
Another fun exercise, if a fan wants to lose to Philadelphia, is he really a fan?
So allow me to ask a question or two.
First off, as projected right now, there are a couple of DTs lurking around 16 in the up coming draft. There is also a DE in the group. Plus an OT. And CB's. And there is someone who falls every year to the middle of the first round with projected top of first talent.
So my questions are these. Do you equate yesterday's win against back-ups to be a better option than a starting NT, DE, OT that might play six to nine years for this team?
So one win is better than a player who possibly could be here in 2023 starting for this team? Perhaps even a pro bowl players, or an All Pro. Sure it could go the opposite way, or there could be someone where Dallas will draft that is a player. But the higher up you are in the first round the closer you are to talent and the meat of the first round.
Now to the story.
It was 1988 and Dallas had nothing at quarterback but Steve Pelluer and a broken Danny White. This team was headed to one of the worst seasons (3-13) since the inaugural season of 1960 when they went 0-11-1. Now understand this franchise did not have one season between 1960 and 1988 where they won less than four games. And that was twice. They won five games twice. We are talking 29 years. And those dismal seasons were within the first five seasons. They did have a six game win season in 1982. So in 29 years, this franchise had a winning record every year but six. And all but one were the first five years of the expansion team.
Now we are in 1988. Dallas has no quarterback. That is
The Most Important position on the field. I had been a pretty big player that year in call in shows like Randy Galloway. It was some time in October when I realized there was this kid in UCLA who was exactly what Dallas needed. I brought this up to Galloway and he had no real idea of who Aikman was at that point more than his name. I kept it up calling his show every now and then. Not saying I started a ground swell, but as the year went along, more people started talking about Aikman on his show.
November 13th Dallas hosted Minnesota. I had complimentary tickets for that game from Budweiser. I sty right at the 40 yard line with five of my friends. I wore a Dallas Cowboy ball cap, but was vocally rooting for Minnesota, to the annoyance of people around us. Come half time several people turned and asked me what the hell was going on.
I explained about Aikman.
By the end of the third quarter I had converted a hand full of Cowboy fans. We were a Dallas Cowboy contingency who rooted for Minny because we needed a quarterback.
Come the last weekend of the regular season. Green Bay was mathematically ahead of Dallas for the Aikman pick. They were playing Arizona who was a much better team. Green Bay invited Aikman to that game, because he was their pick if they lost. And they knew they would lose against a better Arizona team.
Dallas was scheduled to play the 9-6 Philadelphia Eagles. That was a sure bet Dallas would lose. But in no way would Dallas get Aikman unless Green Bay beat a better team.
Arizona lost to Green Bay. Bum Bright sold the team to Jerry Jones, who brought in Jimmy Johnson. They picked Troy Aikman and went on and won three Super Bowls.
Troy Aikman
Tony Mandrich
Barry Sanders
Derrick Thomas
Deion Sanders
These were the first five picks that year. Outside of Mandrich, any one of these guys would be a great first over-all pick. But not a franchise quarterback.
Jeff George
Blair Thomas
Cortez Kennedy
Keith McCants
Junior Seau
These were the first five picks the next year. There is no franchise quarterback here. Dallas did pick up Steve Walsh in the supplemental draft the year Aikman was selected.
So how would this franchise have been different if Dallas was stuck with Steve Walsh who they picked up in the supplemental draft the year before, because Jimmy was familiar with him?
The Triplets Walsh, Smith, Irvin - frankly that would have been the twins with a mentally and surely physically challenged brother at QB.
I did not cause Aikman to come to the Cowboys. My rooting against the team to get that pick had no influence. But they did get that pick because of a loss, or maybe several losses that season.
Now tell me please how winning one extra game that year in a 3-13 season would have been a benefit for this franchise in the big scheme of things?
This game is about Super Bowls. I don't give a flying rat's ankle what some of the younger fans here say about gettying to the play-offs, or "you don't understand how tought it is to get to the Super Bowl. 13 and 3 and losing in the first round of the play-offs has significance only if that team comes back stronger the next year.
There is one champion every season.
The rest of the franchises failed.
So all the chest beating about this victory, or wanting to lose for a better draft slot is a loser mentality is horse manure. Every quality piece that can be put in place has a trickle down effect on the team and gets you a step closer to the NFC Championship game. Then it is win one and you are in the Dance.
Yesterday's win did not cost this team an Aikman. But it very well could have cost this team a NT that made the front line much better. Or another cornerback, or OT in the event Smith becomes a liability. We don't know.
But what I do know is ten years from now, this board will still be active, and you will not see a post about beating the Eagles in a 9-7 season was the lynchpin to greatness. It really was, for the Cowboys, a loser takes all game.
Sorry, but I sat in the stands for the very first Cowboy game at the Cotton Bowl. Been one since day one. This team should have played every back up for every position they could
. Zeke and Dak and Dez and Lee and Hitchins would have been pulled after the first series if I were calling the shots.
But then I don't clap my hands after each play because i got nothing else.