Greg Jennings: "Daniel Jones is a top-10 quarterback, he's better than Dak Prescott."

[NotForLong]

Dak circa 2022 minus the legs.

oh damn . . . low blow low blow

Only Jerry would give that kind of contract to a one legged QB

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

oh damn . . . low blow low blow

Only Jerry would give that kind of contract to a one legged QB

I was more referring to the fact that Dak looks like he's stuck in mud when he runs now.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Prove it.

What does that have to do with Dak anyways?

This is about your fake belief in Dak. This isn't about the Chiefs or Eagles.

Tell you what how about this bet? Dak sucks right? So you have no issue taking this bet on right?


Dak has 4000 yards passing over 30 TDs under 12 INTs and the Cowboys win 10 or more games.

You taking this bet?

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Tell you what how about this bet? Dak sucks right? So you have no issue taking this bet on right?


Dak has 4000 yards passing over 30 TDs under 12 INTs and the Cowboys win 10 or more games.

You taking this bet?

All that has to happen and injuries don't cancel anything out?

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

They are nearly equal as passers.

I feel like Jones can make more difficult throws but Dak plays with more confidence.

Having an adequate offensive line and weapons to throw to greatly help Dak. Jones is by himself.

You "feel he can make more difficult throws but he surely hasn't. You guys use the "no offensive line" excuse to justify why Daniel Jones passing stats suck....they suck for him but for some reason he and Barkley put up rushing stats. Very odd. I guess they can only run block but suck at pass blocking.

Guys produce with bad offensive lines. I can justify having a bad offensive line and not winning a SB. Its not possible. But if you want me to think a bad offensive line stops you from producing? We've seen time and time again that not being the case.

There is nothing factual about them being "equal" as passers. There's no stat to back this claim up, there's no eye test....there's nothing.

Daniel Jones is currently a bust until proven otherwise.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

All that has to happen and injuries don't cancel anything out?

Naw if he gets hurt it’s void.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Naw if he gets hurt it’s void.

Then no.

Because he's an injury prone mess at this point.

You and I both know he won't play 17 games. He hasn't played a full season in 3 years.

I asked because I knew you'd say that voids the bet, because you know he'll miss a few games and the bet will be voided, so no worries about losing it.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Then no.

Because he's an injury prone mess at this point.

You and I both know he won't play 17 games. He hasn't played a full season in 3 years.

I asked because I knew you'd say that voids the bet, because you know he'll miss a few games and the bet will be voided, so no worries about losing it.

Then no.

Because he's an injury prone mess at this point.

You and I both know he won't play 17 games. He hasn't played a full season in 3 years.

I asked because I knew you'd say that voids the bet, because you know he'll miss a few games and the bet will be voided, so no worries about losing it.

Huh? What do you care you think he sucks right? Why do you care how many games he plays?

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Huh? What do you care you think he sucks right? Why do you care how many games he plays?

I don't play to just have it voided because he misses a few games.

Either you have confidence that he puts up those numbers and stays healthy or not.

 

[DallasEast]

Just a suggestion as a possible compromise.

Make a statistic bet that sets the minimum number of games that the player must complete as the condition. If the player reaches the minimum or exceeds it, the bet stands. If the player does not reach that minimum, the bet is negated.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Just a suggestion as a possible compromise.

Make a statistic bet that sets the minimum number of games that the player must complete as the condition. If the player reaches the minimum or exceeds it, the bet stands. If the player does not reach that minimum, the bet is negated.

Would you lock the loser of the best account so they cannot access it?

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

I don't play to just have it voided because he misses a few games.

Either you have confidence that he puts up those numbers and stays healthy or not.

You don't lose either way. Either you don't lose if he gets hurt or you don't lose if he stays healthy. Its a win win for you. You can't lose the bet.

 

[phildadon86]

Then no.

Because he's an injury prone mess at this point.

You and I both know he won't play 17 games. He hasn't played a full season in 3 years.

I asked because I knew you'd say that voids the bet, because you know he'll miss a few games and the bet will be voided, so no worries about losing it.

If he gets hurt that actually helps you. At least from what I am seeing from this bet. Just my 2 cents

 

[DallasEast]

Would you lock the loser of the best account so they cannot access it?

No. Of course not. Bets of this nature are between members. It has nothing to do with moderation.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

You don't lose either way. Either you don't lose if he gets hurt or you don't lose if he stays healthy. Its a win win for you. You can't lose the bet.

But if he gets hurt it's not a loss for you.

That's the problem.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Would you lock the loser of the best account so they cannot access it?

I'm a man of my word. I can't say the same for you to be honest.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

If he gets hurt that actually helps you. At least from what I am seeing from this bet. Just my 2 cents

If he gets hurt then I don't win the bet.

I'm not playing for a draw.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

But if he gets hurt it's not a loss for you.

That's the problem.

Of course its not. IF he plays 6 games why should I lose? This isn't a bet about if he can stay healthy this is a bet about how good he is. I'm backing my claim up. You're acting scared.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

If he gets hurt then I don't win the bet.

I'm not playing for a draw.

So you have the option to "draw" or win the bet. I have the option to lose the bet even if he plays 17 games because Dak sucks....I'm guaranteed to either "draw" or lose the bet. How are you not taking this bet?

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Of course its not. IF he plays 6 games why should I lose? This isn't a bet about if he can stay healthy this is a bet about how good he is. I'm backing my claim up. You're acting scared.

Unforntunetley, when it comes to Dak, health has to always factor in now.

Either you have confidence in his ability to stay healthy and put up those numbers or you don't.

I'm not looking for a draw here. Either I win or I lose.