Tusan_Homichi
Heisenberg
- Messages
- 11,059
- Reaction score
- 3,485
I guess in the end it was good that we didn't get the 2-point conversion. We would have gone into OT and anything could have happened.
Catch-22;1695409 said:Anyone else think it was terrible?
A great creator at the QB position and you limit him to one option by calling a fade to a WR with the dropsies?
Personally, I wouldn't roll out cause that leaves you with far less options, and you must predict that they are going to blitz.AdamJT13;1695463 said:Fasano??
Personally, when I'm down to one play like that (a two-point conversion, fourth-and-goal or whatever), I want the QB to have as many options as possible. I'd rather roll him out one way or the other (giving him a possible scramble) and have at least two receivers from which he can choose.
Still, Owens vs. Greer 1-on-1 isn't a bad option. Had it not been a crucial play, I think they throw the interference flag. He had his arms on Owens and wasn't looking for the ball. That should be interference. But I didn't expect to get the call.
me too they were pissing me off so bad, these guys will go down as the worst MNF crew past, present, or future. period the end.thssanders;1695451 said:I muted my tv halfway through the 4th quarter... couldn't listen to it anymore.
nicodywill;1695638 said:me too they were pissing me off so bad, these guys will go down as the worst MNF crew past, present, or future. period the end.
I don't think there would have been enough time for something like that, the Bills were amped up and were bringing the house and something like that couldn't have developed quickly enough and there wouldn't have been enough people left at home to block anyone on that type of play.It was a good call in my opinion.mmohican29;1695628 said:The endzone fade is one of the most overused and underproducing calls in all of sports and was a terrible play call.
The best play calls the Cowboys have at the goal line involve playaction and multi-tierd routes with Barber Witten and Owens and a fourth scramble option that utilizes Romo's athletic ability. (See Dallas Cowboys vs. Tampa Bay Bucs Thanksgiving day last year)
The first half I watched at a bar down the street from my house and at halftime I was ready to go home if you know what I mean, so I went home and would mute it then take it off mute and cuss them out through the TV then mute it again and did that for an hour and a half.Ozzu;1695642 said:I was telling my girlfriend that somewhere around the middle of the 3rd quarter when they were all up on Edwards' jock again. I told her I couldn't stand it anymore and muted it.
Of course, that didn't last very long. I can't do games with no sound.
nicodywill;1695650 said:The first half I watched at a bar down the street from my house and at halftime I was ready to go home if you know what I mean, so I went home and would mute it then take it off mute and cuss them out through the TV then mute it again and did that for an hour and a half.
SkinsandTerps;1695516 said:So you dont consider Fasano another option ?
Aside from Witten, Owens, Crayton, and Barber/Jones ?
AdamJT13;1695725 said:Well, if I was going to "take advantage" of one of our weapons, Fasano wouldn't be one of my first five or six choices.
what was terrible was owens using his body instead of his hands. in the words of skip bayless, last night he was "terrible owens"Catch-22;1695409 said:Anyone else think it was terrible?
A great creator at the QB position and you limit him to one option by calling a fade to a WR with the dropsies?
Me too. That and the quick screen pass to a wideout. The risk/reward of that play just doesn't seem worthwhile.Hostile;1695470 said:I hate the fade route. The only time I have ever thought it was a great call was when Cris Carter was the target. The guy could just flat out run that route.