What if he's toxic and is damaging the locker room? Do we really need to ask this and wait for an answer. How about some common sense. If that happens, you do what Seattle and Baltimore did. It's not really that hard to understand. You take a chance on significantly improving your weakest position and if it doesn't work, you get rid of him.
I wouldn't say it’s irrelevant. If he wasn’t supremely talented there wouldn’t even be a discussionStupid article. His talent level is irrelevant to the equation
With the Descaling Knife of zero tolerance.Obviously Earl is better, but does his attitude/diss team meetings and infighting and not adhering to the gameplans overcome that?
What if he's toxic as all Hell to the lockerroom?
How do the scales of justice adjust on this one?
Let's get to the nitty-gritty: does he weigh more than a duck?With the Descaling Knife of zero tolerance.
or
By hanging the Sword of Damocles from the ceiling of the last chance saloon.
More importantly : Is He still an Earl? or is He merely a Baronet?Let's get to the nitty-gritty: does he weigh more than a duck?
Obviously Earl is better, but does his attitude/diss team meetings and infighting and not adhering to the gameplans overcome that?
What if he's toxic as all Hell to the lockerroom?
How do the scales of justice adjust on this one?