Tabascocat
Dexternjack
- Messages
- 27,789
- Reaction score
- 38,840
It is more so an organizational nepotism starting from the top
Well, it is pretty obvious what the real problem is. It's not Garrett's "coaching tree", which I think is ridiculous to even act like a rookie head coach will have any kind of tree anways, but it's Jerry's ineptitude as the general manager.
How many names do you recognize on the Panthers staff?
http://www.panthers.com/team/coaches.html
Patriots?
http://www.patriots.com/team/coaches
Garrett didn't have that. From the start he was threatened with coaches with legitimate experience. Hudson Houck was a retread from the 90s. A legacy coach who was at the time bouncing around the league. He coached the cowboys line of the 90s, was fired, and then brought back under Garrett...
If you're arguing that he didn't have adequate coaching experience to be a head coach, I agree. Anyways, it is clear that Jerry Jones is making the staff changes, not Jason Garrett. I am saying that you are shooting the right bullet, but aiming at the wrong target. It is Jerry Jones that has created the circus atmosphere, for 20 years running. Either way, there have been some extremely experienced coaches that have been here under Jason Garrett, and it has nothing to do with his tree.
You know Garrett wasn't mentally tough when he wouldn't hire Norv Turner...
Or Dan Reeves... Or anyone with any clout that could make him feel uncomfortable.
Wow did not know that.
you would think the jones would not allow this.
One of the biggest reasons I think our team has struggled over the years is Garrett's weak coaching tree.
Most coaches inherit extremely experienced coaches across their staff from previous positions...
We hired a 2 year QBs coach to be our offensive coordinator. Someone who hadn't built those relationships.
As a result we have him hiring his brothers and former roommates or associates.
Joe Baker is a great example of this. Baker was a receiver for Garrett back at Princeton. This guy is a JAG and hasn't developed any safeties since he has been here in 2012, and yet here he is... still on the staff...
It was nepotism that got Garrett hired and it is nepotism that continues to sink our team.
Who is the Cowboys' director of pro scouting? Judd Garrett.... his qualifications? He was a tight ends coach for 2 years for the Rams... He did not rise in the scouting ranks to become director.
In what other organization has a guy with no experience immediately been put on as an OC, and then a few years after, after being part of a staff that resulted in the team giving up, handed the reins over to that green guy?
His father didn't hire him and he fired his brother. Hiring people you've worked with before isn't nepotism.
Begging the question does not make your premise true. I'm sure you think because you cannot think of anyone else that you've made your case. It's real easy to blow up.
Andy Reid hired his sons repeatedly despite being drug addicts. Mike Shanahan hired his son Kyle. Wade Phillips has hired his son repeatedly. The Nolan family did it. I could go on.
Those are actually examples of nepotism too as opposed to the OP who struggles with what the word means.
Sometimes you can get away with nepotism when you're a highly qualified coach, but when you yourself are inexperienced it is a force multiplier.
And again, I don't think you know what nepotism is.
It helps when you are going to make a claim that someone doesn't know what it means that you demonstrate that you instead understand. What you do here is bluster. Typical if not persuasive.
Nepotism is when you hire your family members. Sure its been used more broadly but only in the case where it is without regard to merit. You at no point address that caveat. The latin root of the word is 'nephew' so a latin to english translation would be nephewism. The reason why it is so reviled in American circles is because we were founded by rebelling against a dynastic monarchy replete with nobility.
Please show where he was forced to fire his brother.
And I've demonstrated that.