Gregg Rosenthal's best Rosters in NFC; We are 5th

Arkyvarminter

Arkyvarminter

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,510
Reaction score
1,945
I know its been said a thousand times that it doesn't matter where we are rated or what anyone thinks but this is getting ridiculous. I can make a case against the Packers and Seahawks if I wanted but the Eagles and Cardinals? I guess I'm just getting tired of, year after year, being ranked under the Eagles. They get worse on Offense but move ahead of us? Or were they ahead of us anyway? I don't get it and never will. How can every analyst, writer, commentator, etc, be so biased and expect to be taken seriously? Don't tell me it doesn't matter because I go to several sites to get my info for the day and keep seeing how last year's play doesn't represent this team...BULL

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000484714/article/who-has-the-best-roster-in-the-nfc
 
Rosenthal has to be a closet Eagles fan. He's been slobbering over them and Kelly for the past 12-18 months.
 
To get any respect we will have to win two Super Bowls...............in a row!
 
I would seriously bet money that the Eagles don't sniff the playoffs this year....NO way are they as good as they were last year..no way
 
He's entitled to those rankings and I agree with the Seahawks but what on earth did the Packers do this offseason to become "Heavyweights"? And it seems insane to me to put the Cowboys and Cardinals so close to teams like the Aint's and Eagirls.
 
speedkilz88 said:
I expect them to fall to #3 in the division now. Gnats get 2nd by default.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure what to think about the Giants. I expect the Cowboys and Eagirls to fight for #1......Deadskins...I expect NOTHING. But the Giants.....if the offense gets rolling.....its going to be tough to stop especially if they get a formidable running game. Their offensive line is going to be the difference whether they are a threat or not.
 
DM will be hurt by game 5 and fumble the game away against Dallas. Just wait til he suits up against Rod's crew. Strip the ball every play man. He will cough it up.
 
rocyaice said:
He's entitled to those rankings and I agree with the Seahawks but what on earth did the Packers do this offseason to become "Heavyweights"? And it seems insane to me to put the Cowboys and Cardinals so close to teams like the Aint's and Eagirls.
Click to expand...

Retained players and developed in other areas, like offensive line, tight end, and receiver. Treading water with a rookie who may be a standout in year two is as good as signing a free agent at a spot, actually it is better than that.
 
Arkyvarminter said:
I guess I'm just getting tired of, year after year, being ranked under the Eagles.
Click to expand...

All that matters is that at the end of the regular season we were ranked highly enough to get into the playoffs, they weren't.

Talking heads talk, but that doesn't mean I have to listen (or read, as the case may be).
 
The Eagles might be there because they can still win with their back up QB - to some extent, versus our Cowboys who don't seem to have a capable backup to be starter.
 
Joe Realist said:
The Eagles might be there because they can still win with their back up QB - to some extent, versus our Cowboys who don't seem to have a capable backup to be starter.
Click to expand...

He was 5-4 as a starter and lost 3 straight in his last four games. And that offense group isn't going to be as good.
 
Not that big a deal. Didn't read the piece but am sure it is based on Murray leaving and the defense needing to be upgraded. CB is a question mark as are the DL (both DT and DE) and RB spots. Post draft and after camp I'd like to have the assessment done again by Rosenthal or anyone else.
 
Nation said:
Retained players and developed in other areas, like offensive line, tight end, and receiver. Treading water with a rookie who may be a standout in year two is as good as signing a free agent at a spot, actually it is better than that.
Click to expand...

Who are you speaking of? The Packers? All the above can be said about the Cardinals and the Cowboys. The Cardinals made the post season last year with no quarterback. A healthy Carson Palmer who is superior to the QB play they had should help them as well.
 
This is a lazy, piss poor list!

"They have one winning season out of four under Jason Garrett." this could easily be written "in 4 seasons, they don't have a losing season under Jason Garrett"

I get it, speaking negatively of the cowboys gets ratings, but to do such a poor job at it is pathetic!

Also, i'd stack our roster against GB's any day!
 
speedkilz88 said:
He was 5-4 as a starter and lost 3 straight in his last four games. And that offense group isn't going to be as good.
Click to expand...

They beat the Titans, Giants, Panthers, a Cowboys team coming off a significantly shorter week, and beat the Texans.

I think we could have won at least 3 of those games with Weeden tbh.
 
Our offense is loaded.

But getting Lee and McClain back and adding Hardy helped!
 
Arkyvarminter said:
I know its been said a thousand times that it doesn't matter where we are rated or what anyone thinks but this is getting ridiculous. I can make a case against the Packers and Seahawks if I wanted but the Eagles and Cardinals? I guess I'm just getting tired of, year after year, being ranked under the Eagles. They get worse on Offense but move ahead of us? Or were they ahead of us anyway? I don't get it and never will. How can every analyst, writer, commentator, etc, be so biased and expect to be taken seriously? Don't tell me it doesn't matter because I go to several sites to get my info for the day and keep seeing how last year's play doesn't represent this team...BULL

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000484714/article/who-has-the-best-roster-in-the-nfc
Click to expand...

Believe it or not but they take into consideration our defense as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 74 more.
Total: 4,086 (members: 174, guests: 3,912)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,655
Messages
13,824,600
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top