For the love of God Romo Throw it away!!

jimnabby;3034819 said:
I think you're thinking about McNabb here.

did you watch the game? he did exactly this and dominated. that's who romo is.
 
Yea, he should just take the sack. He really pissed me off right before the half by not taking the sack. He could have fumbled the ball, or HE COULD MAKE THE PLAY AND THROW A TD PASS! Why is this even a thread? He didn't throw an interception, didn't have a fumble.
 
let romo be romo. He will make you happy and sometimes he'll make you cry, but he lives to give this team its best chance at winning.

Thank god he didnt take that sack btw
 
landryscorner;3031531 said:
That's all I wanted to say. Tired of seeing Romo not make a decision and just stand there and get sacked when nothings open. He needs to either A. Scramble B. Throw it away simple as that if he keeps doing that today then I will continue to lose faith in this quarterback. Great Qb's recognize that a sack means negative yardage for some reason this hasn't sinked into Tony yet...WHy? don't know you tell me....

Someone else responded with a great question to answer your statement. I am merely paraphrasing.


How great will Tony's replacement have to be to meet your standards?

A Peyton Manning Joe Montana Roger Staubach hybrid with NONE of their faults?

C'mon. He's doing very well, and gives Dallas a chance to win EVERY Sunday. That's all we can ask for as fans.
 
dont waste your time, this fairweather fan only talks smack when were down. When were up he doesnt appreciate a good qb.

RIGHT NOW is when you appreciate romo, and remember this feeling when we lose by a point to the giants. appreciate. Hes our best ticket.
 
SharutoX;3034812 said:
OP is *******

Maybe we should lighten up with the name calling. I don't agree with the OP, but do we need to question someone's character because of that?:(
 
ROMO is a competitive player and he wants to win.

I will live and die with ROMO
 
ROUSH8692;3040100 said:
dont waste your time, this fairweather fan only talks smack when were down.


Yup ..... everything he said when we won the game Sunday was tempered with something negative.

I really do not understand how people like that enjoy the game.
 
Maybe we should relish a win where all facets of the game clicked for once. I'm just saying.
 
Joe Rod;3040124 said:
Maybe we should relish a win where all facets of the game clicked for once. I'm just saying.

Post of the Day. Let's enjoy the win.:bow:
 
He pulled it down and ran more than he had in the last 2 years..........that's progress.
 
Throw it away? You can't throw it away while you're in the pocket. You lose even more yards than getting a sack.
 
landryscorner;3031531 said:
That's all I wanted to say. Tired of seeing Romo not make a decision and just stand there and get sacked when nothings open. He needs to either A. Scramble B. Throw it away simple as that if he keeps doing that today then I will continue to lose faith in this quarterback. Great Qb's recognize that a sack means negative yardage for some reason this hasn't sinked into Tony yet...WHy? don't know you tell me....

And sometime you are going to take sacks they all do even the great Payton Manning.
 
DallasEast;3031545 said:
Doesn't intentional grounding result in negative yardage?


Ahh. I read through the thread and wondered why no one brought that up. I assumed most didn't care enough to even mention it in this ridiculous thread lol. But yea i'm pretty sure intentional grounding is called if you throw it away while in the pocket. Its funny. We've been wanting Romo to secure the football when he sacked. Now we want him to "Throw it away" while he's in the pocket lol.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,919
Messages
13,905,400
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top