dcfanatic;2350415 said:If you take away the two plays where the Cardinals defense looked like a high school team, MBIII and Crayton going for a total of 125 yards, then the Cowboys offense put up 249 yards on 58 plays. Plus the offensive line had 60 yards of penalties (witten included on 2 false starts).
So yeah, the special teams stunk it up to the high heavens, but for anyone to even stick up for the O-Line this week is just weak sauce.
And this has nothing to do with Smoaky or Cowboyjoe. It has to do with you trying to act like a football genius over those two.
dcfanatic;2350427 said:Let's not even say it was only the offensive line. The TE's and Deon Anderson stunk as well. Romo was beaten to a pulp by the time he got to OT.
What you forget is that Romo was hit 19 times. Out of our 5 other games, what was the most Romo has been hit?silverbear;2351208 said:Bottom line, if your offense gains 375 yards and averages 5.9 yards per play, against a defense that had been allowing considerably less all year, and you score 24 points that should have been 27, then your offensive line has not had a "bad" game...
It wasn't their best game of the season, it's true, but it certainly wasn't a BAD game...
The other point I was trying to make is that I've seen a lot of "smoaky's" stuff, largely because cowboyjoe is always riding his jock in here, and I am completely unimpressed with his alleged football knowledge...
Now, I like joe most of the time, for the same reason I like CrazyCowboy, he ALWAYS seems to be not just a fan of the Boys, but an ENTHUSIASTIC (some might say insane) fan, and I'll always respect that... but the truth is, he steps on my last nerve with the way he constantly talks as if "smoaky" is the be all and end all of Cowboys analysis... from what I can see, "smoaky" is pretty much a fool...
Coakleys Dad;2350346 said:how bout the giants in two weeeks?
DatNguyen59;2351254 said:What you forget is that Romo was hit 19 times. Out of our 5 other games, what was the most Romo has been hit?
burmafrd;2351263 said:I think the Hotel did a decent job for a one armed guy. Now why they did not even try McQ or Free is something to think about.
silverbear;2351327 said:We both know why they didn't, Burm...
The Boys simply MUST address the offensive line depth next offseason... right now, Montrae Holland is the only backup I have any faith in for the future...
GoinForSix;2350332 said:We also wont play a front 4 as fired up, physical, strong, and fast as the Cards either. That bunch really can get after your QB.
silverbear;2351208 said:Bottom line, if your offense gains 375 yards and averages 5.9 yards per play, against a defense that had been allowing considerably less all year, and you score 24 points that should have been 27, then your offensive line has not had a "bad" game...
It wasn't their best game of the season, it's true, but it certainly wasn't a BAD game...
The other point I was trying to make is that I've seen a lot of "smoaky's" stuff, largely because cowboyjoe is always riding his jock in here, and I am completely unimpressed with his alleged football knowledge...
Now, I like joe most of the time, for the same reason I like CrazyCowboy, he ALWAYS seems to be not just a fan of the Boys, but an ENTHUSIASTIC (some might say insane) fan, and I'll always respect that... but the truth is, he steps on my last nerve with the way he constantly talks as if "smoaky" is the be all and end all of Cowboys analysis... from what I can see, "smoaky" is pretty much a fool...