I know man....and you know I'm not satisfied with Dak's play but posters on this site make it hard to say anything about him when you have guys with a clear motive doing the critiquing....
You can't provide a link because its a myth. The team can't stop the run. I don't care if they don't like each other. I don't care about any of that crap. Stop the run and we don't have this talk. Because right now you could have Pat Mahomes at QB and if you can't stop the run its for nothing. anything els is just a excuse this point.
No question about it
However, some of the horses got out before they closed the barn door.
During the game, on the sidelines after 1st pik....footage of CD & Dak riding Schultz rear end for not crossing face of the safety
Maybe he did it for so long they decided, "Well, might as well head to the open field!"
Kurt Warner was mostly correct, but he was wrong discussing both Interceptions. Packers used a triangle mid coverage (2 LBs riding the seems and a hovering/rover mid-Safety). The way to beat that is simple. CeeDee needs to recognize the sneaky formation (as does Dak). Instead of running a drag or a post, CeeDee needs to cut that route short and cut inside the LB and run a slant. He would have been wide open in between both LBs and way in front of the mid-Safety. Quick slant route adjustment would have dissected that tricky triangle mid coverage. Dak, CeeDee, Kellen Moore and the receivers, TEs and positional coaches need to study film and make easy but slight route adjustments and just practice the crap out of those adjustments.The reason why I trust Kurt Warner more than all these guys (including Irvin) is that he seems to do analyzing plays just for fun and to the contrary to what all the Dak homers say, he doesn't seem to have an agenda. In his video he showed that other options were wide open and that Dak needs way too much time to read either side. Picks 2on1 instead of 1on1s and so on...
Not saying Dak sucks or lost the game for us, really not interested in this unnessecary discussion. They all f*cked it up that day. But despite the two interceptions they scored alot of points so imo overall the offense didn't do too bad. It's just that they can't deliver in clutch situations time and time again. I mean Cooper's offense could. Haven't seen that from Dak's offense in a while. They always bring 100%. Sometimes it's enough, sometimes it isn't. But where are those 105% you need sometimes? That extra mile that pushes you over the edge in close games?
So where is the problem? Don't know...
No. You love something else.
Well I'm not saying I know more about football than Kurt or Michael or even most of the people here. You guys were practically raised with football while I started @ 12 or so. But when the experts have completely opposite opinions about something, all you can do is have your own. And imo the first interception was avoidable. There was a one on one on the left side but he chose the heaviest traffic. Could have even ran a few yards to the left.
No no . . . I love Dak and I love when the National Media defends Him. . . . Especially when Horse face and Mr Effeminate Cat Lover take turns defending Him . . I love it . . .Helps to prove my Point. . Its like fact Checking
This is the problem and it can't be measured. . . . Dak sucks . . Cooper is better . . .
