Good Wade stat

Messages
157
Reaction score
0
As one analyst put it in your own hometown news....

Wade will be the headcoach in Dallas for 2010.... that is great news.... if you are the Commanders, Eagles, or Giants.
 

wileedog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
2,393
IgorTheMan99;3248749 said:
Two NFC East championships in 3 years? Needs to be fired.
Two wild card appearances in 4 years? Greatest coach ever. (Parcells)

But Parcells is the genius head coach and Phillips is the pathetic moron. :eek:

Please stop this horrible argument.

Give Wade the 2003 Cowboys Roster and this becomes relevant. Did Wade win the NFC East with Quincy ****** Carter as the QB and Troy Hambrick the starting RB?
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
IgorTheMan99;3248749 said:
The 2009 Dallas Cowboys were one offensive line player short of the Super Bowl this year. Imagine if we'd had two Doug Frees rather than just the one.
We just needed another Doug Free and we not only would have beaten Minnesota but we'd also have trounced the Saints to reach the Super Bowl?

Quick, someone get Jerry on the Crazy Phone.
 

wileedog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
2,393
Alexander;3250026 said:
We just needed another Doug Free and we not only would have beaten Minnesota but we'd also have trounced the Saints to reach the Super Bowl?

Quick, someone get Jerry on the Crazy Phone.

I think 44-6 was Kyle Kosier's fault myself, while were at it.
 

Cover 2

Pessimists Unite!!!
Messages
3,496
Reaction score
452
Alexander;3250026 said:
We just needed another Doug Free and we not only would have beaten Minnesota but we'd also have trounced the Saints to reach the Super Bowl?

Quick, someone get Jerry on the Crazy Phone.
If Flozell hadn't gotten injured Doug Free wouldn't have even been in the game. Colombo was routinely getting beat by Ray Edwards, but the coaching staff didn't see a need to put Free in for him. If Free would have started that game (like he should have), then Flo probably wouldn't have gotten hurt because the events leading up to his injury would have been altered. But Colombo was the vet, and on this team that means your job is secure.
 

Draegerman

Internet Somebody
Messages
3,706
Reaction score
4
Cover 2;3250036 said:
If Flozell hadn't gotten injured Doug Free wouldn't have even been in the game. Colombo was routinely getting beat by Ray Edwards, but the coaching staff didn't see a need to put Free in for him. If Free would have started that game (like he should have), then Flo probably wouldn't have gotten hurt because the events leading up to his injury would have been altered. But Colombo was the vet, and on this team that means your job is secure.

This is a very good point you're making and why I question Wade as the head coach. Garrett has no business being on the field during the game. He needs to have his ginger butt sitting up in the booth so he can analyze what's happening with his offense during play. Hell, the same thing goes for the freakin' defensive coordinator! WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!
:bang2:

Now I'm getting all pissed again. Give me a minute while I try to get back to my happy place. (You're a pretty Draegeman, a pretty Draegerman, The Cowboys are winning superbowls, superbowls for all your friends, hiring Wade was the right choice, is the right choice, you're a lovely Draegerman, so lovely, women crave you , love you, you're...a...rock...STAR!)

Okay, here's how it should've broken down. Wade (as the HC) notices pressure getting to Romo from Columbo's side. He radios up to Garrett and demands to know what the hell is happening to Romo. Garrett either already knows the answer or he'll make sure to pay more attention to it and let Wade know. Garrett suddenly discovers Columbo is the cause. Wade tells Columbo, "Not today kid", and sends Free out to take his place. If Flozell goes down than Columbo goes out again and takes his place.

How hard does this need to be? Is it 34-3 hard? We think not!
 

BubbleScreen

Active Member
Messages
964
Reaction score
107
wileedog;3250023 said:
Please stop this horrible argument.

Give Wade the 2003 Cowboys Roster and this becomes relevant. Did Wade win the NFC East with Quincy ****** Carter as the QB and Troy Hambrick the starting RB?

It's not a horrible argument. As a GM, Parcells is far better than Phillips. No one seriously argues Phillips is a personnel man. He has his favorites, and I'm glad my namesake and Brooking were on the team in 09, but you don't send Phillips to the store to get your football groceries.

As a coach, Phillips has been more successful. This is not debatable. Parcells' Cowboys never won the NFC East.

Could Phillips have been this successful if he were hired in 03? Definitely not.

I don't credit much, if any, of the talent upgrade to Parcells as a coach. I would even argue the draft picks have been better since Bobby Carpenter in the first round of 2006.
 

BubbleScreen

Active Member
Messages
964
Reaction score
107
Draegerman;3250232 said:
Okay, here's how it should've broken down. Wade (as the HC) notices pressure getting to Romo from Columbo's side. He radios up to Garrett and demands to know what the hell is happening to Romo. Garrett either already knows the answer or he'll make sure to pay more attention to it and let Wade know. Garrett suddenly discovers Columbo is the cause. Wade tells Columbo, "Not today kid", and sends Free out to take his place. If Flozell goes down than Columbo goes out again and takes his place.

This is the strongest argument against Wade, by far. All coaches do this to some extent, but Wade is horrendous at it. It's his job to play the players that give the team the best chance to win, and Columbo was not that guy in Minnesota.
 

CanadianCowboysFan

Lightning Rod
Messages
25,371
Reaction score
8,146
Draegerman;3250015 said:
He's actually 1-3 in the playoffs because you have to count that debacle in Philly last year where the winner of that game made the playoffs.

BTW, and it's just a friendly suggestion, you don't write it as "an SB". The correct way is "a SB". The rule of thumb is only to use the word "an" when the following word after it begins with a vowel (e.g. an avatar). I'm only mentioning this to you because you did it twice in a row with both of your responses here.

If you are going to quibble, then you are wrong, he is not 1-3 in the playoffs as the game in Philadelphia was not a playoff game. However, if you want to be that way, then in reality, he is 4-3 in playoff games as the NO, Washington and Eagle games were playoff games as we had to win them to get in.

Speaking of grammar, is saying you did it "twice in a row with both of your responses here" really good grammar?
 

Draegerman

Internet Somebody
Messages
3,706
Reaction score
4
CanadianCowboysFan;3250277 said:
If you are going to quibble, then you are wrong, he is not 1-3 in the playoffs as the game in Philadelphia was not a playoff game.

Since I've already explained it to you with the "win or go home" revelation, how else would you describe it? What makes you think that I'm so wrong?

However, if you want to be that way, then in reality, he is 4-3 in playoff games as the NO, Washington and Eagle games were playoff games as we had to win them to get in.

Or is possible that you mean we win all those games or face not being the NFC East Champions? Because I'm pretty sure (in a mathematical sense) we could still be in the playoffs as a wildcard team. Last year in Philly, we were not given such an option. (btw, can you appreciate the irony in the underlined?).

Speaking of grammar, is saying you did it "twice in a row with both of your responses here" really good grammar?

How exactly is it bad grammar? Better yet, how would you write it to make it more grammatically correct and still to the point? I ask because you really did write your grammatical mistake twice in a row with both of your responses here.

The difference between your grammatical mistake and mine (as you seem to find) is that I, at least, showed you where you made a mistake and then I provided you with the correct example for such a rule in which to correct it. You, on the other hand, did not and now you want to pretend to be the English guru to which you're clearly not.

The bottom line is do you wish to take me on in this field (to which you're ill-equipped to handle), or do you lack the guts to see it through?
 

CanadianCowboysFan

Lightning Rod
Messages
25,371
Reaction score
8,146
Draegerman, I didn't know you were the greatest grammarian of all time, did you go to Ivy League?

The fact I didn't call it a Super Bowl but shortened it to use just SB might very well have changed the proper usage. I really do not care all that much but since you are so insecure about yourself that you need to point out that in your view someone has used an incorrect usage and then point out that person did it two times twice in a row (a redundant word usage if I ever saw one), I will allow you to bask in an alleged victory.
 

Kilyin

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,041
Reaction score
244
Draegerman;3250015 said:
BTW, and it's just a friendly suggestion, you don't write it as "an SB". The correct way is "a SB". The rule of thumb is only to use the word "an" when the following word after it begins with a vowel (e.g. an avatar). I'm only mentioning this to you because you did it twice in a row with both of your responses here.

You're obviously not an English major, because you're absolutely wrong. Whether to use an or a is also determined by how you pronounce the following word. Since we're talking abbreviations, would you say 'a FBI agent' or 'an FBI agent'? The correct answer is an FBI agent.

If you're going to nitpick grammar, do your homework first.
 

Doomsay

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,542
Reaction score
6,160
wileedog;3250023 said:
Please stop this horrible argument.

Give Wade the 2003 Cowboys Roster and this becomes relevant. Did Wade win the NFC East with Quincy ****** Carter as the QB and Troy Hambrick the starting RB?


Got to attack that argument on a weakly basis. The Wade "inherited a playoff team" deniers.
 
Messages
157
Reaction score
0
Kilyin;3250621 said:
You're obviously not an English major, because you're absolutely wrong. Whether to use an or a is also determined by how you pronounce the following word. Since we're talking abbreviations, would you say 'a FBI agent' or 'an FBI agent'? The correct answer is an FBI agent.

If you're going to nitpick grammar, do your homework first.

pwnd!
 

wileedog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
2,393
IgorTheMan99;3250235 said:
As a coach, Phillips has been more successful. This is not debatable. Parcells' Cowboys never won the NFC East.

That's like saying Wade is a better race car driver because Parcell's couldn't win the Indy 500 with a Pinto.

Jimmy Johnson in 5 years went 44-36 as coach of the Cowboys. Lost a NFCC game and won 2 SBs.

Barry Switzer in only 3 years went 30-18 as coach of the Cowboys, lost a NFCC game and won a SB,

Barry Switzer > Jimmy Johnson.
 

Draegerman

Internet Somebody
Messages
3,706
Reaction score
4
CanadianCowboysFan;3250497 said:
Draegerman, I didn't know you were the greatest grammarian of all time, did you go to Ivy League?

The fact I didn't call it a Super Bowl but shortened it to use just SB might very well have changed the proper usage. I really do not care all that much but since you are so insecure about yourself that you need to point out that in your view someone has used an incorrect usage and then point out that person did it two times twice in a row (a redundant word usage if I ever saw one), I will allow you to bask in an alleged victory.

The funny thing about your first question is that I only have a GED. It's a long story with how I got there (head cheerleader, irate parents & pure laziness) but suffice to say, the people at Mensa are still shocked about that.

Regarding your second paragraph, what really bothers me about this is that I was only extending you a common courtesy. If I was making a similiar mistake with my post(s) (e.g. knowing when to us to, two or too), I would expect (or at least hope) one of you would extend me the same courtesy. You're treating it as an attack on your person and I can assure you that it's not. I wrote that you did it twice in both of your posts - I suppose that there is some redundancy with it but I was going for brevity rather than making it too wordy. That's all.

BTW, do you really believe that I'm insecure?:rolleyes:
 
Messages
157
Reaction score
0
Draegerman;3250852 said:
The funny thing about your first question is that I only have a GED.

Well, den whz in de earf wud yuz speaks concernin other peeps grammer?


Just sayin mate... lotta people here educated a whole hell of a lot more than a GED.
 

Draegerman

Internet Somebody
Messages
3,706
Reaction score
4
Kilyin;3250621 said:
You're obviously not an English major, because you're absolutely wrong. Whether to use an or a is also determined by how you pronounce the following word. Since we're talking abbreviations, would you say 'a FBI agent' or 'an FBI agent'? The correct answer is an FBI agent.

If you're going to nitpick grammar, do your homework first.

Oh this is just too rich. :lmao: To answer your silly question, I would use neither. The only proper article to use with your example (in the written form) is "the".

Having said that, why should I take the time to explain the exception to the rule with regard to choosing the correct indefinite article(s) in a sentence? I was simply pointing out a mistake he continued to make in both of his replies (do you see redundancy in that, CC?). It was an obvious mistake and I was only trying to help.

Anyway, since you want to have a "go" with me. Let's dance, shall we?

These are the rules regarding how to use the indefinite articles:


"A" goes before all words that begin with consonants.

a cat
a dog
a purple onion
a buffalo
a big apple

With one exception: Use "an" before unsounded h.

an honorable peace
an honest error


"An" goes before all words that begin with vowels:

an apricot
an egg
an Indian
an orbit
an uprising

With two exceptions: When "u" makes the same sound as the "y" in you, or "o" makes the same sound as "w" in won, then a is used.

a union
a united front
a unicorn
a used napkin
a U.S. ship
a one-legged man

Note: The choice of article is actually based upon the phonetic (sound) quality of the first letter in a word, not on the orthographic (written) representation of the letter. If the first letter makes a vowel-type sound, you use "an"; if the first letter would make a consonant-type sound, you use "a." So, if you consider the rule from a phonetic perspective, there aren't any exceptions. Since the 'h' hasn't any phonetic representation, no audible sound, in the first exception, the sound that follows the article is a vowel; consequently, 'an' is used. In the second exception, the word-initial 'y' sound (unicorn) is actually a glide [j] phonetically, which has consonantal properties; consequently, it is treated as a consonant, requiring 'a'.

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/591/01/

Now, Whinestein, I want you to show me where my example given to CC is incorrect and how your example is the correct form in the written letter. Granted, it's used phonetically in speech all the time but that doesn't make it right. The reason why we 'say' "an" before FBI is because the letter "F" makes an 'efff' sound phonetically speaking. My English Prof would eat your lunch, however, if you wrote "an" to the acronym or abbreviation form that begins with a consonant (e.g. an FBI). But we're talking semantics here or actually we're writing semantics. English profs all over this country have their silly little quirks, but one thing they would all agree on is "A SB" and not "An SB".

Have the last word (if you like), I'm leaving now to go hang out with a couple of fellow Green Berets so we can drink beer and make fun of pencil necks that teach silly English rules on a football forum.:eek:
 

Draegerman

Internet Somebody
Messages
3,706
Reaction score
4
FightingIrishman;3250629 said:

Oh, yea, he so 'pwnd' me. :rolleyes:

Like, dude, your village called and said you were missing. Now hurry up and run along while the adults are writing silly grammar rules.
 
Top