I don't understand. You are not putting money on the line.. You are just putting up your account. You literally can't lose. Dak sucks. You can't LOSE this bet. I'm the only one that can lose and you want me to not put a injury stipulation in there? How is this bet even fair then lol?
You having the out of saying "Well, Dak only threw for 3,500 yards because he only played in 12 games" don't work for me.
Just say you don't believe in him to stay healthy and put up those numbers instead of pretending you want to actually make this bet.
I really don't get it. I'm the only one that can actually lose here lol. You're afraid of me voiding the bet because of injury? You can't lose this bet. Why are you not taking this? Make it make sense to me.
so its one of those type of threads like when someone mentions cowboys stadium, which turns into a specific section of the stadium, and a specific game after that and then into a discussion about defense, that turns into DE discussion, then turns into sacks, then into Dak getting sacked too much and then into Dak can't read defense and holds on to the ball too long, and then 35 pages later...
I just said as much. I don't know if he will stay healthy. This bet was never about his health. I never once claimed he was healthy or not injury prone or what. This is simply about skill. This isn't about his health. IF you want to make a bet on his health that's something altogether.
Either Dak puts up the numbers you said and I lose or he doesn’t and you lose.
He's not gonna take it. He wants a bet where he has all the leverage and I'm betting against the field. I've given him enough IMO. He can't lose. Dak will never throw for 30 Touchdowns and less than 12 picks. NEVER. At best he can win. At best I can just draw because of injury.
Its not an injury "out". Its a fair bet. Why would you even want to win a bet because of "injury"? The hell lol?
...except Greg Jennings predicted Daniel Jones would eventually become the second best quarterback in the NFC East behind Jalen Hurts and ahead of Dak Prescott. It would have been unlikely that the conversation would have centered upon Hurts. Essentially, the thread has been about Prescott from the start.so its one of those type of threads like when someone mentions cowboys stadium, which turns into a specific section of the stadium, and a specific game after that and then into a discussion about defense, that turns into DE discussion, then turns into sacks, then into Dak getting sacked too much and then into Dak can't read defense and holds on to the ball too long, and then 35 pages later...
got it
It’s an out.
To be fair, Purdy was injured the third play of the game against the Eagles, and never should have been put back in the game.
I don't believe he'll get hurt. But it happens. Guys get hurt every season. Just say you're scared lol. This is what you do. You come up with these insane bets where you have all the leverage. How is that even fair? How are of them fair? I gave you a fair one where the worst case scenario is you "draw". That's a great bet for you that I shouldn't even take.
I think there's a good conversation to be had between those who like Dak and those who don't. But from my experience the anti-Dak guys on this site are just unreasonable and have no intentions in a discussion just trolling. And unfortunately that's how all these threads go. Its unfortunate.
I mean I have nothing against the guy. He could be good. Could be bad. I don't think anyone really knows and I won't hold it against him that he has a good supporting cast. I just get into this discussion about how good he was against Dallas and the guy was ok but didn't score any points. Didn't have to but the narrative "we lost to Purdy" is not a honest one.
Why not just agree to put your account up in the case of a draw as well? Wouldnt that solve the issues?
Ask him he's the one who wants all the leverage. He wants a bet where he has a 100% chance of winning.
Every player on the field is injury prone.
It's a rough game.
