YosemiteSam
Unfriendly and Aloof!
- Messages
- 45,858
- Reaction score
- 22,194
Hostile;4246989 said:I'm sorry, but that is impressive at any level.
I love how people act like this game is so freaking easy.
For some of us it is.
Hostile;4246989 said:I'm sorry, but that is impressive at any level.
I love how people act like this game is so freaking easy.
Point out your records brah, I want to worship.Sam I Am;4247311 said:For some of us it is.
Sam I Am;4243620 said:I salute talent, but doing at the high school (or college) level isn't all that impressive. (only 2.4% of college players become pros) When you break records pro level. THEN I accept it as greatness.
Give Barry Sanders, Emmitt Smith, Eric Dickerson, or whomever else enough chances or a shot at enough TERRIBLE teams, they would shatter numerous records.
We are talking high school. Might as well be fleas playing defense.
Cythim;4247173 said:It is a game, and games in general are pretty freaking easy. It may take a lot of talent and hard work to be great at, but it is still just a game.
Sam I Am;4243620 said:I salute talent, but doing at the high school (or college) level isn't all that impressive. (only 2.4% of college players become pros) When you break records pro level. THEN I accept it as greatness.
Give Barry Sanders, Emmitt Smith, Eric Dickerson, or whomever else enough chances or a shot at enough TERRIBLE teams, they would shatter numerous records.
We are talking high school. Might as well be fleas playing defense.
The point is, they did it in the NFL. The NFL is the elite talent in all of football. Running wild against high school players isn't impressive.joseephuss;4247445 said:I don't understand your point. Sanders, Smith and Dickerson all played high school football and had enough shots at terrible teams.
Stautner;4247465 said:Come on, of course it's impressive. What you are talking about is whether a high school accomplishment guarantess greatness in the future
Sam I Am;4247517 said:The point is, they did it in the NFL. The NFL is the elite talent in all of football. Running wild against high school players isn't impressive.
Look at the Longhorns. They rushed for 400+ yards what two weeks ago, yet they are still a second rate team. The best team in college (LSU, Alabama, whoever) would get slaughtered by the worse NFL team.
Running against a team stacked with no talent just isn't impressive to me. That is the point.
How many times have we seen RBs put up HUGE numbers in college only to become busts in the NFL.
The reason is the level of talent they are playing again goes way way up. They weren't that good, they were just better than the talentless defenders they were playing against.
Stautner;4247528 said:You think all of those 8,795 yards and 141 TD's were against teams with no talent on defense? Do you think none of the great NFL rushing leaders ever played against the lower level defenses?
Come on, you have to be able to separate points in time. 8,795 yards is damn impressive in high school, and particularly in Florida where high school football is huge. Nobody is saying you have to consider him in the same league as Emmitt or think of him as a sure fire NFL star. That's not the context in which his records were accomplished, nor the context in which his records should be judged, yet you are trying to put him in that context. Within the context of high school football in one of the most competitive states for high school football, what he accomplished is damn impressive.
If it's such an unimpressive record why did it take 25 years for someone to break it?
Sam I Am;4247540 said:lol. I didn't say he didn't have talent, I said I'm not impressed by doing it against talentless defenses. Jeez dude.
Stautner;4247546 said:And, again, you are telling me that 8,975 yards and 141 TD's was built solely on playing against bottom barrel defenses? What do you base that thought on?
Lots of kids are talented, not many break 25 year old records, and I'm not the one who dismissed those accomplisments as being unimpressive.Sam I Am;4247565 said:Do you always dismiss everything and take account of a single detail then base your argument on that single detail?
[URL="http://images.fineartamerica.com/images-medium/tunnel-vision-sandra-winiasz.jpg"][URL="http://images.fineartamerica.com/images-medium/tunnel-vision-sandra-winiasz.jpg"][URL="http://images.fineartamerica.com/images-medium/tunnel-vision-sandra-winiasz.jpg"] [/URL][/URL][/URL]
I said the kid is talented. :bang2:
Stautner;4247618 said:Seems to me you are saying no accomplishment is "impressive" unless it is attained while at the highest possible level against the highest possible level of competition.
Sam I Am;4247637 said:Okay. That is what I'm saying...
ZeroClub;4244616 said:Alabama, Florida, Florida State, Miami, etc.
Sam I Am;4247521 said:That has nothing to do with what I said. All I said is running for lots of yards at the high school level does not impress me.
high school and college are nothing but developmental leagues. Most of the players aren't developed at all. 2.3% of college players make it in the pros. What does that say for high school kids?
Exactly. That is why I'm not impressed. I played TE in college. I had several 100 yard receiving days and we were a run first school. I was no great TE. The defense just sucked that much.