Goodell still in love with Britian

utrunner07

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,326
Reaction score
262
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4588350

LONDON -- NFL commissioner Roger Goodell expects the league to start playing multiple regular-season games in Britain in the next few years -- an expansion that could lead to putting a franchise in London.
Goodell said Friday that "every indicator" shows the British market can support more games and that having a franchise here is of "tremendous interest" to the league. But he stopped short of giving a timeline for expanding the NFL's overseas presence.
"The interest and the enthusiasm for our game continues to grow, and we want to feed that," Goodell said. "We want to respond to that by hopefully bringing more to the UK."



Goodell spoke at a sports conference Friday ahead of Sunday's game between the New England Patriots and Tampa Bay Buccaneers at Wembley Stadium. It's the third year in a row the NFL is staging a regular-season game in London, and the league is now looking into playing at least two games a year in Britain, he said. Aside from London, Manchester and Glasgow, Scotland, are being looked at as potential venues.
"I expect that sometime in the next couple of years, we could be playing multiple games here," Goodell said. "If we brought more than one game here, and it continues to have the same kind of enthusiasm and growth of interest, I think that is about as good of an indicator you can get that it could successfully support a franchise. And that's what we're looking at."
Staging a Super Bowl abroad, however, "is not something that is under active consideration," Goodell said.
The league is considering expanding the regular season to 17 or 18 games, with a possibility for every team to play one game abroad. Patriots owner Robert Kraft said if the league wants more of the current franchises to travel internationally for games, the regular season should be extended so that teams can keep the same number of home games. The Bucs are giving up a home game this season.
"I'm not sure our fans would appreciate us giving up a regular-season [home] game, and I know I wouldn't like to do that. But eventually I think there's a chance of that if we expand the schedule," Kraft said.
Kraft said placing an NFL team in London "would be the right thing to do some time in the next decade."
Goodell said he would prefer a potential London-based team was a completely new franchise, rather than moving one from an existing market.
"We would like to keep all our teams where they are," he said.
Patriots quarterback Tom Brady didn't sound too enthusiastic about playing for a team based in Europe.
"That would be challenging," Brady said. "But I don't see that happening any time soon."
The league is also eyeing having a team in Los Angeles again, especially after California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a bill this week allowing the construction of a 75,000-seat stadium that developers hope will lure an NFL team back to the Los Angeles area.
"I think there are some positive developments going on there," Goodell said. "But now we have to figure out how to pay for it. And in our economic system, that is a big challenge. It's at least an $800 million stadium."
He would not venture a guess as to what would come first, a team in London or Los Angeles.
"I don't know about the timing as far as the sequence," he said. "I would tell you that both markets are of tremendous interest to us."




If he wants to start a separate league Great Britian go for it, but taking NFL games to Britian or even worse and NFL franchise is beyond stupid and simply goes to show how obsessed with money this league has become. There are so many obvious problems with having a London based team, travel, time differences, few Americans are going to want to be drafted or traded across the ocean and GB simply does not have the ability to field a team on its own. Absolutely ridiculous, this is an American Sport and the NFL is an American league, wish the clown commissioner would stop trying to keep taking it away.
 

Big Dakota

New Member
Messages
11,876
Reaction score
0
I hate the logistics but whatever helps the NFL is OK with me.

Mexico City would be another logical step 20 years down the road.

Tokyo would be a cash cow but the distance is a nightmare.
 

utrunner07

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,326
Reaction score
262
Big Dakota;3031559 said:
I hate the logistics but whatever helps the NFL is OK with me.

Mexico City would be another logical step 20 years down the road.

Tokyo would be a cash cow but the distance is a nightmare.


Are you kidding? Whatever helps the NFL? The NFL is absolutely fine, the wealthiest professional sports league in the country and second wealthiest in the world. The league needs no help. This is about pure greed.
 

casmith07

Attorney-at-Zone
Messages
31,538
Reaction score
9,312
The only expansion I want to see is on THIS continent. Mexico City, and maybe Toronto or Montreal.

Imagine San Diego having to fly to play a road game against London. That's a 15-1/2 hour flight IF you don't have a layover. Then the time difference? It's an asinine idea, and one of the many reasons that I do not approve of Roger Goodell.
 

Rogah

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,473
Reaction score
793
Expansion to London would be a joke. I would honestly reconsider my commitment to following the NFL if they ever do it. It would provide such a tremendous competitive disadvantage to a team that had to travel so much, they would never win 6 games in any season. Players would have to choose between relocating their entrie families to another continent or spend months away from them. Good luck attracting any free agents.

Every team that has played in London has had a full bye week to recuperate after the trip. Obviously playing a full season in London would not afford a team that luxury.
 

Tom [Giants fan]

Active Member
Messages
737
Reaction score
106
is dumb. Putting a franchise there that will have to travel to the U.S. 8 times a year to play regular season games? Idiotic. Don't fix what isn't broken!!
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
IF the concorde was still around then it is borderline possible. But its not. You are looking at 6-7 hours flight just to NY or Phili or Boston, and maybe Baltimore and Wash. From there on you are talking 8, 9, 10 hours and so on. Same for teams coming over to play. Its just too much. That is one big reason its a joke. Another is there is no evidence that you can put 75,000 fans in a stadium 8 times a year there. Especially in the cold and wet weather you get in England from sept to jan. ITs a total joke.
 

Ren

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,218
Reaction score
1,944
I hate the London games it's always a bad game and always the only game on TV in Europe that week :bang2:
 

StylisticS

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,714
Reaction score
6,080
If they are dying to go international, go to Toronto. I can't believe he is serious about London.
 

Cochese

Benched
Messages
7,360
Reaction score
0
Goodell loves Britian, but we send them the Buccaneers.

A team in London is an absolutely terrible idea, everyone else has allready said why.
 

ArmyCowboy

New Member
Messages
951
Reaction score
0
casmith07;3031569 said:
The only expansion I want to see is on THIS continent. Mexico City, and maybe Toronto or Montreal.

Imagine San Diego having to fly to play a road game against London. That's a 15-1/2 hour flight IF you don't have a layover. Then the time difference? It's an asinine idea, and one of the many reasons that I do not approve of Roger Goodell.

Mexico City would be horrible.

It's extremely poluted, very over-crowded, poor, 7000+ ft above sea level and not everybody speaks Spanish.

Good luck attracting free agents to that sewer.
 

kmp77

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,309
Reaction score
396
What's the point of taking 60 americans and making them go live in London? Then making 60 other american's go fly there every week? I could understand it if it was an english team but 99% of the team will be americans. I just don't get. Just pure greed.

And as for Mexico? Really? Talk about some holdouts. You want me to go live and play in Mexico? I don't think so. You imagine the first player to get abducted?

Canada is the only place I'd like the NFL to move to.
 

Jimz31

The Sarcastic One
Messages
14,388
Reaction score
231
NFL Europe died on the vine...

Just like the NFL wanting a franchise in Los Angeles....they don't support it yet you hear the NFL and others in California talking about how LA should have a franchise....they've had team and couldn't keep them...screw LA and screw London.
 

UKCowboysFan

Member
Messages
457
Reaction score
10
Having been to all 3 games at Wembley it is a great event for all the NFL fans in the UK and I'm also amazed at how many travel from the rest of Europe.

The people that really lose out are the fans of the "Home" team, although I guess for the Bucs this year it's probably a relief to not have to watch them :)

But I can't see the idea of having a franchise in the UK working. Most NFL fans in the UK already have allegiances to their teams, so are not going to just swap & support someone else.

For instance, if London were playing the Cowboys, I'd be supporting the Cowboys every time.


PS Ren, I thought last years game was a really good one.
 

ArmyCowboy

New Member
Messages
951
Reaction score
0
Jimz31;3032160 said:
NFL Europe died on the vine...

Just like the NFL wanting a franchise in Los Angeles....they don't support it yet you hear the NFL and others in California talking about how LA should have a franchise....they've had team and couldn't keep them...screw LA and screw London.

I'm not in favor of an expansion to Europe, because I think the team there would be at a huge disadvantage because of travel.

However, you can't just use NFL Europe to try to prove that it won't take over there. The quality of the football was horrible and I seriously doubt it would have done any better here in the US.
 

UKCowboysFan

Member
Messages
457
Reaction score
10
ArmyCowboy;3037405 said:
I'm not in favor of an expansion to Europe, because I think the team there would be at a huge disadvantage because of travel.

However, you can't just use NFL Europe to try to prove that it won't take over there. The quality of the football was horrible and I seriously doubt it would have done any better here in the US.

Also the fans found it difficult to identify with the teams. Most of the teams changed their rosters completely from season to season so it was hard with the teams to identify with the players
 

SaltwaterServr

Blank Paper Offends Me
Messages
8,124
Reaction score
1
I too do NOT want to see a team in Mexico City. Living in San Antonio and working in the real estate business, I can tell you firsthand that there are a great number of families that live here, but the father works and lives in one of the major Mexico cities.

Having a home here and paying taxes here is cheaper than body guards and kidnapping insurance, from what I've been told.

I can see expansion into Canada though. Hawaii is more deserving of a team, and would still present the logistical nightmares of traveling to the opposite coast for a game. Keep it continental.
 

Biggems

White and Nerdy
Messages
14,327
Reaction score
2,254
If Goodell likes England so much.........move there...enjoy all the smoking, smog, bad teeth, filth, and horrible weather. Within 6 months he will be back in the US.

As far as a team in Toronto, NO.....Canada has a football league. They don't deserve an NFL team over the handful of US cities that would support one.

As for Mexico, I disagree about putting a team in Mexico City. I wouldn't do it. Instead, I would put a team in Monterray. It is a smaller, yet still huge, cleaner and more attractive city than Mexico City. Plus it is a lot closer to any US city.
 

Cajuncowboy

Preacher From The Black Lagoon
Messages
27,499
Reaction score
81
With this economy the NFL wants to take it's product and spread it's wealth to a foreign country. When we have LA out there with no team. Brilliant Goodell, just brilliant.
 

ArmyCowboy

New Member
Messages
951
Reaction score
0
Biggems;3039970 said:
If Goodell likes England so much.........move there...enjoy all the smoking, smog, bad teeth, filth, and horrible weather. Within 6 months he will be back in the US.

As far as a team in Toronto, NO.....Canada has a football league. They don't deserve an NFL team over the handful of US cities that would support one.

As for Mexico, I disagree about putting a team in Mexico City. I wouldn't do it. Instead, I would put a team in Monterray. It is a smaller, yet still huge, cleaner and more attractive city than Mexico City. Plus it is a lot closer to any US city.

How much time have you spent in Britain?

My wife is Scottish and I spend quit a bit of time there and it's a beautiful area and generally a lot cleaner than the comparible areas in the United States.

Does London have polution? Sure, but far less than New York City or LA and it's a heck of a lot safer as well.

I have a feeling you're just going off of stereotypes and have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
 
Top