Grades: Wide Receivers

Arch Stanton

it was the grave marked unknown right beside
Messages
6,474
Reaction score
0
Grades: Wide Receivers
The Cowboys have spent a lot of money on this position, from Terrell Owens to Roy Williams to Patrick Crayton. All three are locked into long-term deals, yet this position did not yield the type of results in 2008 as was expected.



Terrell Owens: C
Owens finished the season with 69 receptions for 1,052 yards and 10 touchdowns. He had two 100-yard receiving games. This was his least productive "full" season since 1999 when he caught 60 passes in 14 games for the 49ers.
The rap on Owens before the year was that he couldn't play a full season any more; he did appear in all 16 games, but clearly age has caught him.
Owens is 35, and he no longer can ever be the top receiver he was when he was 28 or even 31. Owens can look like he's 25 and have chiseled features but it doesn't change the fact he's 35, and receivers are never, ever better with that much age.
He struggled with press coverage, and he never showed the ability "to go and get the ball." The ball pretty much has to be "right there" for him to make a play.
He signed a three-year extension before the start of the '08 season, but now it appears very doubtful he will be worth it, or that he will see the end of the contract.
The hard truth is that Owens' best days are behind him.


Roy Williams: C
Williams played in 10 games for the Cowboys after he was traded by the Lions and finished with 19 receptions for 198 yards and one touchdown. The Cowboys thought they were going to get instant production from Williams, but it quickly became apparent he had zero timing or chemistry with Tony Romo. That only happens with a full off-season and training camp.
Don't kill Williams or this trade until Williams has had a full season with Romo. If the numbers and production still stink then, feel free to rip away.
The Cowboys traded three draft picks to the Lions for Williams to become a No. 1 receiver, and likely Owens' replacement. He didn't show much yet, and he's on the clock.


Patrick Crayton: C

Crayton is another case of a player whose value and production may have peaked. In 2007, he finished with 50 receptions for 697 yards and seven touchdowns. In 2008, Crayton had 39 receptions for 550 yards and four touchdowns.
He is a pretty decent No. 3, slot receiver, but nothing more.


Miles Austin: B

Austin is arguably the fastest receiver on the roster, and showed flashes of big-time potential. But he was slowed by knee injuries since the second week of the preseason. In 12 games, he finished with 13 catches for 278 yards and three touchdowns. In the Cowboys' Week 3 win in Green Bay, Austin had two catches for 115 yards and a touchdown. He may yet develop into a quality No. 2 receiver, but it's going to be hard on this roster.


Isaiah Stanback: Inc

The fourth-round draft pick from 2007 continues to battle injuries, and he's about to enter a make-or-break zone. In eight games this season, he had two catches for 24 yards.
No one doubts his athletic ability, but it's hard not to question his ability to stay healthy. He probably has one more training camp to make an impression or he's going to be cut.


Sam Hurd: Inc.
Hurd was limited to three games in 2008 because of injuries. Because of numbers, Hurd faces a serious problem of making this team in 2009.
In two seasons he has 24 catches for 389 yards and a touchdown. He created a niche as a special teams player, but making the team as just that on a roster loaded with pricey receivers may be tough.


Overall, the Cowboys have talent at this position. But it seems to be at a crossroads - their No. 1 receiver can't be expected to have another 100-catch year, or come close to being the dominant player he once was. The success of this position largely swings on what Roy Williams becomes, and how much more room for improvement Miles Austin has.


- Mac Engel

http://dallascowboyscentral.com/forum/fwst-grades-wide-receivers-t9692.html
 

WG5516

New Member
Messages
1,054
Reaction score
0
Is Mac Engel married to that Jennifer chick?

Anyway, this article is a FAIL!
 

KingintheNorth

Chris in Arizona
Messages
18,444
Reaction score
25,828
WR is one of the few positions we don't need to address this off-season.

We have TO and we are all hoping Roy improves with an off-season and training camp under his belt. We have a quality 3rd WR in Patrick Crayton and Miles Austin looks like a future star. I don't think we would cry if Crayton was dealt and Austin became the 3rd WR. That would keep the door open for Sam Hurd, who IMO, doesn't doing anything exceptional but is a decent WR and special teamer. I think that because of the talent here, Isaiah Stanbeck gets 1 more year to show something.

Now, if some unbelievable talent slips to us in the draft it wouldn't be a bad move to draft him. TO is one temper tantrum away from being released and even if he doesn't, he's getting up there in years.
 

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,654
Reaction score
42,998
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
WG5516;2560748 said:
Is Mac Engel married to that Jennifer chick?

Anyway, this article is a FAIL!

Yes...can you imagine that house?

I can see them arguing using long exaggerated diatribes to explain how each other are incompetent in this or that.

:laugh2:
 

hairic

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,724
Reaction score
650
Chris in SoCal;2560763 said:
WR is one of the few positions we don't need to address this off-season.

We have TO and we are all hoping Roy improves with an off-season and training camp under his belt. We have a quality 3rd WR in Patrick Crayton and Miles Austin looks like a future star. I don't think we would cry if Crayton was dealt and Austin became the 3rd WR. That would keep the door open for Sam Hurd, who IMO, doesn't doing anything exceptional but is a decent WR and special teamer. I think that because of the talent here, Isaiah Stanbeck gets 1 more year to show something.

Now, if some unbelievable talent slips to us in the draft it wouldn't be a bad move to draft him. TO is one temper tantrum away from being released and even if he doesn't, he's getting up there in years.

Yet, it'll be among the first positions to be addressed. Miles Austin and Sam Hurd are RFAs. So it's possible we go into the draft with only Owens, Williams, Crayton, and Stanback on the roster.
 

KingintheNorth

Chris in Arizona
Messages
18,444
Reaction score
25,828
I doubt we lose either in restricted free agency. I think Austin may get a high tender and if someone wants him so bad they are willing to give us a first round pick then so be it.

If someone wants to pay a bunch of money for Hurd then that's okay too.
 

TellerMorrow34

BraveHeartFan
Messages
28,358
Reaction score
5,076
Yeah with them being RFA that gives us some leverage and potentially some picks as well if some team decides they just have to have one of them.

I can't see anyone giving anything up for Hurd. Possibly could see a team or two maybe thinking about pulling the trigger for Austin.
 

30yrheel

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,076
Reaction score
362
Chris in SoCal;2560763 said:
WR is one of the few positions we don't need to address this off-season.

We have TO and we are all hoping Roy improves with an off-season and training camp under his belt. We have a quality 3rd WR in Patrick Crayton and Miles Austin looks like a future star. I don't think we would cry if Crayton was dealt and Austin became the 3rd WR. That would keep the door open for Sam Hurd, who IMO, doesn't doing anything exceptional but is a decent WR and special teamer. I think that because of the talent here, Isaiah Stanbeck gets 1 more year to show something.

Now, if some unbelievable talent slips to us in the draft it wouldn't be a bad move to draft him. TO is one temper tantrum away from being released and even if he doesn't, he's getting up there in years.

disagree. TO is past his prime, austin is injury prone, roy w. is still more of a #2, hurd's too slow, crayton is too slow, stanback is a never was.
i think we need to draft another speed guy.
 

NextGenBoys

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,252
Reaction score
1,964
Chris in SoCal;2560944 said:
I doubt we lose either in restricted free agency. I think Austin may get a high tender and if someone wants him so bad they are willing to give us a first round pick then so be it.

If someone wants to pay a bunch of money for Hurd then that's okay too.

Not true. Since Austin was an UDFA teams are not required to give us a draft pick for compensation. We simply have the right to match the offer.
 

JordanTaber

Benched
Messages
609
Reaction score
0
Owens has only caught 100 passes ONCE in his entire career (2002).

This guy is an imbecile of epic proportions.
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
NextGenBoys;2561186 said:
Not true. Since Austin was an UDFA teams are not required to give us a draft pick for compensation. We simply have the right to match the offer.

RFA compensation is based on the level of the qualifying offer. We could tender him at a level to get a first rd pick, a 2nd rd pick or no compensation( lowest tender is pick tied to original draft round) Since we have plenty of cap room, bank on him getting at least the 2nd rd tender offer.
 

Audiman

New Member
Messages
750
Reaction score
0
JordanTaber;2561232 said:
Owens has only caught 100 passes ONCE in his entire career (2002).

This guy is an imbecile of epic proportions.

Pot, meet Kettle.
 

Venger

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,661
Reaction score
788
This article is asinine. Williams and TO get the same grade? Austin gets a B on one catch a friggin' game? COME ON!!!

Fail? Epic Fail.
 

Audiman

New Member
Messages
750
Reaction score
0
JordanTaber;2561325 said:
Oooh, did you think that one up all by yourself?

I didn't realize the number of receptions was the only stat looked at when talking about one of the best recievers in the NFL...
 

JordanTaber

Benched
Messages
609
Reaction score
0
Audiman;2561351 said:
I didn't realize the number of receptions was the only stat looked at when talking about one of the best recievers in the NFL...

I think you misinterpreted what I was saying.

This moron thinks that Owens is washed up and can "no longer catch 100 passes" (in his words). I was pointing out that Owens has never been the kind of guy to catch 100 passes (it's what he does with his 70-80 catches that makes him great), so this guy really has no idea what he's talking about.
 

Audiman

New Member
Messages
750
Reaction score
0
JordanTaber;2561360 said:
I think you misinterpreted what I was saying.

This moron thinks that Owens is washed up and can "no longer catch 100 passes" (in his words). I was pointing out that Owens has never been the kind of guy to catch 100 passes (it's what he does with his 70-80 catches that makes him great), so this guy really has no idea what he's talking about.

word. I guess I did misinterpret what you were trying to say. my fault.

thought you were just another TO hater that can't back it up with facts.
 

EPL0c0

The Funcooker
Messages
8,054
Reaction score
3,812
30yrheel;2560986 said:
disagree. TO is past his prime, austin is injury prone, roy w. is still more of a #2, hurd's too slow, crayton is too slow, stanback is a never was.
i think we need to draft another speed guy.
Why draft!?!?

FOUR WORDS: JOHNNIE LEE HIGGINS JR!

He easily replaces Hurd, Stanback and Crayton plus opens up 2 roster spots!!
 
Top