theogt
Surrealist
- Messages
- 45,846
- Reaction score
- 5,912
You didn't even qualify "definitive critique" to even Garrett, much less any particular criticism of Garrett, thus it's irrelevant to the critique that you're attacking in terms of Garrett.CoCo;3273451 said:Original Post...
"I do think people here can be ridiculously hard on Garrett. But I don't give much credibility to those folks who poo-poo Garrett's lack of experience but at the same time consider themselves fully qualified to provide definitive critique from their couch. Sure, share an opinion. But couch it in a little humility just in case (*gasp*) you could be wrong."
I reworded to add clarity to the original post above. It doesn't say something entirely different. "Definitive critique" is certainly broader than looking at someone's resume.
But whatever you wish to believe...
The sole critique that your original post attacked was the one that "poo-poo
But if you want to claim that you intended something entirely different with more qualifiers and elaborations, then go right ahead.