- Messages
- 78,804
- Reaction score
- 43,783
Man, 11m$ for all these TE’s is a hard bargain for me. So much money for above average players at a least important position.
As the saying goes, that’s the price of poker these days. A new reality.Man, 11m$ for all these TE’s is a hard bargain for me. So much money for above average players at a least important position.
Why is Adams more than Godwin?
It’s not really about the money. It’s about extending the time to be able to work out a longer term deal.Tagging a TE seems silly to me. Unless they're generational, it's like tagging a back up WR.
The problem with this thought process is that yards are great, but a TE isn't just a receiver. Again with the fantasy points. Teams need a guy who is a strong blocker. Which he's just not.~80 receptions and ~800 yards for Schultz is hardly “average” for a tightend. If you don’t value the position, that’s you’re on prerogative, but he’s probably a top 5-7 guys right now. Which is right where he’s being paid. If they extend him during the season they drop that cost and he’s a hell of a deal.
~80 receptions and ~800 yards for Schultz is hardly “average” for a tightend. If you don’t value the position, that’s you’re on prerogative, but he’s probably a top 5-7 guys right now. Which is right where he’s being paid. If they extend him during the season they drop that cost and he’s a hell of a deal.
He's not that good. Offer an extension or don't. The problem with this front office it this is how they think - "It's not about the money."It’s not really about the money. It’s about extending the time to be able to work out a longer term deal.
The problem with this thought process is that yards are great, but a TE isn't just a receiver. Again with the fantasy points. Teams need a guy who is a strong blocker. Which he's just not.
If it were me I'd pay my back seven on defense, the offensive line, a QB, and one WR. That's seven on defense and seven on offense. The rest of the guys can be role players. But that's just me.Man, 11m$ for all these TE’s is a hard bargain for me. So much money for above average players at the least important position.
Hey, I did say above average. You think he’s top 5-7?
agreed top 3 TE stats , top 7 money daks qbr with him as target is tops in the leagueTeams with good coaches put TEs like Schultz in position to chip and make plays from the LOS off the line.
Do they need him to be a better blocker? Absolutely.
Do they also need him for those tough yards and big third down grabs? Absolutely.
It’s not like he’s even getting top-3 money. He’s getting top-7 money. It’s chump change for a starter, really.
Its the egregious overpaying to other guys that is the issue.
If it were me I'd pay my back seven on defense, the offensive line, a QB, and one WR. That's seven on defense and seven on offense. The rest of the guys can be role players. But that's just me.
stats say 3rd stats don't lie we had a lot of alternate targets and he still performed well.I think he’s easily at least the 7th best receiving TE in the league.
Teams with good coaches put TEs like Schultz in position to chip and make plays from the LOS off the line.
Do they need him to be a better blocker? Absolutely.
Do they also need him for those tough yards and big third down grabs? Absolutely.
It’s not like he’s even getting top-3 money. He’s getting top-7 money. It’s chump change for a starter, really.
Its the egregious overpaying to other guys that is the issue.
The problem with this thought process is that yards are great, but a TE isn't just a receiver. Again with the fantasy points. Teams need a guy who is a strong blocker. Which he's just not.