Just because he's the best at a position doesn't mean he should be drafted at 10. Najee Harris is the best RB in the draft and nobody will be taking him at 12. Drafting for a position is called reaching something that will kill your future. Pitts, Sewell, Slater, Horn, Surtain, even Barmore are all way better options. Also we aren't losing games because of our FS. We are losing games because our front 7 gets gashed in the running game!No, I don’t. I don’t see how the best safety in the draft is a reach at 10 just because a few pundits tell us he’ll go later.
Gotta cover all his bases so he can say he was right.According to Fish we covet everyone
You still win games in the trenches.
And Brugler apparently thinks they covet Jevon Holland.
KJ Wright...lolAccording to Fish we covet everyone
Just because he's the best at a position doesn't mean he should be drafted at 10. Najee Harris is the best RB in the draft and nobody will be taking him at 12. Drafting for a position is called reaching something that will kill your future. Pitts, Sewell, Slater, Horn, Surtain, even Barmore are all way better options. Also we aren't losing games because of our FS. We are losing games because our front 7 gets gashed in the running game!
It's irrelevant cause they don't. Fisher even said so about them possibly trading back into the end of round 1. That means they prob got a first round grade on him and he's probably in there 15-25th highest rated player.If the Cowboys have him as the best player available, would you be upset with them taking him just because others don’t have him listed as such?
It's irrelevant cause they don't. Fisher even said so about them possibly trading back into the end of round 1. That means they prob got a first round grade on him and he's probably in there 15-25th highest rated player.
Just because he's the best at a position doesn't mean he should be drafted at 10. Najee Harris is the best RB in the draft and nobody will be taking him at 12. Drafting for a position is called reaching something that will kill your future. Pitts, Sewell, Slater, Horn, Surtain, even Barmore are all way better options. Also we aren't losing games because of our FS. We are losing games because our front 7 gets gashed in the running game!
Chances are, the safeties will be passed over again for a great prospect like T. Hill.how many safties have the Cowboys passed on in the draft the last 10 years that where similar to Moehrig? In other words, dont get your hopes up.
Would most likely trade down and get one and possibly trade back up to get the other if they want both. Would possibly still have a 2nd round pick depending on trade down compensation. You're right neither are worth number 10.Unless they are taking one of those guys at 10, they are going to have to maneuver around to get either. They are not worth 10 but likely won't be there by our 2nd pick.
So... if you had, in a crazy sitch, only had two to choose from at 10:
Barmore, or Moehrig...
Who do you choose?
And you can't get the other via trade, or pick.
It's one, or the other.
I would pick the DT about 95 times out of 100.So... if you had, in a crazy sitch, only had two to choose from at 10:
Barmore, or Moehrig...
Who do you choose?
And you can't get the other via trade, or pick.
It's one, or the other.
What do covet mean
According to Fish we covet everyone
Whatever the right decision is we'll make it.
We cannot keep ignoring the safety position. Doesn’t matter how good the trenches are if your secondary sucks. Ask Philadelphia.
He’ll go in the late first, and Holland might too. GB, KC and NO could all be in play.
I think people are kidding themselves thinking he’s there at 44. Arguably the best safety in the draft won’t last that long.