Greg Jennings: "Daniel Jones is a top-10 quarterback, he's better than Dak Prescott."

CT Dal Fan

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,149
Reaction score
21,364
It says the same thing about Romo as it does about Dak: both put up good regular-season stats but couldn't bring the team anywhere in the playoffs. As for the Jones v.Romo comparison, Jones had one good season so far in his short career and is overpaid just like Dak and many other QB's.
This team's front office- and by that I mean the Jones boys- wasted Romo's career just as many other players, including Dak. Neither Romo or Dak are/were perfect but both were/are good enough to win titles. But neither have had the coaching, supporting cast, or the right combination of either to do so.

I might take fire for this but in my opinion the Cowboys could have won the Super Bowl if the stars aligned correctly many times since 1996. I count three times each with Romo and Dak- 2007, 2009, 2014, 2016, 2021, and 2022.
 

bottleKids

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,065
Reaction score
1,152
You're to entertaing to ignore. You don't get your feelings hurt like some others. You can dish it, but you can also take it. I can respect that. I don't respect the ones that start crying, but they are entertaining too.
Your buddy didn't even respond to my post! Lol!
Nothing like a good laugh for breakfast
Almost as entertaining as your grammar. I always find it ironic, people who insult other intelligence while not understanding the proper use of "too" and "to".
 

Flamma

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,119
Reaction score
20,695
He threw for 15 touchdowns and 7 rushing…what am I missing here lol?
What does that matter? That happens a lot when a team relies on the run game. Hurts threw for a whole 22 TDs last year and was a serious MVP candidate. Dak threw 23 in 2016. When everyone thought he was the second coming. Dallas does better when Dak throws less.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,533
Reaction score
76,370
It's not insulting. It's stupid agenda driven drivel to male arguments against Dak, with the 4-1 outcome masking what really happened.

Give me Ravens defense of the yore that allowed 10 points a game or less and i will take Rush. Reality is we don't have that defense.
Even then I wouldn’t do it. I’m just not I’d the belief that anyone can play quarterback at a high level. Not like Rush. You can say Flacco and Nick Foles but there’s a certain ceiling there. Rush is not capable of putting up big time performances.
 

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
61,602
Reaction score
38,974
What does that matter? That happens a lot when a team relies on the run game. Hurts threw for a whole 22 TDs last year and was a serious MVP candidate. Dak threw 23 in 2016. When everyone thought he was the second coming. Dallas does better when Dak throws less.
Jones actually had a career high in attempts this past season but was much more efficient. He only had 5 INT’s and had a career high completion percentage of just over 67%. Plus, he had a career high passer rating of 92.5.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,533
Reaction score
76,370
The point is Dallas is really no better than the Browns the last 27 years in terms of Super Bowl appearances.
Well who the hell even made that point you troll? No one needed you to remind us how bad the Cowboys have been….wait what? It just hit me you said the Cowboys are no better than the Browns last 27 year….you silly man.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,533
Reaction score
76,370
What does that matter? That happens a lot when a team relies on the run game. Hurts threw for a whole 22 TDs last year and was a serious MVP candidate. Dak threw 23 in 2016. When everyone thought he was the second coming. Dallas does better when Dak throws less.
What does it matter? Those stats stink lol. It’s pedestrian…and Hurts was a MVP candidate because he had 13 rushing touchdowns to 22 passing touchdowns. Nothing like Daniel Jones.

And are you seriously comparing to Dak his rookie season? Man y’all agenda is weird as hell.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,533
Reaction score
76,370
Jones actually had a career high in attempts this past season but was much more efficient. He only had 5 INT’s and had a career high completion percentage of just over 67%. Plus, he had a career high passer rating of 92.5.
A career passing rating of a 92.5 sucks.
 

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
61,602
Reaction score
38,974
The point is Dallas is really no better than the Browns the last 27 years in terms of Super Bowl appearances.
There’s a lot of teams that haven’t been to the Super Bowl the last 27 years. The Browns have never been to a Super Bowl so I wouldn’t be lumping the Cowboys in with them. The Browns biggest problem is they’ve had no stability at QB since they moved on from Bernie Kosar in 1993.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,533
Reaction score
76,370
"It doesn't matter if you made the wrong decision on QB and paid him a quarter of your cap, win anyway."

He thinks this is an intelligent viewpoint.
Exactly. I can you were the person who never got picked to do anything worth a damn. Too much of a pessimistic….loss before the damn game started smh.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,533
Reaction score
76,370
It says the same thing about Romo as it does about Dak: both put up good regular-season stats but couldn't bring the team anywhere in the playoffs. As for the Jones v.Romo comparison, Jones had one good season so far in his short career and is overpaid just like Dak and many other QB's.
So let me put this on record…Daniel Jones is having a better career than Dak and Romo?
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,533
Reaction score
76,370
Much more likely to bust out at that position more than any other. The proof is all over the NFL.

But the critical factor in all of this is the track record of this brain trust with that position. They lucked into the last two QB1's and would have taken Lynch or Cook ahead of Prescott.

Does anyone here trust these people to draft the franchise QB?
I know I don’t. Especially because I don’t even think this team would ever take a QB high. I think they’d try and draft a guy at best late in the first round like a Paxton Lynch.
 

Risen Star

Likes Collector
Messages
89,037
Reaction score
211,178
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Exactly. I can you were the person who never got picked to do anything worth a damn. Too much of a pessimistic….loss before the damn game started smh.
That and I realize that in a game that's centered around the QB having a bad one matters.

But your no excuses rant has inspired us.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
33,944
Reaction score
19,494
Even then I wouldn’t do it. I’m just not I’d the belief that anyone can play quarterback at a high level. Not like Rush. You can say Flacco and Nick Foles but there’s a certain ceiling there. Rush is not capable of putting up big time performances.
Oh, I don't disagree. Rush has beennincrdibly lucky in limited time. But it wore off quickly.
 

Flamma

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,119
Reaction score
20,695
What does it matter? Those stats stink lol. It’s pedestrian…and Hurts was a MVP candidate because he had 13 rushing touchdowns to 22 passing touchdowns. Nothing like Daniel Jones.

And are you seriously comparing to Dak his rookie season? Man y’all agenda is weird as hell.
LOL, his stats do stink. But when we're talking tier 2 QBs, what's the real gap between them before we start entering a different tier for a lack of a better term?

Jones is an odd case. We'll know a lot more next season. As he'll have a halfway decent team around him and little excuse.
 
Top