GIFs of Devin Street's Catches

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Like I said Fuzzy Wuzzy Lumpkins, we will see at final cuts.

The problem is that you just cannot grasp that NFL teams have specified roles for receivers and keep five or six based on how they fit into compartments.

You know, just like telling the difference between coverages.

But keep working at your new hobby though. Watch a lot of "film". One day, you might be able to keep up.

Now you are changing the subject. That is telling much more than your bluster.

We will see what? That our WR depth sucks and you never made an argument at any point? Qualitative generalization. Nice. I'd rather not use your viewpoint frankly so have fun with that.

As I said before if you want to say that it was cover 1 and Dixon was supposed to handle an intermediate break that is fine. At the same time it should be very disconcerting that he was completely oblivious to the fact that Lindsey had been dominated on the route and was in trail position losing ground right off the snap. He clearly never looked and I guarantee you that should be something he should see. It is literally right in front of him.

I said this before over there. You ignored it and then throw the jab here. that is a good way of deflecting.

 

[Alexander]

Now you are changing the subject. That is telling much more than your bluster.

This is the second time you have used the word bluster. Must be word of the day 1b.

We will see what? That our WR depth sucks and you never made an argument at any point? Qualitative generalization. Nice. I'd rather not use your viewpoint frankly so have fun with that.

I made a significant argument but you just could not grasp it. And not once did I say the WR depth sucked.

If you get five strong WRs, all doing specified roles in your offense, you have a good five deep group.

I do not care what the sixth and seventh WRs can do unless they show enough to threaten one of the top five for a role.

You are the one who waltzed into this thread demanding acknowledgement of Byrd, Boyd etc. Sorry, don't care unless they show they have utility. If that means you characterize that as me saying the WR depth "sucks", you too can have fun with that fallacy.

I believe this is where the poor debaters on this board insert the oh so overused "strawman" meme, because that is exactly what you just did.

As I said before if you want to say that it was cover 1 and Dixon was supposed to handle an intermediate break that is fine. At the same time it should be very disconcerting that he was completely oblivious to the fact that Lindsey had been dominated on the route and was in trail position losing ground right off the snap. He clearly never looked and I guarantee you that should be something he should see. It is literally right in front of him.

I said this before over there. You ignored it and then throw the jab here. that is a good way of deflecting.

Sorry, never said Cover 1 either.

Oh look, you used my word of the day for you, deflection.

Glad I could be of service.

 

[texbumthelife]

You two need your own forum.

 

[dstovall5]

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

This is the second time you have used the word bluster. Must be word of the day 1b.


I made a significant argument but you just could not grasp it. And not once did I say the WR depth sucked.

If you get five strong WRs, all doing specified roles in your offense, you have a good five deep group.

I do not care what the sixth and seventh WRs can do unless they show enough to threaten one of the top five for a role.

You are the one who waltzed into this thread demanding acknowledgement of Byrd, Boyd etc. Sorry, don't care unless they show they have utility. If that means you characterize that as me saying the WR depth "sucks", you too can have fun with that fallacy.

I believe this is where the poor debaters on this board insert the oh so overused "strawman" meme, because that is exactly what you just did.



Sorry, never said Cover 1 either.

Oh look, you used my word of the day for you, deflection.

Glad I could be of service.

Well look at that. if I mock you repeatedly about addressing specific points you finally can do it even if not well.

The thing is Alex i don't think that you're 'not that smart.' I can respect your intelligence. What I have issue with is your constant anger and insecurity. it makes it quite easy to troll you because well frankly your buttons are pretty obvious. i will try and stick to the point instead.

I'm not infallible. I said cover 1 instead of cover 3. Its clear that i understand what the coverages mean even if brain fart from time to time. But hey you won a point even if you miss the forest for a tree. Thanks for demonstrating I'm fallible. Feel better?

Basically what you have done is said that the WR corps is 5 receivers deep and that they have roles. In addition to that you have named who you claim to be the 4th WR in Buffalo. That is great. I am still waiting on you having a point about our particular 5 receivers. Mostly you have assumptive bluster.

As for Boyd, I didn't demand anything. Try again. i just pointed out that i thought they had played well in the scrimmage. Unlike you, i realize that it isn't just about you and me. There are other people that read this. Well, lookee there, people actually agreed with my point. if there isn't that much difference between the 5th and 6th receiver and both have been making plays then i think that observation has a place in the discussion about WR depth.

I know you want to frame the argument as 5 deep and nothing else matters but well this isn't just about you, Alex. Some people agree with my viewpoint.

i also think the discussion of Ogletree is apt. He was our WR3 a couple years ago and this is the same team. i think it fair to say that we have better WR depth this year as opposed to Cowboys history.

Oh and btw Robert Woods is a starter on the Bills depth chart.

http://www.buffalobills.com/team/depth-chart.html

So anyway you took umbrage for putting words in your mouth, i think that is fair so then how would you describe the Cowboys WR depth?

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

You two need your own forum.

Fair enough. If our back and forth is detracting to you guys experience, i will just put him on ignore. It's not worth it.

 

[CATCH17]

trade

Awesome sig.

 

[texbumthelife]

Fair enough. If our back and forth is detracting to you guys experience, i will just put him on ignore. It's not worth it.

Honestly, I don't do the ignore thing, but I stopped replying to him because of his insufferable arrogance and audacious attitude.

I don't have a problem with you, but you keep poking the bear.

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Honestly, I don't do the ignore thing, but I stopped replying to him because of his insufferable arrogance and audacious attitude.

I don't have a problem with you, but you keep poking the bear.

Ahh I did it. I have been thinking about it for awhile and it makes sense. It's not healthy doing what I have been doing.

 

[guag]

All or most of his routes/passes he was on the field:

The play at 4:16 (Vaughan)... was that a designed running play for the QB? Don't think so, but it seems like he reacted very quickly to the rush. Showed some good awareness there.

 

[gmoney112]

The play at 4:16 (Vaughan)... was that a designed running play for the QB? Don't think so, but it seems like he reacted very quickly to the rush. Showed some good awareness there.

I was posting this same thing, i like the awareness in the 3rd gif, recognizes the blitz and turns his hips to run upfield to get the cb in to a backpedal, then just plants his foot and instantly creates separation. It's hard to teach instincts like that but it looks like he finds ways to get open.

 

[Cebrin]

Awesome sig.

It'd be even better if both were holding trophies. Let's hope.

 

[guag]

I was posting this same thing, i like the awareness in the 3rd gif, recognizes the blitz and turns his hips to run upfield to get the cb in to a backpedal, then just plants his foot and instantly creates separation. It's hard to teach instincts like that but it looks like he finds ways to get open.

He's definitely got some nice evasive moves in the face of pressure. I recall him missing a lot of throws early in the offseason in rookie camp and mini camp, but I think he's starting to get a little more comfortable out there.

 

[Yuma Cactus]

If 6 are kept I go with Newsome slightly over Byrd. I don't think Boyd is in the competition.

 

[CCBoy]

Why would I bother to do that when he is actually as good or better than our third?

Here is your word of the day: deflection.

Why? Serious?

 

[CCBoy]

If 6 are kept I go with Newsome slightly over Byrd. I don't think Boyd is in the competition.

Yuma, I've been catching a little of the Newsome dynamics coming out as well...I still like Byrd to now. Three weeks of game film should answer the last question on who fills the bottom slot.

 

[CCBoy]

Like I said Fuzzy Wuzzy Lumpkins, we will see at final cuts.

The problem is that you just cannot grasp that NFL teams have specified roles for receivers and keep five or six based on how they fit into compartments.

You know, just like telling the difference between coverages.

But keep working at your new hobby though. Watch a lot of "film". One day, you might be able to keep up.

Fuzzy, with his film study, is probably going to be one of the most informed fans on site. As his study over these next three weeks will say it all as to the Franchise's view as well. The coaching staff will be doing the very same thing.

 

[big dog cowboy]

trade

I don't see how that helps this year because all we would receive is a pick next year. Therefore I don't see that happening.

 

[CCBoy]

Well look at that. if I mock you repeatedly about addressing specific points you finally can do it even if not well.

The thing is Alex i don't think that you're 'not that smart.' I can respect your intelligence. What I have issue with is your constant anger and insecurity. it makes it quite easy to troll you because well frankly your buttons are pretty obvious. i will try and stick to the point instead.

I'm not infallible. I said cover 1 instead of cover 3. Its clear that i understand what the coverages mean even if brain fart from time to time. But hey you won a point even if you miss the forest for a tree. Thanks for demonstrating I'm fallible. Feel better?

Basically what you have done is said that the WR corps is 5 receivers deep and that they have roles. In addition to that you have named who you claim to be the 4th WR in Buffalo. That is great. I am still waiting on you having a point about our particular 5 receivers. Mostly you have assumptive bluster.

As for Boyd, I didn't demand anything. Try again. i just pointed out that i thought they had played well in the scrimmage. Unlike you, i realize that it isn't just about you and me. There are other people that read this. Well, lookee there, people actually agreed with my point. if there isn't that much difference between the 5th and 6th receiver and both have been making plays then i think that observation has a place in the discussion about WR depth.

I know you want to frame the argument as 5 deep and nothing else matters but well this isn't just about you, Alex. Some people agree with my viewpoint.

i also think the discussion of Ogletree is apt. He was our WR3 a couple years ago and this is the same team. i think it fair to say that we have better WR depth this year as opposed to Cowboys history.

Oh and btw Robert Woods is a starter on the Bills depth chart.

http://www.buffalobills.com/team/depth-chart.html

So anyway you took umbrage for putting words in your mouth, i think that is fair so then how would you describe the Cowboys WR depth?

Wait Fuzzy, I'll contact XWalker to send him one of my decoder rings...

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Fuzzy, with his film study, is probably going to be one of the most informed fans on site. As his study over these next three weeks will say it all as to the Franchise's view as well. The coaching staff will be doing the very same thing.

I watch the coaches film when i can get it it but the archives at NFLrewind can be spotty. I have not been involved in organized football since middle school. my parents would not let me play after I got my bell rung a couple times.

Im sure in coaching circles they have their own way of identifying, categorizing, and the like that I am 100% clueless of. That is part of the fun of it. Trying to figure all that stuff out.