Twitter: FS1 - Sharpe "Dak Throwing with Anticipation, CeeDee Ad Libbing"

From the Packers game alone, I’ve learned from posters:
- When WRs run the wrong route it’s Daks fault
- Tolbert lining offsides was Daks fault
- The defense played harder for Rush and wouldnt have given up the 14 point lead

I wish I was kidding.
I know man....and you know I'm not satisfied with Dak's play but posters on this site make it hard to say anything about him when you have guys with a clear motive doing the critiquing....
 
It is a bigger issue in house than you would believe.
There is some major friction taking place behind closed doors that is being suppressed, that is all I'm saying.
Sorry that I can't provide a link.
You can't provide a link because its a myth. The team can't stop the run. I don't care if they don't like each other. I don't care about any of that crap. Stop the run and we don't have this talk. Because right now you could have Pat Mahomes at QB and if you can't stop the run its for nothing. anything els is just a excuse this point.
 

giphy.gif

Quoting Sharpe who pretty much gives Dak an F grade pretty much after every game ......ouch
 
Is it possible Dak was trying to go over the top to Lamb? That ball looks a little wobbly by the time it’s intercepted. Perhaps it was tipped or Dak threw a duck.
 
The reason why I trust Kurt Warner more than all these guys (including Irvin) is that he seems to do analyzing plays just for fun and to the contrary to what all the Dak homers say, he doesn't seem to have an agenda. In his video he showed that other options were wide open and that Dak needs way too much time to read either side. Picks 2on1 instead of 1on1s and so on...

Not saying Dak sucks or lost the game for us, really not interested in this unnessecary discussion. They all f*cked it up that day. But despite the two interceptions they scored alot of points so imo overall the offense didn't do too bad. It's just that they can't deliver in clutch situations time and time again. I mean Cooper's offense could. Haven't seen that from Dak's offense in a while. They always bring 100%. Sometimes it's enough, sometimes it isn't. But where are those 105% you need sometimes? That extra mile that pushes you over the edge in close games?

So where is the problem? Don't know... :(
 
The reason why I trust Kurt Warner more than all these guys (including Irvin) is that he seems to do analyzing plays just for fun and to the contrary to what all the Dak homers say, he doesn't seem to have an agenda. In his video he showed that other options were wide open and that Dak needs way too much time to read either side. Picks 2on1 instead of 1on1s and so on...

Not saying Dak sucks or lost the game for us, really not interested in this unnessecary discussion. They all f*cked it up that day. But despite the two interceptions they scored alot of points so imo overall the offense didn't do too bad. It's just that they can't deliver in clutch situations time and time again. I mean Cooper's offense could. Haven't seen that from Dak's offense in a while. They always bring 100%. Sometimes it's enough, sometimes it isn't. But where are those 105% you need sometimes? That extra mile that pushes you over the edge in close games?

So where is the problem? Don't know... :(
Kurt Warner was mostly correct, but he was wrong discussing both Interceptions. Packers used a triangle mid coverage (2 LBs riding the seems and a hovering/rover mid-Safety). The way to beat that is simple. CeeDee needs to recognize the sneaky formation (as does Dak). Instead of running a drag or a post, CeeDee needs to cut that route short and cut inside the LB and run a slant. He would have been wide open in between both LBs and way in front of the mid-Safety. Quick slant route adjustment would have dissected that tricky triangle mid coverage. Dak, CeeDee, Kellen Moore and the receivers, TEs and positional coaches need to study film and make easy but slight route adjustments and just practice the crap out of those adjustments.
 
Kurt Warner was mostly correct, but he was wrong discussing both Interceptions. Packers used a triangle mid coverage (2 LBs riding the seems and a hovering/rover mid-Safety). The way to beat that is simple. CeeDee needs to recognize the sneaky formation (as does Dak). Instead of running a drag or a post, CeeDee needs to cut that route short and cut inside the LB and run a slant. He would have been wide open in between both LBs and way in front of the mid-Safety. Quick slant route adjustment would have dissected that tricky triangle mid coverage. Dak, CeeDee, Kellen Moore and the receivers, TEs and positional coaches need to study film and make easy but slight route adjustments and just practice the crap out of those adjustments.
Well I'm not saying I know more about football than Kurt or Michael or even most of the people here. You guys were practically raised with football while I started @ 12 or so. But when the experts have completely opposite opinions about something, all you can do is have your own. And imo the first interception was avoidable. There was a one on one on the left side but he chose the heaviest traffic. Could have even ran a few yards to the left.

But coulda woulda, these things happen. Actually I'm not mad at the interceptions. I'm mad at like I said "the missing extra mile" on this team. If I call correctly, the last time they won that kind of close game was against the Patriots last year. Think about it. Rogers coming off a horrible streak and he just delivers against us. Because he just didn't want to lose against us. And I said it before the game in a thread here, he's just that guy. Pisses me off that we don't have that mentality.
 
No. You love something else.
No no . . . I love Dak and I love when the National Media defends Him. . . . Especially when Horse face and Mr Effeminate Cat Lover take turns defending Him . . I love it . . .Helps to prove my Point. . Its like fact Checking

Love it . . . I love Dak . . . So much
 
Well I'm not saying I know more about football than Kurt or Michael or even most of the people here. You guys were practically raised with football while I started @ 12 or so. But when the experts have completely opposite opinions about something, all you can do is have your own. And imo the first interception was avoidable. There was a one on one on the left side but he chose the heaviest traffic. Could have even ran a few yards to the left.

But coulda woulda, these things happen. Actually I'm not mad at the interceptions. I'm mad at like I said "the missing extra mile" on this team. If I call correctly, the last time they won that kind of close game was against the Patriots last year. Think about it. Rogers coming off a horrible streak and he just delivers against us. Because he just didn't want to lose against us. And I said it before the game in a thread here, he's just that guy. Pisses me off that we don't have that mentality.
This is the problem and it can't be measured. . . . Dak sucks . . Cooper is better . . .

Cooper understands where His Receivers should be based upon the Defense shown.

Dark Stares down his intended target and forces Horrible situations

That's it . I am done
 
I'm not the biggest Dak fan, but it's a problem if the QB doesn't trust his WRs. That's what's going to eventually happen.

There didnt seem to be a trust (or communication) problem when Dak was throwing CeeDee 150yards/11 for an average of 13.6. (73.3% success).

Again, I ask, why are we using the timed slant (to CD) when it doesnt suit CeeDee/nor Dak (if you take that those 3 interceptions on the play in two games, probably wouldnt have been completed even if CeeDee took the correct route).

Try it with a more physical receiver or baller, maybe a receiver we're under using atm?
 
DEFEND DAK MUST DEFEND DAK EVERYBODY ELSE TO BLAME MUST DEFEND DAK


Is that what you Dakites write on your walls all the time as that is how you act on here.
 
Back
Top