TheRomoSexual
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,057
- Reaction score
- 4,958
I'm hoping for dline. Sans significant trade, there is no olineman we could sign that would make an impact, but we could sign a dlineman who would make an impact on our rotation.
You mean the talent that is now on the street?
Bet we could get a late pick for Costa or Berny as our backups, something we couldn't do with anyone we had at 5th CB.
I'd be stunned if we could get a pick for two stiffs like Costa and Bernadeau.
Yes, I think Sterling Moore was comparable or better than the other 5th CBs in the league. The Cowboys decided it wasn't important. I agree with them. It's not.
I still think Waters is gonna put down the remote control and join us. Then we boot off one of our backup OLers and pick up DL help
I'm with you.
Waters added, the Arkin charade finally ends.
Personally, I'd rather cut Livings or Bernadeau. They have already reached their potential. They are all they are ever gonna be.
I think they are holding that spot until after the first game to add a veteran. No need to add or keep a player you know you'll cut next week. I think Fisher is guessing about OL/DL. I think they are saving the spot for Waters, Moore, or Armstrong. If it is Waters, this is the right way to do it. Sign him, see what he's got, and then if he is washed up, kick him to the curb without having to pay the whole season's salary. But, it is not unusual for me to be mistaken about the Cowboys' plans.
I'd be stunned if we could get a pick for two stiffs like Costa and Bernadeau.
Yes, I think Sterling Moore was comparable or better than the other 5th CBs in the league. The Cowboys decided it wasn't important. I agree with them. It's not.
Why the hate on Arkin? They knew he was a project when they drafted him. If can make as much progress between this year and next as he did last year and this, he will be a good player. Since they have an open spot, they don't need to cut Arkin.
Personally, I'd rather cut Livings or Bernadeau. They have already reached their potential. They are all they are ever gonna be.
Yea I think this may be the case also. I wouldn't be suprised if it happened.I still think Waters is gonna put down the remote control and join us. Then we boot off one of our backup OLers and pick up DL help
Mostly because he simply can't play.
It sounds about right concerning the "two stiffs", they need to get rid of these guys, some of these other cut players will be better options.
Wait, what?
I had to go back and look at the draft board after you said this. Let's ignore the fact that they had a 3rd round grade on a guy who went to the Vikings in Round 7. Why didn't they put in a claim for him?
If that were the case, he would have been cut already. Unless you know something Callahan and Garrett doesn't know.
Sounds dead wrong to me, given that these guys are borderline-starting NFL OLs. We'd obviously get low round picks for them if we were interested in dangling either of them, which we're obviously not.
Moore's a back-roster CB who got caught in a numbers game. He might well be back in week 2, and if he's not, we did sign Pellerin to the practice squad if we're really looking to add another CB at some point.
If that were the case, he would have been cut already. Unless you know something Callahan and Garrett doesn't know.
Sounds dead wrong to me, given that these guys are borderline-starting NFL OLs. We'd obviously get low round picks for them if we were interested in dangling either of them, which we're obviously not.
Moore's a back-roster CB who got caught in a numbers game. He might well be back in week 2, and if he's not, we did sign Pellerin to the practice squad if we're really looking to add another CB at some point.
Look no further than what facts show you.
They will reshuffle this offensive line into any group that allows them to not have to put Arkin on the field.
Actions speak louder than any words.
Jacob Rogers, James Marten, Robert Brewster, David Arkin.
Another miss.
The sooner they admit it, the better off they'll be.