Gallup TD that wasn’t

Jake

Beyond tired of Jerry
Messages
36,067
Reaction score
84,352
If he had gotten both feet down before hitting the ground it would've been a catch. Since he didn't he has to survive the landing.

With the call being incomplete there wasn't anything to change it.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,796
Reaction score
38,099
If he had gotten both feet down before hitting the ground it would've been a catch. Since he didn't he has to survive the landing.

With the call being incomplete there wasn't anything to change it.

I didn't agree with what Blandino said about it, but when the official said he didn't get his second foot down, that changed things.
 

Dallasfann

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,415
Reaction score
7,427
The worst call was the 35 yard completion in the first half that was a clear incomplete pass for the Texans. Under every single rule in the book that was a clear drop. The fact it was reviewed and still called a catch was just pure comedy gold.
 

RonWashington

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,820
Reaction score
9,397
It was incomplete. But we scored so the issue is moot.


No I just thought it was a catch but what Jake says makes sense he has to get both feet down survive the hit . The Texans defense played there collective posteriors off , hats off to them . The 2nd round safety they got in the draft this year Jalen Pitre he’s got future star written on his resume . And remind me again why Maliek Collins is an ex Cowboy . Sure wouldn’t mind seeing him in the gaps .
 

MarcusRock

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,432
Reaction score
18,084
I thought Gallup hit the ground with his back ball still in hand when it comes out AFTER He hit the turf . Why no catch , he seemed to control it as he goes down . Is the NFL right on this one . I thought not .

Gallup never even got the 2nd foot down but if you go down to the going to the ground rule you have to survive the ground and maintain possession if you don't complete all parts of the general catch rule. Gallup didn't.

RULE 8 FORWARD PASS, BACKWARD PASS, FUMBLE
SECTION 1

ARTICLE 3. COMPLETED OR INTERCEPTED PASS. A player who makes a catch may advance the ball. A forward pass is
complete (by the offense) or intercepted (by the defense) in the field of play, at the sideline, or in the end zone if a player, who is
inbounds:
(a) secures control of the ball in his hands or arms prior to the ball touching the ground; and
(b) touches the ground inbounds with both feet or with any part of his body other than his hands; and
(c) after (a) and (b) have been fulfilled, performs any act common to the game (e.g., tuck the ball away, extend it forward, take
an additional step, turn upfield, or avoid or ward off an opponent), or he maintains control of the ball long enough to do so.

Notes:
(1) Movement of the ball does not automatically result in loss of control.

(2) If a player, who satisfied (a) and (b), but has not satisfied (c), contacts the ground and loses control of the ball, it is an
incomplete pass if the ball hits the ground before he regains control, or if he regains control out of bounds.

(3) A receiver is considered a player in a defenseless posture (See Rule 12, Section 2, Article 9) throughout the entire
process of the catch and until the player is capable of avoiding or warding off the impending contact of an opponent.
(4) If a pass is caught simultaneously by two eligible opponents, and both players retain it, the ball belongs to the passers.
It is not a simultaneous catch if a player gains control first and an opponent subsequently gains joint control. If the ball is
muffed after simultaneous touching by two such players, all the players of the passing team become eligible to catch the
loose ball.
(5) If a player, who is in possession of the ball, is held up and carried out of bounds by an opponent before both feet or any
part of his body other than his hands touches the ground inbounds, it is a completed or intercepted pass. It is not
necessary for the player to maintain control of the ball when he lands out of bounds.
 

StylisticS

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,859
Reaction score
6,269
The worst call was the 35 yard completion in the first half that was a clear incomplete pass for the Texans. Under every single rule in the book that was a clear drop. The fact it was reviewed and still called a catch was just pure comedy gold.
Yeah I didn’t get that. It clearly hit the ground and it moved. That should be an easy incompletion after review.
 

baltcowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,200
Reaction score
18,752
The worst call was the 35 yard completion in the first half that was a clear incomplete pass for the Texans. Under every single rule in the book that was a clear drop. The fact it was reviewed and still called a catch was just pure comedy gold.
If the referees can keep the games close for television and betting purposes, they will.
 

RustyBourneHorse

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,084
Reaction score
48,715
I think that it was incomplete. However, the issue I had was the one that was to the Texans WR that we challenged. The tip of the ball moved when it was in the ground. Therefore, I think Mike was right, and that should have been overturned to an incomplete pass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BAT

Cowboyz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,117
Reaction score
10,015
Gallup never even got the 2nd foot down but if you go down to the going to the ground rule you have to survive the ground and maintain possession if you don't complete all parts of the general catch rule. Gallup didn't.

RULE 8 FORWARD PASS, BACKWARD PASS, FUMBLE
SECTION 1

ARTICLE 3. COMPLETED OR INTERCEPTED PASS. A player who makes a catch may advance the ball. A forward pass is
complete (by the offense) or intercepted (by the defense) in the field of play, at the sideline, or in the end zone if a player, who is
inbounds:
(a) secures control of the ball in his hands or arms prior to the ball touching the ground; and
(b) touches the ground inbounds with both feet or with any part of his body other than his hands; and
(c) after (a) and (b) have been fulfilled, performs any act common to the game (e.g., tuck the ball away, extend it forward, take
an additional step, turn upfield, or avoid or ward off an opponent), or he maintains control of the ball long enough to do so.

Notes:
(1) Movement of the ball does not automatically result in loss of control.

(2) If a player, who satisfied (a) and (b), but has not satisfied (c), contacts the ground and loses control of the ball, it is an
incomplete pass if the ball hits the ground before he regains control, or if he regains control out of bounds.

(3) A receiver is considered a player in a defenseless posture (See Rule 12, Section 2, Article 9) throughout the entire
process of the catch and until the player is capable of avoiding or warding off the impending contact of an opponent.
(4) If a pass is caught simultaneously by two eligible opponents, and both players retain it, the ball belongs to the passers.
It is not a simultaneous catch if a player gains control first and an opponent subsequently gains joint control. If the ball is
muffed after simultaneous touching by two such players, all the players of the passing team become eligible to catch the
loose ball.
(5) If a player, who is in possession of the ball, is held up and carried out of bounds by an opponent before both feet or any
part of his body other than his hands touches the ground inbounds, it is a completed or intercepted pass. It is not
necessary for the player to maintain control of the ball when he lands out of bounds.

Kills me that after all these years with this rule, "fans" still don't know the difference.

It was pretty clear when the ball popped out that it wasn't a catch.
 

MarcusRock

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,432
Reaction score
18,084
Kills me that after all these years with this rule, "fans" still don't know the difference.

It was pretty clear when the ball popped out that it wasn't a catch.

Fans still don't think Lamb had a foot on the line in the endzone that time. Emotion fills in details that ... did ... not ... happen.
 

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
62,818
Reaction score
39,996
I thought Gallup hit the ground with his back ball still in hand when it comes out AFTER He hit the turf . Why no catch , he seemed to control it as he goes down . Is the NFL right on this one . I thought not .

He never really had the ball put away. It was clearly an incomplete pass.
 

3rdEyewarrior

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,916
Reaction score
3,567
I thought Gallup hit the ground with his back ball still in hand when it comes out AFTER He hit the turf . Why no catch , he seemed to control it as he goes down . Is the NFL right on this one . I thought not .
For a guy who has solid deep speed at 4.51, he sure isnt very strong.
 

MarcusRock

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,432
Reaction score
18,084
In the 49ers they just gave McCaffery a TD with the same situation

I'm watching the game. There was no taking a step, it was a toe drag. Pereira in the booth said exactly that to clearly distinguish it from the Lamb play. Stop it. Lol.
 

805BoysInBlue

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,529
Reaction score
10,289
I'm watching the game. There was no taking a step, it was a toe drag. Pereira in the booth said exactly that to clearly distinguish it from the Lamb play. Stop it. Lol.
His heel touched out of bounds exactly like CDs catch gtfoh
 
Top