at QB or a 4th round pick at QB is a fool's errand.

Okay, this statement is wildly flawed. First off, NO team "banks" on a 3rd or 4th round pick (if they were then they wouldn't have waited that long to select them).

There's a reason (probably multiple reasons, actually) why the player was selected so late. No team is "banking" on them. What they're doing is hoping that they can develop them into something worthwhile (which is the case with most mid-to-late round picks). A true "fool's errand" is mortgaging your future on a guy who's not even recognized as the best QB prospect that year while your team is flawed in many other areas.

In all honesty it doesn't matter what the Rams do with all those picks from that trade. Unless RG3-13 gets the Skins a ring it won't be worth it. And right now they're far from being worth it.
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,982
Reaction score
48,729
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I guess they could have kept all those picks plus still had their choice this year if they wanted.
 

LittleBoyBlue

Redvolution
Messages
35,766
Reaction score
8,411
Due to the QBs drafted after RG3, there really is no way to say the skins won the trade. Russell Wilson and Nick Foles are pro bowl QBs, and there are a handful of pretty good QBs, that went after RG3, that make the bounty they gave up laughable.

At this point in his career, 28 games under his belt, he has 5 less wins than Vince young at this point in his career.
 

L-O-Jete

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,053
Reaction score
92
I guess they can use our defense of TehJJ's trade ups: "If they had kept all those picks they probably would have picked trash with them anyway..."
 

SkinsHokieFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,469
Reaction score
240
Okay, this statement is wildly flawed. First off, NO team "banks" on a 3rd or 4th round pick (if they were then they wouldn't have waited that long to select them).

There's a reason (probably multiple reasons, actually) why the player was selected so late. No team is "banking" on them. What they're doing is hoping that they can develop them into something worthwhile (which is the case with most mid-to-late round picks). A true "fool's errand" is mortgaging your future on a guy who's not even recognized as the best QB prospect that year while your team is flawed in many other areas.

In all honesty it doesn't matter what the Rams do with all those picks from that trade. Unless RG3-13 gets the Skins a ring it won't be worth it. And right now they're far from being worth it.

Griffin already has a division title under his belt in year 1, and I expect he will be much of the 2012 version then the 2013 version in 2014.

The opportunity cost for the Rams was to stick with Bradford, or potentially trade him for a 2nd round pick and draft Griffin (Shanahan probably would have given up a 2nd rounder for Bradford in 2012)

The Rams used the picks to get 2 RBs, 1 of whom will be on special teams, 1 DT who looks like he can be a player, a troubled CB who has talent, and a left tackle they plan to move to guard. They have already released a player they drafted.

The Commanders missed out on the chance to draft anyone Janoris Jenkins/Amini Salatu/Cordy Glenn/Jonathon Martin (those were picks 39-43 in the 2012 draft), anyone from picks 22-26 in the 2013 draft (and cost probably isn't the 22nd overall pick in 2013 without the Griffin trade, the Commanders are probably picking in the top 10 again) and a potentially elite player this past season.

My guess is if the Commanders had stayed put they would have selected Tannehill and been 6-10 or 7-9 again in 2012, had another pick around 9-12 in the 2013 draft, and ended up in the same spot again in this past draft.

To judge this trade we will have to see not only how Griffin progresses (and so far he is 1 up on Bradford who never has won a division title) but what the Rams end up doing with Bradford. If in the 3 years of extra picks the Rams end up out of the playoffs each time (they are already 0 for 2 and haven't finished .500) it is going to be a loss to them as they have to figure out how to get a QB in 2015.

Meanwhile the Commanders will be set at QB with a 24 year old that has already produced a division title, and a full slate of picks going forward from 2015 on to continue to build around Griffin. The car note is paid off and the guy just turned 24 in February
 

Rockport

AmberBeer
Messages
46,580
Reaction score
46,004
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I would do that trade 10 out of 10 times.

Because of Bradford, the Rams will probably be in the 6-8 win range again looking for a franchise signal caller next year

Of course you would, your a delusional Skins fan. RGKnee will be done for in another 2 yrs probably.
 

TellerMorrow34

BraveHeartFan
Messages
28,358
Reaction score
5,076
I'm guessing Shanahan (the guy who drafted him) may feel differently.



I'm quite sure he does. I wouldn't blame him at all.

But to be quite honest if he was on board with giving up all those picks to get that guy anyway he deserves to be unemployed.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
Griffin already has a division title under his belt in year 1, and I expect he will be much of the 2012 version then the 2013 version in 2014.

The opportunity cost for the Rams was to stick with Bradford, or potentially trade him for a 2nd round pick and draft Griffin (Shanahan probably would have given up a 2nd rounder for Bradford in 2012)

The Rams used the picks to get 2 RBs, 1 of whom will be on special teams, 1 DT who looks like he can be a player, a troubled CB who has talent, and a left tackle they plan to move to guard. They have already released a player they drafted.

The Commanders missed out on the chance to draft anyone Janoris Jenkins/Amini Salatu/Cordy Glenn/Jonathon Martin (those were picks 39-43 in the 2012 draft), anyone from picks 22-26 in the 2013 draft (and cost probably isn't the 22nd overall pick in 2013 without the Griffin trade, the Commanders are probably picking in the top 10 again) and a potentially elite player this past season.

My guess is if the Commanders had stayed put they would have selected Tannehill and been 6-10 or 7-9 again in 2012, had another pick around 9-12 in the 2013 draft, and ended up in the same spot again in this past draft.

To judge this trade we will have to see not only how Griffin progresses (and so far he is 1 up on Bradford who never has won a division title) but what the Rams end up doing with Bradford. If in the 3 years of extra picks the Rams end up out of the playoffs each time (they are already 0 for 2 and haven't finished .500) it is going to be a loss to them as they have to figure out how to get a QB in 2015.

Meanwhile the Commanders will be set at QB with a 24 year old that has already produced a division title, and a full slate of picks going forward from 2015 on to continue to build around Griffin. The car note is paid off and the guy just turned 24 in February

this is a new low in homerism
 
Top