GhostOfPelluer
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,389
- Reaction score
- 5,309
I think you may have grass is greener glasses onJefferson is also 4 years younger.
It's a slam dunk to me.
I think you may have grass is greener glasses onJefferson is also 4 years younger.
It's a slam dunk to me.
I think you may have grass is greener glasses on
True and deservedly so.The one issue here is that Jefferson is likely to get paid more than Church.
It's not hard to fathom, we could use an upgrade in talent at a number of positions, particularly on defense. I'm not as high on Jefferson as some is all. He has improved his pass coverage, I'll grant that, but people act like Church is a bum. He was one of our best defenders last season.Not really.
I know it's hard to fathom that there might be better players out there than what Dallas has.
The one issue here is that Jefferson is likely to get paid more than Church.
Lol I was just gonna say that. Someone will over Pay him significantly. It just all depends on his loyalty.....Lol, welp say goodbye to Church.
Good lord.
Im fine with the safeties. We didn't give up many big plays.
What we need our DBs who can stop all of the short passes and actually allow us to have a chance at getting to the QB.
Quick throw after quick throw after quick throw is why the Packers just torched us.
5-7 a year is the right range.There is a big gap between Berry and the rest of the class. However, even if the league views Church half of what Berry is that is still a boat load at 7 million a year. Church is undervalued by fans, but I can't see signing him for more than 4 to 5 million a year
If you want turnovers in the secondary it helps to have pressure on the QB. A decent QB isn't likely to throw a ball into coverage unless under duressNo big plays but no real turnovers either.
5-7 a year is the right range.
I think Jefferson gets 6-8m.
A deal that might work is 5 years 30m for Church.
8m SB, 1m base 2017 year 1 cap hit of 2.6m.
7m base 2018 --6m will be converted to bonus, year 2 cap hit of 4.25m.
that 16m all guaranteed.
2019 5m
2020 5m
2021 4m
If you want turnovers in the secondary it helps to have pressure on the QB. A decent QB isn't likely to throw a ball into coverage unless under duress
Never expect Church to be a ball hawk, usually the SS isn't a ball hawk. Just speaking to turnovers in the passing game in general. As is, if we had defenders who could catch a football we'd have had at least a half dozen more turnovers in 2016.Church is not a playmaker back there. Thinking a better pass rush turns him into a ball hawk back there would be a stretch.
I am of the mind we need better pass rush and secondary players.