TwistedL0g1k
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,085
- Reaction score
- 3,162
Can you imagine the pitchforks around here in 5 years!
Will be worse than the hatred for Garrett.
Will be worse than the hatred for Garrett.
Wilson's was four years, $140, $107 guaranteed. Sounds like exactly what Dak is asking for.
Wilson's was four years, $140, $107 guaranteed. Sounds like exactly what Dak is asking for.
Can you imagine the pitchforks around here in 5 years!
Will be worse than the hatred for Garrett.
It's the same money to the player over the same time period. Yes, how the team can manage the cap differs, but that's not the player's fault and it doesn't mean they're asking for more money than Wilson got. Dallas chose not to extend Dak earlier.No, it wasn't. As has been explain on this board, over and over and over and over, Wilson's deal was an extension. So in terms of cap, it wasn't 4 years. But, as I've said in this thread, doesn't matter how much you try and explain this, people don't want to acknowledge that.
Like I've said, I haven't seen CAA ask or settle for anything that doesn't exceed existing. I don't know why anybody would believe they would start now.
PAPPY, pampered? He's played on a 4th rounders salary and earned any bonuses he's received.
Don't want to pay him, as I assumed as I saw that headline, fine but the guy hasn't been pampered. He's playing it tough at the table which is his prerogative.
It's the same money to the player over the same time period. Yes, how the team can manage the cap differs, but that's not the player's fault and it doesn't mean they're asking for more money than Wilson got. Dallas chose not to extend Dak earlier.
It's the same money to the player over the same time period. Yes, how the team can manage the cap differs, but that's not the player's fault and it doesn't mean they're asking for more money than Wilson got. Dallas chose not to extend Dak earlier.
It can certainly be hard to explain things that aren't true.No, it's not. But that's kinda what I mean. It's not the same years, it's not the same money and it's not the teams fault that Dak didn't sign earlier. None of that is true but whatever. To be honest, I'm tired of trying to explain it all.
They signed contracts that put them under team control for 4 extra years in exchange for a certain amount of money above and beyond what they were already contracted to receive. Yes, it's different from the team's cap-management standpoint. No, it's not different for the player: Dak wants a contract that puts him under team control for 4 extra years in exchange for a certain amount of money beyond what he is already contracted to receive (which in Dak's case is $0).It's the same money but it's not the same time period. You are being disingenuous when you say Wilson signed a 4 year deal as if Dak should get a 4 year deal.
Wilson signed a 4 year extension giving him a 5 year deal. Wentz and Goff didn't sign 4 year contracts. They signed 4 year extensions that put them under a 6 year contract.
And we still haven’t won another SB.Lol, no one will care in 5 years when QBs are getting 70 M per
Yeah I don't think he'd see 45 million that 5th year regardless. If he sucks they'd cut him. If he lives up to it they'd re-sign him before it came into play.
Then whatever he’s gonna get is gonna look awful if he doesn’t lolDak will never sniff a SB in his career.