For Whom the Bells Toll

jday

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
13,284
I love what Jason has done. Remember the days when veterans were given the starting position with huge contracts and their backups were never a threat because they couldn't afford to pay for quality depth?

Now they are all scared and that is a good thing. Fear of being replaced will motivate them to get better and not drop off on their effort. This is how it is supposed to be.

I could not agree with you more. If there is one collective aspect of this team I absolutely love it is their overall youth.

Simultaneous to the era you were referring to were several years in a row where the Cowboys were decimated by injury. Remember trying to sale rival fans on that excuse? The only guys that can't seemingly get out of the ice bath now are mostly holdovers from that era. Imagine that...surely there is not a connection.o_O
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
As albums go, Black may very well be the best album ever made. Just about every song on it was a hit at one point or another. I wasn't as crazy about their Garage Days, but in a era of Hair Bands and men that looked like Tarzan sang like Jane, they were a welcome oasis.

I wouldn't go that far. Black is a fantastic album, but I would put Ride the Lightning and Master of Puppets up against it any day. Every single song on those albums are without question GREAT songs.

I would say Black is better than ...and Justice For All, but that's only because I find the song And Justice For All and Eye of the Beholder decent, but not great songs. Blackened, One, Shortest Straw, Harvester of Sorrow, and Dyers Eve are absolutely EPIC songs.
 

zekecowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,156
Reaction score
2,463
[QUOTE="

Dez Bryant (28). I’ll bet you didn’t see this coming. It’s worth pointing out that the NFL at large says Dez hasn’t earned his contract (and I agree). Granted, injuries have been the big reason fueling this discussion, but as Bill Parcells once said, “Your availability is your best ability.” I recognize that his presence on the field alone helps everyone else. But he is getting paid to be so much more than a guy who demands double-coverage. That quality is hard to quantify, but I am fully aware of how much that helps everything the offense wants to do. Furthermore, it is extremely difficult to be a Super Star on an offense stocked with potential Super Stars.

That said, his days could be numbered dependent on the outcome of this year. Dez must remove all doubt with his play in 2017. Best case scenario, should he fail to play up to his contract this year is the Cowboys will ask him to accept a pay cut…which is not something I see Dez accepting. Worst case scenario, they draft a WR high, of like stature and production, in the 2018 draft. Should the latter come to pass, the trade talks will certainly begin. And given the youth movement this franchise has been married to for the last 5 years, it would not surprise me in the least, to see the Cowboys move on from the X Factor.


This is not hard-hitting analysis. It is simply yet another speculatory-fluff-piece bent on killing time with hopes of generating further conversation to ferry us across another day without football. Nevertheless, for Orlando, Tyrone, Demarcus and Dez it is the story of their life, their dreams, and their ambition to win a Championship with a blue star on their helmet. This upcoming season very well could be their last chance.

Thoughts?[/QUOTE]

http://sturminator.blogspot.com/

Easy to see from the numbers why Dez is on the hot seat for not producing based on his $70 million contract.
 

Verdict

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,230
Reaction score
20,501
If you have been awake for Jason Garrett’s tenure as the Head Coach for the Dallas Cowboys, you might have noticed he doesn’t have the same loyalty issues that plagued Jerry Jones early on in his General Manager role. All Jason wants to know is (1) can the player still play and (2) can the front office make room for him in their salary cap. That’s it. Can he play and can we afford to pay him? Answer those two questions in the affirmative, he’ll give you a look. After that, you either make the team or you don’t. Quick and mostly painless, that.

But if you are a veteran of the Cowboys, and have been for a while, your end as a Cowboy is anything but quick and painless. Anyone reading between the lines of Tony Romo’s heart-wrenching succession speech knows the pain Romo had to press through uttering those fateful words, “Dak has earned the right to be our Quarterback.”

What Romo suffered through was basically a long and drawn out version of what training camp and preseason will be for several veterans currently on the team. Out of 88 players currently waiting for their life-long dream to come true, only 53 will make that dream a reality. Granted, several others may catch on elsewhere, but for now they are dreaming of being a member of the most internationally recognizable sports franchise in the world.

Normally, the veterans have tenure and the salary cap in their corner and don’t have to worry as much as the new guys. But the Cowboys have a long tradition of finding hidden talent and giving guys not formally deemed worthy of an actual draft pick, the opportunity to supplant players that were at one time considered worthy of a draft pick. In Jason Garrett’s eyes, they are all special and therefore none of them are.

On a personal level, I’m sure Garrett’s loyalty knows no bounds. But from a business perspective, he is like a CEO: cold and calculating. You can either do the job you are paid to do and better than the younger alternative, or you cannot. Or you might still be able to the job better but there is a younger player displaying what could be projected as a higher ceiling…Jason will take rookie-mistake lumps over losing to father-time lumps any day of the week. After all, it is ultimately that brand of loyalty that ushered in a losing era of two decades starting in 1996 for the Cowboys and Jason Garrett had front row seats.

The veterans on the hot seat topic is largely old news at this point. However, the question now pulsing in my mind is what would be worse: Being cut from the roster to make room for youth or losing your starting job in favor of youth? The first option would certainly hurt, but at the very least you would be afforded the opportunity to catch on elsewhere with the potential to start. The second option, however, is tantamount to career purgatory…that place in between having a career and not having a career, and the end typically follows quick, fast and in a hurry.

So, speculate all you like who the Cowboys will keep and who they won’t, the following is about those players on the cusp of purgatory…be it too soon or not soon enough.

At this point, the drop off between production would have to be miniscule for the Cowboys to start a rookie over Orlando Scandrick (30). My best guess puts him at Nickel corner with Anthony Brown and Nolan Carroll manning the outside corner spots. I honestly can’t see any of the rookies replacing those top three before the regular season starts. Midseason, however, is a whole nutter thang.

Injuries will likely dictate the depth chart work-arounds, but by midseason 1 of the 3 rookie corners very well could make it hard for the coaches to take them off the field. Considering Scandrick has never (and likely will never) be a ballhawk, it is entirely possible that Scandrick will find the bench by merit of not ever finding the ball, which may end up being the only difference between him and one of his apprentices. On balance, as young as this defense overall is, they very well may live and die on their ability (or lack thereof) to take the ball away. That said, should that happen, I’m sure from Scandrick’s perspective it would be much better to be cut or traded away than ride the pine in favor of a rookie.

I honestly view Demarcus Lawrence (25) and Tyrone Crawford (27) through the same lense. Both, at one time or another, have shouldered larger-than-deserved expectations at some point in their career with Dallas. Fortunately for us fans, we’ve been there and done that already; if we are going to believe they are any more than what they have showed us thus far they will have to prove it with their play in the regular season on a consistent basis. Should someone in training camp suggest the Cowboys may actually get what they’ve paid for from either of the two, I imagine, if eye-rolls made a noise, it would be the eye-roll heard around the world. No one is buying that stock anymore.

While both are still relatively young, the opportunity to start will likely never again be as good as it is this year. Granted, even if they don’t start, they will have their opportunities. But being supplanted by essentially what is two rookies (Tapper and Taco…and, of course, David Irving will certainly be in the conversation) carries with it a stigmatism their careers may never recover from. And the money they will be offered following this contract will likely be 1 year prove it deals with very few occasions offered to actually prove it. If they are here to cash a check and nothing else, more power to them; they are on the right track. But if they ever want to do something substantial with their career, they have to recognize that their chance may never be as good as it is with their present team in this season.

Dez Bryant (28). I’ll bet you didn’t see this coming. It’s worth pointing out that the NFL at large says Dez hasn’t earned his contract (and I agree). Granted, injuries have been the big reason fueling this discussion, but as Bill Parcells once said, “Your availability is your best ability.” I recognize that his presence on the field alone helps everyone else. But he is getting paid to be so much more than a guy who demands double-coverage. That quality is hard to quantify, but I am fully aware of how much that helps everything the offense wants to do. Furthermore, it is extremely difficult to be a Super Star on an offense stocked with potential Super Stars.

That said, his days could be numbered dependent on the outcome of this year. Dez must remove all doubt with his play in 2017. Best case scenario, should he fail to play up to his contract this year is the Cowboys will ask him to accept a pay cut…which is not something I see Dez accepting. Worst case scenario, they draft a WR high, of like stature and production, in the 2018 draft. Should the latter come to pass, the trade talks will certainly begin. And given the youth movement this franchise has been married to for the last 5 years, it would not surprise me in the least, to see the Cowboys move on from the X Factor.

This is not hard-hitting analysis. It is simply yet another speculatory-fluff-piece bent on killing time with hopes of generating further conversation to ferry us across another day without football. Nevertheless, for Orlando, Tyrone, Demarcus and Dez it is the story of their life, their dreams, and their ambition to win a Championship with a blue star on their helmet. This upcoming season very well could be their last chance.

Thoughts?


I think it is a reasonable post. I personally would be shopping Dez if the Cowboys believe we could get it done without him. Jason Witten should be in this discussion as well. If Swaim, Hanna and Rico are healthy I would take my chances with them and send Witten packing if he wouldn't take a significant pay cut. He is a progress stopper at this point in his hall of fame career.
 

IrishAnto

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,068
Reaction score
1,997
If you have been awake for Jason Garrett’s tenure as the Head Coach for the Dallas Cowboys, you might have noticed he doesn’t have the same loyalty issues that plagued Jerry Jones early on in his General Manager role. All Jason wants to know is (1) can the player still play and (2) can the front office make room for him in their salary cap. That’s it. Can he play and can we afford to pay him? Answer those two questions in the affirmative, he’ll give you a look. After that, you either make the team or you don’t. Quick and mostly painless, that.

But if you are a veteran of the Cowboys, and have been for a while, your end as a Cowboy is anything but quick and painless. Anyone reading between the lines of Tony Romo’s heart-wrenching succession speech knows the pain Romo had to press through uttering those fateful words, “Dak has earned the right to be our Quarterback.”

What Romo suffered through was basically a long and drawn out version of what training camp and preseason will be for several veterans currently on the team. Out of 88 players currently waiting for their life-long dream to come true, only 53 will make that dream a reality. Granted, several others may catch on elsewhere, but for now they are dreaming of being a member of the most internationally recognizable sports franchise in the world.

Normally, the veterans have tenure and the salary cap in their corner and don’t have to worry as much as the new guys. But the Cowboys have a long tradition of finding hidden talent and giving guys not formally deemed worthy of an actual draft pick, the opportunity to supplant players that were at one time considered worthy of a draft pick. In Jason Garrett’s eyes, they are all special and therefore none of them are.

On a personal level, I’m sure Garrett’s loyalty knows no bounds. But from a business perspective, he is like a CEO: cold and calculating. You can either do the job you are paid to do and better than the younger alternative, or you cannot. Or you might still be able to the job better but there is a younger player displaying what could be projected as a higher ceiling…Jason will take rookie-mistake lumps over losing to father-time lumps any day of the week. After all, it is ultimately that brand of loyalty that ushered in a losing era of two decades starting in 1996 for the Cowboys and Jason Garrett had front row seats.

The veterans on the hot seat topic is largely old news at this point. However, the question now pulsing in my mind is what would be worse: Being cut from the roster to make room for youth or losing your starting job in favor of youth? The first option would certainly hurt, but at the very least you would be afforded the opportunity to catch on elsewhere with the potential to start. The second option, however, is tantamount to career purgatory…that place in between having a career and not having a career, and the end typically follows quick, fast and in a hurry.

So, speculate all you like who the Cowboys will keep and who they won’t, the following is about those players on the cusp of purgatory…be it too soon or not soon enough.

At this point, the drop off between production would have to be miniscule for the Cowboys to start a rookie over Orlando Scandrick (30). My best guess puts him at Nickel corner with Anthony Brown and Nolan Carroll manning the outside corner spots. I honestly can’t see any of the rookies replacing those top three before the regular season starts. Midseason, however, is a whole nutter thang.

Injuries will likely dictate the depth chart work-arounds, but by midseason 1 of the 3 rookie corners very well could make it hard for the coaches to take them off the field. Considering Scandrick has never (and likely will never) be a ballhawk, it is entirely possible that Scandrick will find the bench by merit of not ever finding the ball, which may end up being the only difference between him and one of his apprentices. On balance, as young as this defense overall is, they very well may live and die on their ability (or lack thereof) to take the ball away. That said, should that happen, I’m sure from Scandrick’s perspective it would be much better to be cut or traded away than ride the pine in favor of a rookie.

I honestly view Demarcus Lawrence (25) and Tyrone Crawford (27) through the same lense. Both, at one time or another, have shouldered larger-than-deserved expectations at some point in their career with Dallas. Fortunately for us fans, we’ve been there and done that already; if we are going to believe they are any more than what they have showed us thus far they will have to prove it with their play in the regular season on a consistent basis. Should someone in training camp suggest the Cowboys may actually get what they’ve paid for from either of the two, I imagine, if eye-rolls made a noise, it would be the eye-roll heard around the world. No one is buying that stock anymore.

While both are still relatively young, the opportunity to start will likely never again be as good as it is this year. Granted, even if they don’t start, they will have their opportunities. But being supplanted by essentially what is two rookies (Tapper and Taco…and, of course, David Irving will certainly be in the conversation) carries with it a stigmatism their careers may never recover from. And the money they will be offered following this contract will likely be 1 year prove it deals with very few occasions offered to actually prove it. If they are here to cash a check and nothing else, more power to them; they are on the right track. But if they ever want to do something substantial with their career, they have to recognize that their chance may never be as good as it is with their present team in this season.

Dez Bryant (28). I’ll bet you didn’t see this coming. It’s worth pointing out that the NFL at large says Dez hasn’t earned his contract (and I agree). Granted, injuries have been the big reason fueling this discussion, but as Bill Parcells once said, “Your availability is your best ability.” I recognize that his presence on the field alone helps everyone else. But he is getting paid to be so much more than a guy who demands double-coverage. That quality is hard to quantify, but I am fully aware of how much that helps everything the offense wants to do. Furthermore, it is extremely difficult to be a Super Star on an offense stocked with potential Super Stars.

That said, his days could be numbered dependent on the outcome of this year. Dez must remove all doubt with his play in 2017. Best case scenario, should he fail to play up to his contract this year is the Cowboys will ask him to accept a pay cut…which is not something I see Dez accepting. Worst case scenario, they draft a WR high, of like stature and production, in the 2018 draft. Should the latter come to pass, the trade talks will certainly begin. And given the youth movement this franchise has been married to for the last 5 years, it would not surprise me in the least, to see the Cowboys move on from the X Factor.

This is not hard-hitting analysis. It is simply yet another speculatory-fluff-piece bent on killing time with hopes of generating further conversation to ferry us across another day without football. Nevertheless, for Orlando, Tyrone, Demarcus and Dez it is the story of their life, their dreams, and their ambition to win a Championship with a blue star on their helmet. This upcoming season very well could be their last chance.

Thoughts?


As usual JDay appreciate the effort.

Just one point regarding Scandrick getting his marching papers for not producing enough (any) turnovers.

That could happen, however considering that pretty much nobody on the defense (especially in the secondary) has produced many turnovers for quite a number of years and I don’t expect that to change anytime soon especially with rookies so I can’t see him being cut for that reason.

I’d like to be proven wrong (about us generating turnovers that is) but with all matters Cowboy related I say “Show Me” first.
 

Hawkeye19

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,645
Reaction score
22,720
Good post... however, I think you are giving Garrett a lot of credit for shaping the roster when I think it is more likely the result of a philosophy shift by Stephen Jones and a great job by McClay and the scouting department.

Stephen has gone on record saying that they aren't going to pay "good" players like "great" players in free agency and that they are focused on building through the draft and that has certainly played out the last few years... even to the point where they lay low in FA in order to maximize their compensatory picks.

All of that to say that vets that are no longer producing will not be extended. I fully expect the rookies to get every opportunity to compete and if they show well-- to start and unseat less productive vets.
 

jday

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
13,284
[QUOTE="

Dez Bryant (28). I’ll bet you didn’t see this coming. It’s worth pointing out that the NFL at large says Dez hasn’t earned his contract (and I agree). Granted, injuries have been the big reason fueling this discussion, but as Bill Parcells once said, “Your availability is your best ability.” I recognize that his presence on the field alone helps everyone else. But he is getting paid to be so much more than a guy who demands double-coverage. That quality is hard to quantify, but I am fully aware of how much that helps everything the offense wants to do. Furthermore, it is extremely difficult to be a Super Star on an offense stocked with potential Super Stars.

That said, his days could be numbered dependent on the outcome of this year. Dez must remove all doubt with his play in 2017. Best case scenario, should he fail to play up to his contract this year is the Cowboys will ask him to accept a pay cut…which is not something I see Dez accepting. Worst case scenario, they draft a WR high, of like stature and production, in the 2018 draft. Should the latter come to pass, the trade talks will certainly begin. And given the youth movement this franchise has been married to for the last 5 years, it would not surprise me in the least, to see the Cowboys move on from the X Factor.


This is not hard-hitting analysis. It is simply yet another speculatory-fluff-piece bent on killing time with hopes of generating further conversation to ferry us across another day without football. Nevertheless, for Orlando, Tyrone, Demarcus and Dez it is the story of their life, their dreams, and their ambition to win a Championship with a blue star on their helmet. This upcoming season very well could be their last chance.

Thoughts?

http://sturminator.blogspot.com/

Easy to see from the numbers why Dez is on the hot seat for not producing based on his $70 million contract.
I saw the info provided in the link somewhere else. One thing we do have to take in consideration is that Dez is surrounded by talented skill players. So while I do expect him to be better than what he was, I wouldn't necessarily say he is in direct competition with the other receivers on that list because they don't have the same compliment of talent surrounding them.
 

jday

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
13,284
I think it is a reasonable post. I personally would be shopping Dez if the Cowboys believe we could get it done without him. Jason Witten should be in this discussion as well. If Swaim, Hanna and Rico are healthy I would take my chances with them and send Witten packing if he wouldn't take a significant pay cut. He is a progress stopper at this point in his hall of fame career.
Dez has this year to prove one way or another that he is worth the cap hit. Personally, I think he will answer that call. He's that type of player. When he has doubters he plays his best football. Hopefully, he feels doubted for the entire season and beyond. I was calling for Jason Witten to be traded about 5 years ago. Now, he simply isn't worth to other teams what he is worth to the Cowboys. His best asset is how he approaches and prepares for the game. That preparation may not put him on par with other top tier tight ends in the league, but he is a great example to have on the team for young players. Besides, I suspect he will likely retire after this year.
 

jday

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
13,284
As usual JDay appreciate the effort.

Just one point regarding Scandrick getting his marching papers for not producing enough (any) turnovers.

That could happen, however considering that pretty much nobody on the defense (especially in the secondary) has produced many turnovers for quite a number of years and I don’t expect that to change anytime soon especially with rookies so I can’t see him being cut for that reason.

I’d like to be proven wrong (about us generating turnovers that is) but with all matters Cowboy related I say “Show Me” first.
I'd say the massive turnover in the secondary is a result of the lack of turnovers on the field. Granted, the rookies (excluding Xavier Woods) may not ever be considered ballhawks in the same sense that Ed Reed was a ballhawk, but I do like our chances better with this group of corners versus last years corners. The point I was making is not so much that he will be benched because he's not a ballhawk, but because the only difference between him and Jourdan Lewis is that Lewis has shown a knack for finding the ball. Granted, we will have to see it in the pros, but from the coaches perspective if he has two guys that are similar in skillset but only one has ballhawk-like ability, you are more than likely going to put that guy on the field in favor of the guy who doesn't. But again, I do not believe that's what the opening day depth chart will look like. I''m predicting a change at some point in the season....though, I certainly could be wrong.
 

jday

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
13,284
Good post... however, I think you are giving Garrett a lot of credit for shaping the roster when I think it is more likely the result of a philosophy shift by Stephen Jones and a great job by McClay and the scouting department.

Stephen has gone on record saying that they aren't going to pay "good" players like "great" players in free agency and that they are focused on building through the draft and that has certainly played out the last few years... even to the point where they lay low in FA in order to maximize their compensatory picks.

All of that to say that vets that are no longer producing will not be extended. I fully expect the rookies to get every opportunity to compete and if they show well-- to start and unseat less productive vets.
I think that philosophy shift was a front office team effort that Jason Garrett was very much a big part of implementing. Sure, you could give credit to McClay, Stephen, even Jerry Jones to an extent. But the culture of this team is very much Garrett's brain-child. Furthermore, this was not a pat Jason Garrett on the back thread...this is simply about those veteran players whom I believe will make the final 53 this year but whose careers are in jeopardy if they don't produce this season.
 

IrishAnto

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,068
Reaction score
1,997
I'd say the massive turnover in the secondary is a result of the lack of turnovers on the field. Granted, the rookies (excluding Xavier Woods) may not ever be considered ballhawks in the same sense that Ed Reed was a ballhawk, but I do like our chances better with this group of corners versus last years corners. The point I was making is not so much that he will be benched because he's not a ballhawk, but because the only difference between him and Jourdan Lewis is that Lewis has shown a knack for finding the ball. Granted, we will have to see it in the pros, but from the coaches perspective if he has two guys that are similar in skillset but only one has ballhawk-like ability, you are more than likely going to put that guy on the field in favor of the guy who doesn't. But again, I do not believe that's what the opening day depth chart will look like. I''m predicting a change at some point in the season....though, I certainly could be wrong.

Agreed, however my point was that Dallas is where playmakers come to die (from a playmaking point of view that is).

Now I know he was injured for a good deal of his career in Dallas but Mo Claiborne had 11 interceptions in his final two years at LSU but only 4 in 5 years with us.

And let's face it he's not alone.

Our pace setter these last two years is an undrafted free agent from a small school with the underwhelming number of two for each year (and I'm not trying to knock him here).

And again this has been the norm for many years now.

So the chances of any of our rookies pushing an established veteran off the team with the number of turnovers he's generating is sadly an unlikely occurrence.

Still we can live in hope :)
 

dallasdave

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,326
Reaction score
88,063
If you have been awake for Jason Garrett’s tenure as the Head Coach for the Dallas Cowboys, you might have noticed he doesn’t have the same loyalty issues that plagued Jerry Jones early on in his General Manager role. All Jason wants to know is (1) can the player still play and (2) can the front office make room for him in their salary cap. That’s it. Can he play and can we afford to pay him? Answer those two questions in the affirmative, he’ll give you a look. After that, you either make the team or you don’t. Quick and mostly painless, that.

But if you are a veteran of the Cowboys, and have been for a while, your end as a Cowboy is anything but quick and painless. Anyone reading between the lines of Tony Romo’s heart-wrenching succession speech knows the pain Romo had to press through uttering those fateful words, “Dak has earned the right to be our Quarterback.”

What Romo suffered through was basically a long and drawn out version of what training camp and preseason will be for several veterans currently on the team. Out of 88 players currently waiting for their life-long dream to come true, only 53 will make that dream a reality. Granted, several others may catch on elsewhere, but for now they are dreaming of being a member of the most internationally recognizable sports franchise in the world.

Normally, the veterans have tenure and the salary cap in their corner and don’t have to worry as much as the new guys. But the Cowboys have a long tradition of finding hidden talent and giving guys not formally deemed worthy of an actual draft pick, the opportunity to supplant players that were at one time considered worthy of a draft pick. In Jason Garrett’s eyes, they are all special and therefore none of them are.

On a personal level, I’m sure Garrett’s loyalty knows no bounds. But from a business perspective, he is like a CEO: cold and calculating. You can either do the job you are paid to do and better than the younger alternative, or you cannot. Or you might still be able to the job better but there is a younger player displaying what could be projected as a higher ceiling…Jason will take rookie-mistake lumps over losing to father-time lumps any day of the week. After all, it is ultimately that brand of loyalty that ushered in a losing era of two decades starting in 1996 for the Cowboys and Jason Garrett had front row seats.

The veterans on the hot seat topic is largely old news at this point. However, the question now pulsing in my mind is what would be worse: Being cut from the roster to make room for youth or losing your starting job in favor of youth? The first option would certainly hurt, but at the very least you would be afforded the opportunity to catch on elsewhere with the potential to start. The second option, however, is tantamount to career purgatory…that place in between having a career and not having a career, and the end typically follows quick, fast and in a hurry.

So, speculate all you like who the Cowboys will keep and who they won’t, the following is about those players on the cusp of purgatory…be it too soon or not soon enough.

At this point, the drop off between production would have to be miniscule for the Cowboys to start a rookie over Orlando Scandrick (30). My best guess puts him at Nickel corner with Anthony Brown and Nolan Carroll manning the outside corner spots. I honestly can’t see any of the rookies replacing those top three before the regular season starts. Midseason, however, is a whole nutter thang.

Injuries will likely dictate the depth chart work-arounds, but by midseason 1 of the 3 rookie corners very well could make it hard for the coaches to take them off the field. Considering Scandrick has never (and likely will never) be a ballhawk, it is entirely possible that Scandrick will find the bench by merit of not ever finding the ball, which may end up being the only difference between him and one of his apprentices. On balance, as young as this defense overall is, they very well may live and die on their ability (or lack thereof) to take the ball away. That said, should that happen, I’m sure from Scandrick’s perspective it would be much better to be cut or traded away than ride the pine in favor of a rookie.

I honestly view Demarcus Lawrence (25) and Tyrone Crawford (27) through the same lense. Both, at one time or another, have shouldered larger-than-deserved expectations at some point in their career with Dallas. Fortunately for us fans, we’ve been there and done that already; if we are going to believe they are any more than what they have showed us thus far they will have to prove it with their play in the regular season on a consistent basis. Should someone in training camp suggest the Cowboys may actually get what they’ve paid for from either of the two, I imagine, if eye-rolls made a noise, it would be the eye-roll heard around the world. No one is buying that stock anymore.

While both are still relatively young, the opportunity to start will likely never again be as good as it is this year. Granted, even if they don’t start, they will have their opportunities. But being supplanted by essentially what is two rookies (Tapper and Taco…and, of course, David Irving will certainly be in the conversation) carries with it a stigmatism their careers may never recover from. And the money they will be offered following this contract will likely be 1 year prove it deals with very few occasions offered to actually prove it. If they are here to cash a check and nothing else, more power to them; they are on the right track. But if they ever want to do something substantial with their career, they have to recognize that their chance may never be as good as it is with their present team in this season.

Dez Bryant (28). I’ll bet you didn’t see this coming. It’s worth pointing out that the NFL at large says Dez hasn’t earned his contract (and I agree). Granted, injuries have been the big reason fueling this discussion, but as Bill Parcells once said, “Your availability is your best ability.” I recognize that his presence on the field alone helps everyone else. But he is getting paid to be so much more than a guy who demands double-coverage. That quality is hard to quantify, but I am fully aware of how much that helps everything the offense wants to do. Furthermore, it is extremely difficult to be a Super Star on an offense stocked with potential Super Stars.

That said, his days could be numbered dependent on the outcome of this year. Dez must remove all doubt with his play in 2017. Best case scenario, should he fail to play up to his contract this year is the Cowboys will ask him to accept a pay cut…which is not something I see Dez accepting. Worst case scenario, they draft a WR high, of like stature and production, in the 2018 draft. Should the latter come to pass, the trade talks will certainly begin. And given the youth movement this franchise has been married to for the last 5 years, it would not surprise me in the least, to see the Cowboys move on from the X Factor.

This is not hard-hitting analysis. It is simply yet another speculatory-fluff-piece bent on killing time with hopes of generating further conversation to ferry us across another day without football. Nevertheless, for Orlando, Tyrone, Demarcus and Dez it is the story of their life, their dreams, and their ambition to win a Championship with a blue star on their helmet. This upcoming season very well could be their last chance.

Thoughts?
For Whom the Bells Toll--Did you write that book ???????????
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I think that philosophy shift was a front office team effort that Jason Garrett was very much a big part of implementing. Sure, you could give credit to McClay, Stephen, even Jerry Jones to an extent. But the culture of this team is very much Garrett's brain-child. Furthermore, this was not a pat Jason Garrett on the back thread...this is simply about those veteran players whom I believe will make the final 53 this year but whose careers are in jeopardy if they don't produce this season.

And you would be right. One, a lot was made about the changes Garrett implemented to how the coaching staff and scouting department interact when he first got here. Given his dad's involvement with scouting for so many years. Two, McClay had been with the team since 2002, but he was only elevated from Director of Football Research in 2014. I know we like to pretend that stuff all happens in a vacuum and without the HC's input in the Garrett regime, but you just have to look at when the drafts started improving to realize what's really going on and why it's important.
 

RoboQB

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,479
Reaction score
10,756
If the Black album was a dart board of every song therein, you would be hard pressed to miss a good song.

Ah, I love the cross promotion here in CZ. It jars memories from days past.

As a rebellious teenager in 1985, I found my way to a concert with Metallica opening for Ozzy at the old
Capital Center. The house was FULL for the opening act. The guys, dressed in black, blasted out songs from
their new Master of Puppets album as well as favorites from Ride the Lightning and Kill'em All.
Just four young dudes with a sheet backdrop of their new album cover behind them.
They rocked the house!

Just a tidbit for my fellow rockin' Cowboys fans. The guitar solo on Creeping Death was voted as
the best metal solo of all time. Turn it up to 11.
 

jday

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
13,284
Agreed, however my point was that Dallas is where playmakers come to die (from a playmaking point of view that is).

Now I know he was injured for a good deal of his career in Dallas but Mo Claiborne had 11 interceptions in his final two years at LSU but only 4 in 5 years with us.

And let's face it he's not alone.

Our pace setter these last two years is an undrafted free agent from a small school with the underwhelming number of two for each year (and I'm not trying to knock him here).

And again this has been the norm for many years now.

So the chances of any of our rookies pushing an established veteran off the team with the number of turnovers he's generating is sadly an unlikely occurrence.

Still we can live in hope :)
I think we both can agree the lack of turnovers is not due to the uniform. The issue, in my opinion, has been schematic. Marinelli prefers zone coverage looks as opposed to man, for this reason. However, because both Carr and Claiborne's strengths were as man corners, he tweaked his defense to accommodate them. It seems to me that this offseason they placed more of an emphasis on finding DB's that excelled in zone coverage. With the addition of more zone coverage back in Marinelli system, I suspect we will see much more interceptions.

Of course, it may not be an immediate change that is apparent to everyone from game one of the regular season. But by mid-season, I am predicting vast improvements in every area of the defense including, of course, turnovers. I could be wrong. I hope I'm not. Because the Cowboys season overall likely depends on it.
 
Top