First Amendment Audits

[Mannix]

Anyone else hooked on these videos? I can't tell you how many hours I've spent over the past year watching these....they are addictive!!!

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

I followed a bunch on YouTube. Still follow, some but removed a good deal as a number of them were just in it to make money. Some would actually call the cops on themselves and some are going to wind up getting shot and or killed due to doing dumb stuff.

With that said there are some out there that truly make a difference soch as Phillip Turner aka the Battousai

 

[Oz-of-Cowboy-Country]

@Reality is my first amendment auditor. He's always telling me I have insufficient privileges to post here.

lol.

 

[JohnnyTheFox]

Most of them are just dummies with a camera.

 

[CashMan]

I followed a bunch on YouTube. Still follow, some but removed a good deal as a number of them were just in it to make money. Some would actually call the cops on themselves and some are going to wind up getting shot and or killed due to doing dumb stuff.

With that said there are some out there that truly make a difference soch as Phillip Turner aka the Battousai

I think those are the Cali ones.

 

[Mannix]

The Cali ones are the best....especially Bay Area Transparency and San Joaquin Valley Transparency....my favorite East Coast are NH Press Now and Long Island Audit.....I have seen Battousai....he is good too.

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

If you have not watched the channel audit the audit you should check it out
He reviews police encounters and gives a grade to each party. Pretty good and pretty fair.

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

Justin Pulliam corruption report is another good one. Especially his work he did in Leon Valley Texas.
Although some will not like his style.

 

[Pass2Run]

Anyone else hooked on these videos? I can't tell you how many hours I've spent over the past year watching these....they are addictive!!!

I used to work for photographyisnotacrime, or PINAC News.. .The guy who started the whole thing, Jeff Gray, worked there with us. Since I started way back in 2013, it evolved and kind of took it's own course. Now, there's a bunch of low-class idiots doing it and I think it kind of gave the whole movement a bad rap.

In any case, interesting to see someone else interested in this stuff.

 

[Pass2Run]

I followed a bunch on YouTube. Still follow, some but removed a good deal as a number of them were just in it to make money. Some would actually call the cops on themselves and some are going to wind up getting shot and or killed due to doing dumb stuff.

With that said there are some out there that truly make a difference soch as Phillip Turner aka the Battousai

Phillip lives in Austin.. Almost every article written on Phillip at PINAC was written by myself.

 

[jnday]

Everyone of these audits seems to be conducted by an idiot with an IQ of 70. They harass law enforcement officers in an effort to make them angry enough to respond and say something that will get the LEO in trouble.

 

[Pass2Run]

Everyone of these audits seems to be conducted by an idiot with an IQ of 70. They harass law enforcement officers in an effort to make them angry enough to respond and say something that will get the LEO in trouble.

Nope, not all of them are stupid. Although there are a lot of idiots out there. If you know Phillip, he's just a quiet guy, hard worker, good person... with a high IQ.

He established precedent, that is now law in Turner v. Driver.

There's also Doc Justice, my most recent partner, who has a PhD in organic chemistry from Miami...That's nothing to shake a stick at. Doc established precedent in the 11th circuit in McDonough v. Randle, which he won at the appelate level, pro se.

Then, Carlos Miller, guy may have had a head injury, but it didn't impact his intelligence.. He also established precedent in his case, pro se and wrote thousands of articles at PINAC.

We established three precedents in three different circuits all within a small group of about 10 people, and 3 activists at PINAC.

There's also Antonio Beuhler.. I started by volunteering with Peaceful Streets Project, before I made a living as a journalist writing about many of these stories, which would go viral. But Beuhler went to West Point, Stanford, Harvard..

Hardly a 70 IQ.

I recently started True Blue News, which just began.. But I signed a contract with the same company that now owns Sports Illustrated, the Street and a few others..

Kind of my side hussle.. But I see it making a bit of money, in a few years.

I'd like to distinguish, though, that I'm not really an auditor, although I got my start filming the police.. I just like to write about these stories, and other police stories, and make them viral on social media. My writer is a younger guy. He was working at McDonalds when I brough him over to PINAC. But he's in college now, and has a high IQ and a lot of bandwith for the topic, so that's why I brought him on.

 

[jnday]

Nope, not all of them are stupid. Although there are a lot of idiots out there. If you know Phillip, he's just a quiet guy, hard worker, good person... with a high IQ.

He established precedent, that is now law in Turner v. Driver.

There's also Doc Justice, my most recent partner, who has a PhD in organic chemistry from Miami...That's nothing to shake a stick at. Doc established precedent in the 11th circuit in McDonough v. Randle, which he won at the appelate level, pro se.

Then, Carlos Miller, guy may have had a head injury, but it didn't impact his intelligence.. He also established precedent in his case, pro se and wrote thousands of articles at PINAC.

We established three precedents in three different circuits all within a small group of about 10 people, and 3 activists at PINAC.

There's also Antonio Beuhler.. I started by volunteering with Peaceful Streets Project, before I made a living as a journalist writing about many of these stories, which would go viral. But Beuhler went to West Point, Stanford, Harvard..

Hardly a 70 IQ.

I recently started True Blue News, which just began.. But I signed a contract with the same company that now owns Sports Illustrated, the Street and a few others..

Kind of my side hussle.. But I see it making a bit of money, in a few years.

I'd like to distinguish, though, that I'm not really an auditor, although I got my start filming the police.. I just like to write about these stories, and other police stories, and make them viral on social media. My writer is a younger guy. He was working at McDonalds when I brough him over to PINAC. But he's in college now, and has a high IQ and a lot of bandwith for the topic, so that's why I brought him on.

From 99% of the audits that I have watched, an idiot walks into a courthouse or other government building and starts insulting the people that works there when they stop him from interrupting people from trying to do their jobs. If the high IQ guys that you mentioned are going in public buildings and being a pain in the *** just to prove that they can do it, then they are making poor use of their intelligence. I have watched several auditors that was filming government buildings just to get a reaction from the employees of those buildings. They are doing exactly what a terrorist would do if they was planning an attack, but these auditors think they are making a big point somehow. They are doing nothing more than bringing suspicion on themselves and causing interruptions for the employees. The point that these auditors don’t understand that just because they have a legal right to do something, it doesn’t mean they should do it. Being rude and antagonizing people that are just trying to do their jobs doesn’t make these auditors some kind of heroes that are fighting for their rights. It just makes them confrontational jerks. Several of these auditors are doing nothing more than trying to get views and they are willing to go to the extremes to do it. These precedents that you mentioned, what did they accomplish that benefits the average, everyday citizen? I might have a different view of these auditors if they done something that actually benefits society.

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

Phillip lives in Austin.. Almost every article written on Phillip at PINAC was written by myself.

I remember a number of individuals using PINAC news as the association when questioned by cops.

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

From 99% of the audits that I have watched, an idiot walks into a courthouse or other government building and starts insulting the people that works there when they stop him from interrupting people from trying to do their jobs. If the high IQ guys that you mentioned are going in public buildings and being a pain in the *** just to prove that they can do it, then they are making poor use of their intelligence. I have watched several auditors that was filming government buildings just to get a reaction from the employees of those buildings. They are doing exactly what a terrorist would do if they was planning an attack, but these auditors think they are making a big point somehow. They are doing nothing more than bringing suspicion on themselves and causing interruptions for the employees. The point that these auditors don’t understand that just because they have a legal right to do something, it doesn’t mean they should do it. Being rude and antagonizing people that are just trying to do their jobs doesn’t make these auditors some kind of heroes that are fighting for their rights. It just makes them confrontational jerks. Several of these auditors are doing nothing more than trying to get views and they are willing to go to the extremes to do it. These precedents that you mentioned, what did they accomplish that benefits the average, everyday citizen? I might have a different view of these auditors if they done something that actually benefits society.

I have seen plenty that just go in and photograph and video people and the surroundings while not saying a word to anyone until they start trying to order them around. There are different types that do this type of things. There are respectful people who just stand up for their rights but are not mean to others. There are some that only get rude when they themselves are treated rude and then there are some that only do it for the clicks, views and youtube money.

There are a good deal out there that are good people who stand up and educate about ALL OF OUR rights. It is sad to see so many people so willing to give
up their basic rights. So many people out there that have no clue of the rights they have. So many people who have fought and died in American history for freedoms and rights for some to just give them away all willy nilly

What is even sadder is the idea that many of these police that are paid to enforce the law and defend our freedoms actually violate our laws and freedoms and in many cases do not even have a basic understanding of the bill of rights. Sadly they don't have a clue even about the very first amendment let alone some of the others such as the 2nd, 4th, 5th

You asked what these auditiors did that he talked about did to protect or benefit society.

In Phillip Turners case he defended his first and fourth amendment rights that we are all guaranteed. If someone has to goto multiple courts to secure the rights of the very first amendment that is a sad state of affairs.

There are plenty, civilians and law enforcement, that really do not understand the first and all it encompasses.

 

[jnday]

I have seen plenty that just go in and photograph and video people and the surroundings while not saying a word to anyone until they start trying to order them around. There are different types that do this type of things. There are respectful people who just stand up for their rights but are not mean to others. There are some that only get rude when they themselves are treated rude and then there are some that only do it for the clicks, views and youtube money.

There are a good deal out there that are good people who stand up and educate about ALL OF OUR rights. It is sad to see so many people so willing to give
up their basic rights. So many people out there that have no clue of the rights they have. So many people who have fought and died in American history for freedoms and rights for some to just give them away all willy nilly

What is even sadder is the idea that many of these police that are paid to enforce the law and defend our freedoms actually violate our laws and freedoms and in many cases do not even have a basic understanding of the bill of rights. Sadly they don't have a clue even about the very first amendment let alone some of the others such as the 2nd, 4th, 5th

You asked what these auditiors did that he talked about did to protect or benefit society.

In Phillip Turners case he defended his first and fourth amendment rights that we are all guaranteed. If someone has to goto multiple courts to secure the rights of the very first amendment that is a sad state of affairs.

There are plenty, civilians and law enforcement, that really do not understand the first and all it encompasses.

I guess my biggest problem is for somebody to go out of the way to bait a law enforcement officer or government employee into violating their rights. I don’t know how you would react, but I would have a problem with somebody wondering through my workplace and filming me without identifying themselves. Considering the events that have happened over the last couple of decades, I see where filming government buildings and employees could be a big safety concern. For that reason, new laws should be put in place that prohibits the filming and disruptions of government buildings and employees. I am as anti-government as anybody that you will ever meet, but I see the potential problems that could come from filming government property and employees. I don’t have a problem with filming officers during traffic stops or road blocks. As I mentioned before, just because we have rights to do certain things doesn’t mean we should do them. I have the right to insult police officers and call them some of the worst names imaginable, but I will never exercise that right because it’s rude and disrespectful. It may be legal, but it’s wrong.

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

I guess my biggest problem is for somebody to go out of the way to bait a law enforcement officer or government employee into violating their rights. I don’t know how you would react, but I would have a problem with somebody wondering through my workplace and filming me without identifying themselves. Considering the events that have happened over the last couple of decades, I see where filming government buildings and employees could be a big safety concern. For that reason, new laws should be put in place that prohibits the filming and disruptions of government buildings and employees. I am as anti-government as anybody that you will ever meet, but I see the potential problems that could come from filming government property and employees. I don’t have a problem with filming officers during traffic stops or road blocks. As I mentioned before, just because we have rights to do certain things doesn’t mean we should do them. I have the right to insult police officers and call them some of the worst names imaginable, but I will never exercise that right because it’s rude and disrespectful. It may be legal, but it’s wrong.

I have no problem if they film. As long as they don't go in making all kinds of noise or demands. Those types I have no patience for. However to go in, film quietly....just let them be. We, as tax payers, pay for those employees and those buildings. Those buildings and employees are also running their own cameras on all people coming in but don't want others filming them. Rules for thee but not for me come to mind. I would also say that if you are there for other business that you should have the right to film your transactions to make sure they are documented for you own records.

Again...I don't like the ones that just act crazy and rude from the word go. I don't mind if they act as others act to them first. But just to go right into it acting a fool, I don't have time for it. That is the reason I have at one time subscribed to a lot of those channels but have since weeded out a good deal of some of the people that really are only in it for the clicks, views and money. Some people that take things too far. Some that have called the cops on themselves to get the reaction in the first place. Those guys do more harm than good when it comes to educating about our rights.

 

[Hardline]

I watch them all the time
They are not doing it in the interests of the first amendment. They are baiting people to cause a reaction for clicks and views
These people are the lowest form of scum there is. .
I call them frauditors.
I do not subscribe to their channels. I watch through channels that expose these frauditors like Villified Freedom. Shrodingers Cat. Degeneration Nation and many others. They also expose sovereign citizens .

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

I watch them all the time
They are not doing it in the interests of the first amendment. They are baiting people to cause a reaction for clicks and views
These people are the lowest form of scum there is. .
I call them frauditors.
I do not subscribe to their channels. I watch through channels that expose these frauditors like Villified Freedom. Shrodingers Cat. Degeneration Nation and many others. They also expose sovereign citizens .

There are plenty of bad apples for sure. Pay Pal patty is one of them.

However there are good ones as well like Phillip Turner.
Audit the Audit who reviews interactions
We the People University who was a former cop and Sheriff
James Madison
Justin Pulliam
The old News Now before he was with Pay Pay Patty and News Now Oklahoma
Jeff Gray

There are plenty of bad ones.
Some that i used to watch but have since then decided I would no longer watch because they were just in it for the views and some were just making things actually worse.
Pay Pal Patty
Furry Potato who has went off the deep end imo
News Now Oklahoma aka Floyd
IDC Chris
A number of them in Cali


I also do not like sovereign citizens and the way some cops act, they tend to be like them as they believe they are above the law in some cases.

 

[Hardline]

There are plenty of bad apples for sure. Pay Pal patty is one of them.

However there are good ones as well like Phillip Turner.
Audit the Audit who reviews interactions
We the People University who was a former cop and Sheriff
James Madison
Justin Pulliam
The old News Now before he was with Pay Pay Patty and News Now Oklahoma
Jeff Gray

There are plenty of bad ones.
Some that i used to watch but have since then decided I would no longer watch because they were just in it for the views and some were just making things actually worse.
Pay Pal Patty
Furry Potato who has went off the deep end imo
News Now Oklahoma aka Floyd
IDC Chris
A number of them in Cali


I also do not like sovereign citizens and the way some cops act, they tend to be like them as they believe they are above the law in some cases.

If a frauditor interacts with a cop he is bad. And you got clowns harassing post office employees. Anyone who makes themselves a part of the story for clicks and views is doing it wrong.
YouTube needs to de-minimize every frauditors channel.