MonsterD;5092002 said:
Not from this article but the CBS one on freaks this is seriously the quote of the year.
"They're all electronic," Kazadi said. "We don't hand-time anything. Hand times are for your mama. Your mama don't work here. We're not hand-timing anything around here. We encourage people to come watch our guys work. They take this seriously."
Not sure it matters how he times them. It's how the scouts time them at the combine.
Posting some crazy speed because you've been using an electronic timer might not work out for you if the guys who grade you are using hand timers and your 40s are slower than expected.
Don't teams send their own guys to time?
I've gone back and forth on the hand/electronic. I thought electronic would be good because it makes it an accurate measure for each guy but so long as they start the clock when the guy moves you don't really get a true sense of the guy's playing speed. If you are slow to react, being fast will help you catch up.
I doubt the reaction of the timer is significantly slower than the reaction of the athlete to the snap. Maybe teams view the hand-timing as canceling out generous start time that is unrealistic.
They should have a simulated start for the guys and the time starts then......electronically of course........:laugh2:
So...I'm still on the fence.
I don't think it matters in the end. The 40 is good for identifying guys who are well faster than everyone else and guys who are well slower. Everything else in between is sort of "meh".