blueblood70
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 53,986
- Reaction score
- 34,475
It's not the bottom line,Couldn’t read all of this but bottom line, not going to pay 2 WR. Thanks
they will pay 2 wide receivers, they're paying about 6 of them, See where your point just gets way off track?
I don't care that you didn't read it all, You want me to make it more readable, you want me to compress it with AI, just so it's more to your reading capabilities?
What they can't do and what they're not going to do is pay two wide receivers top 5 market money at the same time that is the reason he's not signed yet.
It's not about paying him a fair price he's going to want maximum money; he wants big time WR1 money.
I don't care that you didn't read it all your statement was untrue it lacked facts I gave you the facts that says it's not the same as Chase Vs T Higgins,
T higgins deal is nowhere near with a top market wide receiver one is making. Again, that's my point if George would take something like that where he's making less than CD lamb he would already be signed I hope this is short enough for you because if you want me to compress it more you really shouldn't be having discussions in a form like this twitter would be your style..

